If this lens come out it will kill the market for Carl Zeiss 16-80 f3.5-4.5... unless Sony plan to discontinue the 1680.

to all..i was wondering..how to copy a picture here??last time i try to copy the html here..but it does not work??can anyone teach me how to post a picture here??plz...

oo ok.. thanks ya..

come on, streamyx, come onn!!!

haha.. u quoted me from last thread
thanks ya bro!

is a series of vids?

I doubt the CZ 16-80mm f3.5-4.5 IQ can beat the Tammy 17-50mm f2.8 in terms of sharpness at wide open.

Any link to prove your statement above?

soft at 2.8? could it be that u focus wrongly?

Would love to see a reliable comparison link before jumping to the conclusion

i would like to see the comparison too since i'm planning to find my kitlens replacement.

Btw,I bought Maha PowerEx from shashiki,but the model out of stock... C204W,anybody has idea how long do they need to deliver this "special order item"?? 

thats from my eyes la..soft at f2.8, will sharp at f4 and above, as it was not my lens, therefore i cant give a full conclusion on the lens..focus wrongly will have out of focus part, not soft..

correct me ifim wrong using the terms of softness and sharpness..

and for the price wise, i still vote for tamron 17-50mm f2.8..

In terms of spec, D300 anytime. Unless you wanna pick those teeny-weeny features to compare. Oh ya. One advise from you. When you are asking for comparison, always ask from every side which are involved. That will make you judge better rather then listening to just one side.

Just like, on the other hand, you'll get this reply about A900 and Sony.


Yea, thanks for being the morning clown. I'm quite amused. You might wanna brush up ya England a little bit more unless you plan to continue making fun of yourself.
Perhaps you could share the conversation between you and the seller here so that we can avoid that seller in future?

Sad to say you still don't understand the meaning of doubt.   
Why are you so cooked up over this? Is it wrong to post what others comment about something? Some people might say that Sony is god-like, some might think that it's just another piece of thrash. Whether they say it's good or not, it's up to you to digest. Don't tell me you are those who can't accept what others comment? or your ears only welcome good points of the brand you are using? Do ponder about it.

Is it wrong to post what others comment about something?

Erk, how do I know what you guys commented on D3 and D700. Or would you like to share your opinion on one if you had owned one before?

No, all I can recall was

1. Someone posted his personal opinions about D3 and D700 in Sony's thread
2. I quoted that and seek explanation from Nikonians
3. Nikonians replied. You got heated up?

im also get that sky type scenario. im also shoot it at perak. shoot it at sungkai,perak. the sky that day very unique kan..
here mine..