hence uncle ianho will be creating V21 for us!

aik...already small ka ur siggie...???should write something like mine la bro....

---

Added on February 11, 2009, 10:16 ampix spam for today....C&C appreciated.....



This post has been edited by hazril: Feb 11 2009, 10:16 AM

direct flash ker??
kaler kulit nampak too orange ler
takder masuk kilang PP ker gambar tue



p/s:ops...dia nuke lagi siggie tue..hahahaha...biar dia nuke...bukan takleh letak balik

Hi Sifus!

Need to ask your opinions, I'm planning to get a 18200 lens for my Sony A300.

Am not very sure how to differentiate the specs of the lenses.

So wanna ask, which of the above lens should I consider?

Want something versatile with Macro and Zoom capabilities up to 200mm.

Please help me. Thanks.

Why not you consider the Sony 18-250? It is a versatile and sharp lens. Ask shootkk, he got one.

yeah la.. too orangey to my eyes.. if warm is okay la to tell how actually the place lights are..

i dun think dat is direct flash la.. coz can see shadow of right sleeve at bottom.. must be bounced then..

no flash bro...direct from camera...exif still intact...tak reti nak PP lg...maybe WB aku out kot....lampu mcd kan satu mcm sket....

p/s:bak kata member aku la kan....go and die...kalo tak paham nih aku translate...gi dan mampos....

---

Added on February 11, 2009, 11:03 amaiyo...i dont have enuff money yet to buy flash la din....no flash involved in this pic.....hehehehehehe....

This post has been edited by hazril: Feb 11 2009, 11:03 AM

ceh.. no flash ka?? AWB punya kerja la nih...

no flash ?? torchlight oso can...

This post has been edited by dingenius3: Feb 11 2009, 11:06 AM

gabriellai: I did not say the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 wins over the Tamron equivalent.

The Sigma has HSM so it will not have gear stripping.

Tamron gear stripping is pretty much unheard of.

The Tamron is indeed sharp but to be fair until we test it in A-mount we cannot say about focusing accuracy. The Tamron with micro-motor for Canon and Nikon have been complained about.

Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 shots: http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1218
Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 shots: http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1078

AlphaBeta: DRO is for high-contrast situations e.g. bright sky dark subject in low ISO settings. Turn off DRO in the dark; it would kill the contrast and increase noise.

neo_lam: Yes, as long as the batteries are the same type as supported by the charger, it will work. Everything is NiMh now anyway, those old NiCd batteries are hard to find and low in mAh rating.

If you bought an old charger that comes with 1600 mAh batteries, it will still charge 2500 mAh ones. It will just take longer.

vandechrome has got the math right!

ianho, welcome back!

tight framing...
in ur picture, a space on top of her head and ur chop her hand is not so good..
if wanna do tight, dont left a space but dont chop anything esp hand..
just my 2 cent...

hmm...
i think SAL18250 is better...
price just a bit expensive than SAL18200...
the IQ, u can see the shootkk's flickr as he use SAL18250...then u can judge urself

yup...keje sape lg...still not very good at WB yet la....need some pointers on WB...

thanx for the comment bro...will keep that in mind....

Woi!! I heard my name ler....

visigoth90: Wokeh! As I would normally do, I would recommend the SAL18250 over the SAL18200 and the Tammy 18250 and Tammy 18200 and Sigma 18200.

It's a nice all-in-one lens. Great for travel, outdoors. For indoors, use flash ler... hehe...

It's not a macro lens so if you wanna do macro, should look at dedicated macro lens but it's useful for close-ups.

Link to my flickr in my signature.... if you wanna see pics. Some taken with my only other lens - the KM 50mm F/1.7 but all exifs intact.

albert: you mentioned that "Turn off DRO in the dark; it would kill the contrast and increase noise", i tot turning of DRO in dark and high iso will reduce the noise? please advise when to turn off the DRO please.

Pay www.dyxum.com a visit, its very handy for your research

When albert said "Turn off DRO in the dark; it would kill the contrast and increase noise", it means that "Turn off DRO in the dark because DRO will kill the contrast and increase noise"

Of course, this is through my understanding of the sentence

lol...sentence has been restructured...i think the best would be to provide an example with DRO on and DRO off...

meaning turning off DRO in the dark will kill the contract and kill the increase of noise(reduce noise)?

I think by now you know that DRO will slightly increase the brightness of the object. By means of brightness in camera software, you also by now know that higher ISO, the picture brighter... so noise increase. Higher brightness will also make the photo less contrast

turning off DRO will not kill anything, just that without DRO, means without camera software to increase the brightness of the object... means there is no contrast to kill, and no noise to kill

hold on ar... i try to shoot with and without DRO, but I doubt my alpha 350 would be the best DRO because it is not like the big ones that goes to level 5

Welcome newcomer!?

hmmm SAL 18250 not bad...might get this next year..
i might consider CZ 1680 too...