replicants??

Maybe?

But the film is pretty much straight forward. Easy to identify whether which is real or not. Of course, the ending does leave it to interpretation...

If say...



And if say...



But we can't satisfy everyone to say "hey, that movie is the best". After all, weren't there someone from here said "The Dark Knight" isn't that great?

i failed to understand A Space Odyssey...... sob...the ending part, i totally had no clue...

The infamous debate of all time...

I would believe...

I never understood the monkey part that picks up the bone and keeps whacking

Guys, lets not turn this to a Blade Runner debate instead. Lets do that in a Mind Bending movie thread.

I've got dibs on Fight Club.

I watch Blade Runner before. It has a conclusion. And it is satisfiable.

Also, Inception have conclusion. But you all screw it up!!!

---

Added on July 30, 2010, 5:24 pmyes, it is straight forward... until some genius turn this into critical discussion...

This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 30 2010, 05:24 PM

i never got the whole ideas of th monkeys like at all...was it trying to show us about revolution? about how they develop anger and brute? how the blunt weapon bone started? while before that they were defenseless?(attacked by cheetah)... n the steel bar alike thing... omg it hurts my brain =.=!!

Calm down... this is meant to discuss, not to be serious. But good to discuss at least can share opinions...

Oh about Blade Runner - which version you watch?

Two of the endings were forced...

This post has been edited by hairyLGS: Jul 30 2010, 05:26 PM

OOOO... another debatable film...



So, what you want to share about Fight Club?

---

Added on July 30, 2010, 5:29 pmSomething like that... and it's all Monolith fault

But what I believe the director intended it to be was that if that monolith never appear, we will never evolve completely. Hence, how one monkey touched the monolith and got the idea of a bone can be use a weapon and how he can show his anger by using the weapon.

It's not that hard... just that the whacking part is too much... but the music is epic

This post has been edited by hairyLGS: Jul 30 2010, 05:29 PM

the music... huaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargghhhh aaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ahhhhhhhhhhh aaaaaaaaaaaaaa arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr hhhhhhhhh fffffffffffffffffffffffffffff


my final say on this, i was defeated at this movie...like completely.

i gave up haha...

I took the third ending.

lol... I accepted your ending...

Its also the creator of Lost's ending.

HAHAHAH good spot man. precisely. saito died in level 3. after he threw the grenade remember. so he went to limbo. he was never connected to the machine ariadne and cobb used to get to level 4

(the world cobb and mal built. contrary to what alot of others think that is not limbo. it is just a recreation of the limbo world they built based on cobb's memory. why? cos they used the machine in level 3 to get to the next level. therefore they were dreaming, they didnt die)

therefore the end could never be reality

so there are 2 theories i came up with:
1. cobb went into limbo when he woke up in the plane (shot by old saito, which was a projection)
2. cobb went into limbo when he woke up at the beach (in the end saito (which was also a projection) shot himself and cobb wakes up in a plane, but that is still limbo. cos according to what they said, limbo is a stage of unrestricted dreams where anything can happen)


and yes, the time fold concept, if u go a level deeper, time is longer. exponentially longer. and injuries get better too. they're still there, but they get better. and the kicks are dulled. for eg. a kick in level 1 wont reach a person in level 2. thats y they timed simultaneous kicks which ariadne used perfectly to escape from all the dreams as she fell.

and mal. mal was a projection of cobb. same as the train, same as the kids, same as the broken glass. they're all his subconscious threatening to burst out cos he already lost his sense of whats reality and whats a dream

This post has been edited by b3ta: Jul 30 2010, 05:59 PM

It's no longer a debate since Scott has given his RM 0.02 on the issue.

Yeah, but no need to have a sequel.
Just show a "special edition" version later with extra few seconds shots on that particular spinning top will do.
Seems same like avatar doing a special edition. Lol.

i dont really like the dark knight...it's just too overrated

yalor.... I see its just normal nice movie...