RM5.5k only for the G

the same method on how someone speculated about 24-105G SSM last time, scanned from manual... heheh
but the funny thing is, all of them sounds like the wishlist of many people... cut and paste job is quite easy actually

so far there's only 3 lenses leaked through Sony's own inventory,
SAL1024 10-24mm f3.5-4.5
SAL70300 70-300mm f4-5.6
SAL50F18 50mm f1.8

All the other list came out on the web are just a bunch of rumours, speculations, or merely wishlists.

If this lens come out it will kill the market for Carl Zeiss 16-80 f3.5-4.5... unless Sony plan to discontinue the 1680.

This post has been edited by soulfly: Jan 25 2009, 08:08 PM

Shot with IR (850nm) filter, colour channel swapped in photoshop.
Ghosting was all over the place especially when the sun is directly in the center of the frame. I think it's due to cheapo IR filter.

the Sig1770 is definitely attractive in terms of the image quality it produces compare to kitlens. My only concern is the build quality.

Benro A300EX is slightly less than RM300 from Yamiya including delivery. Best bang for the buck.

KM never made 35-70, it is not a Konica Minolta lens.

personally i feel 3rd party flash is not worth to get. a lot of people who purchased a 3rd party flash will end up buying original flash sooner or later. sony flash is already cheap, why buy 3rd party?

either one also can
i've been using F42 all these while without problem
although i'm gonna get the F58 for its higher power output

many old lenses got

albnok, the RM4800 street price is ridiculously cheap but awesome... compare to suggested retail price at RM5999.... that's like over RM1k difference. anybody knows EF135 f2L street price?

The purpose of GND is to improve the dynamic range of your photo, reducing exposure on certain portion of your composition... something which CPL cannot do.

filters comes in 2 types... circular (the ones we often see) or slot in (square glass) via adapter like Cokin filter system

You have a budget of RM4k.... nothing beats the image quality of Sony Carl Zeiss 16-80mm.

If you want a wider lens, you might wanna wait for Sony 10-24mm.

SAL16105 also not bad... almost similar performance than the CZ. Both are DT lenses, which means they're not full frame lenses.

CZ 16-35 f2.8 is a full frame lens, but price would be around 5k-ish... like CZ 24-70 f2.8

who? where? which thread?

calling someone a whore in the forum is definitely a personal attack and nothing to do with constructive discussion or criticism.

This post has been edited by soulfly: Feb 9 2009, 01:58 PM

Eh.... tonite ka the girls go tikam buah oren into the river?

Even if you have a fast lens, large aperture will cause lack of depth of field. You'll still need to stop down to like f6.3~f8 to capture more depth of field. So in this case, fast lens is not that much useful, unless you want to shoot a specific subject/item. But not so if you wanna shoot a scenery with a lot of stuff in it.