Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies Inception | The Dark Knight director sci-fi pic, Warner Brothers wants Inception 2 ?

views
     
n00b13
post Jul 19 2010, 07:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 19 2010, 05:53 PM)
Ariadne was the architect for all 3 levels. If the dreamer were the architect, why did Cobb employ her to be the architect? She wasn't a dreamer in any of the levels.
Cobb employed her only to design the levels, then teach them to the dreamers. You saw this very quickly in the planning-the-heist montage, in which she briefed Yusuf, Arthur and Eames on their respective levels.

QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 19 2010, 05:53 PM)
Tell me you don't seriously believe that!
Why not? "Contrived" is when things happen for no reason, or for a very artificial reason i.e. to make the movie longer. Cobb told Ariadne never to tell him about the layout, because then Mal would be able to find her way through. That's exactly what happened.


Added on July 19, 2010, 7:21 pm
QUOTE(ReWeR @ Jul 19 2010, 07:14 PM)
Actually the most illogical part is why Saito have to nearly sacrifice his life just to defeat Fischer empire ... come to think of it ... I think it's not worth at all ... you end up in a Limbo just to make your opponent choose to be independence ... what a stupid reason.
He didn't know the job would get so dangerous maa. biggrin.gif



This post has been edited by n00b13: Jul 19 2010, 07:21 PM
n00b13
post Jul 19 2010, 08:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 19 2010, 08:28 PM)
lol who said that? It never crossed my mind that the rain was due to his bladder. I just thought the team were laughing at him because they had to wait for him to take a pee in the dream. But your... theory is funny.
I thought it was quite clear. Level 1 was raining because Yusuf forgot to pee before they entered the dream. You missed that? biggrin.gif

QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 19 2010, 08:28 PM)
That scene was the definition of contrived! Look at the dialogue, it should have been something like this:

"Did Eames add anything extra?"
"No I cant tell you! You cant know the layout of the level!"
"Yes but we dont have time to argue now! Quick, did he or did he not add something?"
"OK yes he added a shortcut."
"OK cool tell Saito that!"

... But instead it was:

"Did Eames add anything extra?"
"No I cant tell you! You cant know the layout of the level!"
"Yes but we dont have time to argue now! Quick, did he or did he not add something?"
"OK yes he added a shortcut. There's some underground tunnel leading straight into the fortress!"
"OK cool tell Saito that! P/S nice of you to tell me where the shortcut is!"

Come on don't deny the real reason there was a "shortcut" was because Nolan wanted Mal to be in there to kill Fischer.
Okay, if you put it that way. But Mal would've appeared anyway, because that's where the story needed to go. Nolan just wanted to cover that base.

n00b13
post Jul 20 2010, 12:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(talexeh @ Jul 20 2010, 12:46 AM)
Most of us saw that both Cobb & Mal were old in their very very deep dream world but when they suicide, they were young. Some of us (too many pages to link to) came up with the opinion that whenever they die, they move a layer up (just like how Arthur when he was killed in the Saito's extraction mission layer 2 woke up in layer 1) so the railway suicide could be their first layer, just before reality.
No, I don't think Mal and Cobb went through multiple layers. I think they went into limbo because they populated their dream world with too many memories.

QUOTE(talexeh @ Jul 20 2010, 12:46 AM)
The Totem
The totem is not a reliable object. Arthur specifically told Ariadne that it's something meant to prove that you're not in someone else's dream... which means that it's not gonna be useful if you're in your own dream.
Good point.

QUOTE(talexeh @ Jul 20 2010, 12:46 AM)
Third Layer
I'm not really sure but whose dream is this supposed to be? Before they went into the third layer, I clearly heard that they're going into Fischer's dream but when they're in third layer, they point to it as Eames dream. rclxub.gif Were they just trying to bluff Fischer since he was just beside them in the third layer?
rclxub.gif

Dammit, now I have to watch again. laugh.gif


n00b13
post Jul 21 2010, 04:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(ate @ Jul 21 2010, 03:51 PM)
cant wait for it to appear in dvd so i can watch more and try to understand this sophisticatedmovie,next month maybe?
Welcome to the club. laugh.gif


n00b13
post Jul 21 2010, 05:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(killdavid @ Jul 21 2010, 05:39 PM)
I feel that this movie is still inferior to The Dark Knight.
I'd agree, but only by a tiny margin.

