






Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V21!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 11:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
here come my 1st time shoot with CZ1680...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(dinraxxx @ Feb 28 2009, 11:32 PM) Haha bro,you took it today or yesterday?That's a big un-eatable cake at Pavvy.Damn nice.I just got myself something niche yesterday at EpiCentre.later pic spam.Now uploading. tooki it 2day...coz i heard all the photography stuff's price hike next month.....so i go there and buy it b4 any regret incident occur.... |
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 11:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 11:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Mar 1 2009, 10:24 AM) yep.... many users in Taiwan also stuck into these few items.....50mm prime lens so nice....now i dono which to go..CZ1680? 50mm1.4? SAL16105? nuuuuthe poison is running in my blood now.. some elder Alpharian told them to avoid any extra demand, CZ would be a better choice for kit replacement..... coz many Alpharian bought like SAL16105, Tamron 1750 always complain and wanna try others instead..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Mar 1 2009, 10:54 AM) but i scared i will regret later coz 1680 not much different in term of range and f-stop value... whereas 16105 has better range...1750f2.8 has a constant aperture.....50mmf1.4 is a prime lens.. so CZ is definitely suits for those who want the f-stop and range same as the kit loh.....but the sharpness and colors....Zeiss is not normal optics company oh...... |
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 11:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2009, 01:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2009, 01:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(ryzan76 @ Mar 2 2009, 01:06 PM) hallo my alpha fren.................. nice and sharp shots man.....morning at kudat sabah ___________________________________ flickr try use CZ.....i wanna see more shots frm it.... |
|
|
Mar 3 2009, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
so now all alpha stuff price growing up??
i wanna know should i buy a filter for my CZ?? CPL or UV more suits it?? they said when mounting with filter the f-stop will drop...whats that?? This post has been edited by neo_lam: Mar 3 2009, 02:09 AM |
|
|
Mar 3 2009, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
Guys...should i buy a CZ MC filter for my CZ1680??
wats the price for it?? |
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 02:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Mar 4 2009, 12:40 PM) they said the sharpness cannot been differenciate clearly by human eyes.....but the CZ colour is definitely a top-notch...... if the budget is not enough 16-105 still a good choice for kit replacement..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 03:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 04:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 04:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
heres my roughly comparison for CZ1680 and kit lense
1) Kit Lense ![]() 2) CZ1680 ![]() 3) Kit lense 100% crop ![]() 4) CZ 100% crop ![]() all the setting are same only the CZ use wider focal length....the colour and sharpness can differenciate very clearly here.... |
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2009, 06:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Mar 4 2009, 06:14 PM) kit lens suffers distortion...CZ is better..but from the pic..i really cant see the difference unless at 100% crop. Colour is the same...but i guess when shooting flowers/colourful things...CZ will be much better the real picture got much more difference in terms of colours.....nice side by side pic btw.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0402sec
0.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 08:02 AM |