QUOTE(killdavid @ Jul 21 2010, 05:39 PM)
It is too complicated for its own good. Making such a complicated movie with with its complex dream world physics and rules just opens up more plot holes and questions. In the end it leaves viewers puzzling over its queer dreamworld logic rather than its dramatic scenes or philosophy
This I don't agree. I think it's exactly as complicated as it should be. Viewers aren't puzzling over it; we're talking about it, working out the complexities of its physics and rules as well as its dramatic scenes and philosophies. This is very much part of its appeal. Few movies have that effect. Even fewer movies are intended to have that effect.


n00b13
post Jul 21 2010, 06:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Kyoyagami @ Jul 21 2010, 06:00 PM)
Why the feel of inferior?
Because The Dark Knight was gripping from start to finish. Inception, I thought it felt a bit draggy towards the end - too many shootout scenes in the snow.


Added on July 21, 2010, 6:33 pm
QUOTE(killdavid @ Jul 21 2010, 06:04 PM)
Fair enough. I like TDK better because it brings into focus deep seated personal conflicts, morality, deranged or misguided believes. The are more to the subject of humanities.

But for Inception, everyone is taking about what they think is happening and presenting their case with supporting interpretations of the dream world logic. Don't these all belong in a Star Trek convention ?

** Runs for cover ***
But we are talking about the humanities of Inception. I posted an interpretation of the film from a karma point of view, that Cobb and Saito are actually bad guys and that they deserve what they got. Perhaps people aren't talking about this as much as the plot complexities, but it's there in the movie.



This post has been edited by n00b13: Jul 21 2010, 06:33 PM
n00b13
post Jul 21 2010, 06:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 21 2010, 06:42 PM)
Dude the action scenes just plain sucked!
As I said in my review, no, they didn't. They were perfectly competent. They were just a little too long-winded towards the end.


n00b13
post Jul 22 2010, 01:58 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 21 2010, 11:21 PM)
Well the action in Batman Begins sucked as well. He improved in TDK, though most people still say the action there sucked. I dunno, but I liked the prison transfer sequence in TDK. Certain parts of it lacked a visual grasp but for the most part it was tense and chaotic... in a good way, I felt. It had three of the film's coolest moments too- Batpod emerging from the Tumbler wreckage, the semi truck doing the flip, and the batpod doing a different flip off the wall. The other fight scenes in TDK dont fare as good in my books, although I found them more watchable in repeat viewings.
Weird thing about Nolan. This is his second movie in which he saves the best action scene for the middle. laugh.gif


Added on July 22, 2010, 2:08 am
QUOTE(Calvin871989 @ Jul 22 2010, 12:50 AM)
Inception’s Dileep Rao Answers All Your Questions About Inception : http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/...ao_answers.html
QUOTE
Digging a little deeper into the story now, can you walk me through whose dream is whose?
Okay. So first there's reality. We get on the plane. We go to sleep. Then we're in my dream, Yusuf's dream. Because my pee urge causes it to rain. That's how I see it. The architecture is Ariadne's (Ellen Page's) design, but it's my dream. Then we drop down a level and go to the bar, to the hotel. I think we're in Arthur's (Joseph Gorden-Levitt's) dream at that point. Then — this is where it gets mind-bending — we drop down into Fischer's (Cillian Murphy's) dream, even though he thinks they're going to Browning's (Tom Berenger's) dream.

There seems to be a rule of thumb, then, that whoever "sticks around" in a level, that person had to be the dreamer, right? It's why you're stuck driving the van and Joseph Gordon-Levitt chills out in the hotel.
I think that's a great signifier and it makes the most sense, because how the hell would it continue on that level if the person who was dreaming took off?

But that made me think the third level, the snow fort, was Eames's (Tom Hardy's) dream.
Except in the hotel room, Ellen Page asks whose subconscious we're going into, and Cobb answers, "Fischer's."

You're right, it has to be Fischer's, because that's the level where they're planning to do the inception. That also means that in the hotel room, when Browning is talking to Fischer, we're actually watching —
— an internal debate going on in Fischer's mind. He's filling Joseph Gordon-Levitt's dream with his subconscious. And then one level down, in the snow of his own mind, he drops down to limbo when he dies, which means your rule of thumb isn't quite right. Because Mal shoots him, which means Cobb's own subconscious has taken Fischer to limbo.


I disagree with him on that part. I think how dream-sharing works is that there is a dreamer, but there is also a subject. The dreamer is in control of the dream, but it's the subject's subconscious that is being explored - remember in the Paris dream, the environment was Ariadne's but the people were Cobb's. In a mind-heist, the mark is always the subject, never the dreamer. So yes, they were going into Fischer's subconscious, but via Eames' dream.

I think... rclxub.gif



This post has been edited by n00b13: Jul 22 2010, 02:08 AM
n00b13
post Jul 22 2010, 03:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(beandy @ Jul 22 2010, 02:31 PM)
What a smart arse director which make me and me alone in the entire world wont watch his work ever again
Fixed. laugh.gif


n00b13
post Jul 22 2010, 03:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(lycaphim @ Jul 22 2010, 03:28 PM)
Funny how people always take fiction way too seriously, but of course, everyone has the right to ponder the meaning of a work.
Who, exactly, is taking this too seriously?

All I see is people enjoying a discussion of the film, and a couple of trolls.


n00b13
post Jul 26 2010, 10:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Krovaxq @ Jul 26 2010, 09:31 PM)
yay rili? im gonna dl the fountain then biggrin.gif

ive watched

inception
dark city
space odyssey
13th floor
insomnia
memento
the prestige
following
doodlebug <--- lol seriously.
You should check out Primer. smile.gif
n00b13
post Jul 27 2010, 03:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(coffeebreak @ Jul 27 2010, 09:03 AM)
i saw the movie and i dont understand the inception part~ whats the idea they planted? asking him to be himself? how does that make him destroy the empire ?
Telling him to "be himself", meaning to not try to follow in his father's footsteps. Meaning to not carry on the empire his father built.


Added on July 27, 2010, 3:17 pm
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Jul 27 2010, 10:56 AM)
Moreover comparison made between Inception and The Matrix - personally i think Inception dont come even close. Its just a normal scifi thriller to me. While the Matrix left me flabbergasted while and after the movie for years.
But Inception doesn't have two crappy sequels. biggrin.gif

...yet.



This post has been edited by n00b13: Jul 27 2010, 03:17 PM
n00b13
post Jul 28 2010, 09:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(dlct87 @ Jul 28 2010, 08:48 PM)
2. Miles was Mal's dad, so he's Cobb's father in law, and the reason he's in LA because Cobb wants him to bring the toy to his children
Father-in-law British. Wife French. Husband American. laugh.gif


n00b13
post Aug 12 2010, 11:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(jenniferjen @ Aug 12 2010, 10:12 AM)
I was thinking, why inception is so hard to do, they do explain it, but i cant really get what they really mean.

For me, is totally possible, like how i infiltrate your dream, and tell you tomorrow Sport Toto first grand prize is this number, and when you wake up, i am 100% sure you are going to go buy the number. Wasn't that call inception? I put an idea into you, you believe is true and do it in reality?

What so hard about inception? lol
The movie explained this already. It's not just telling you things in your dream, it's making you think you thought of it yourself.



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0458sec    0.29    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 04:57 AM