QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
wow tender, rm 130+ for a book. I admire your tenacity
What book was tat?
That was Pauline Kael's For Keeps not SF.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
Hey, as I said earlier, I got inspired by this forum's recommendations and Guy G. Kay was one of the authors I looked up. I am now proud owner of Lord of Emperors and now hunting for Book 1.
Glad to hear that, and hope you like it. they are still good as stand alones.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
I don't mind the usual elves sorcery etc. It is the story weaving and what did the author do with the characters that will get me hooked. But you are right too as in there are a lot of authors with the formulaic Tolkien-esque story. Blur boy/girl with secret, got swept up in events where he/she has no idea what is going on, why-me phase, a old wizard dude came along and teach the way of the Force, suddenly boy/girl turns out to be extremely powerful and is reluctantly (but successfully) saving the world from The Evil One. Some of them are extremely boring (Brisinger) while some are fantastic.
Yeah, i get you. actually i am not even a fan of Perdido Street Station or China Mieville. Just that he is one of those guy who champion breaking the formula and i admire him for it. Of course story weaving is the most important aspect of it all. i have come across some Star Wars/Trek, Dragonlance, D&D, Forgotten Realms, RPG Franchise and many such comercially milkable SF books that are surprisingly good reads. and i really don't mind reading another sword & socery, they are so easy to get into, ,quick and easy to finish reading.
my view is that, if its our first 50 fantasies, R A Salvatore, David Eddings, Terry Goodkind, Dragonlance (1st and 2nd Trilogy), Piers Anthony, Anne McCaffrey and such will blow you away. later on, depending on our taste, Robert Jordan, Stephen Donaldson, George R R Martin, Steven Erikson and many more are all super solid. but after reading them all, there have to be a few that we love most. for me, they are Robin Hobb, Gene Wolfe (Book of the New Sun), Guy Gavriel Kay and a few others.
like Dan Simmons said in an interview, "In a larger sense though, even my "series" such as the four Hyperion novels and the Ilium\Olympos two-volume tale are "stand alones" in the sense that I will finish the story and then never dilute it by tacking on my own sequels or sharecropping them out to other authors. I truly hate that whole idea. This is made relevant only by the fact that I probably could have spent the rest of my life and writing career writing "sequels" to the very popular Hyperion novels -- and probably would have been paid very well to do so -- but even the idea of being stuck in such a rut appalls me.
I like what I once heard Harlan Elison say to a group -- "I'd be satisfied if my literary obituary starts -- 'He never popped out of the same hole twice.'" That would satisfy me as well. "
Most respectable writers will want to write something new. tho not 100% true, but thats a rough guide to choose good writers and good books. after all, exciting new world (world building) is one of the reason why we love fantasy. tho the urge for fans to revisit the same old world is understandable.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
For fantasy slightly different, have you tried :
- Jasper Fforde's books. Most classified him as fiction because it has contemporary setting but I think you can call it fantasy too. Genre line getting blurred.
haven read him yet, i tend to be slower to read contemporary or literary works (or works by writers who dont think they are writing SF), like those by Margaret Atwood. heard Fforde's good. will try him someday.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
- Kushiel's Dart - about a woman who likes pain. So-so veering to the nice side.

Uhm, thanks for the recommendation, i will propably-definitely read it, if only for the, errr so very different sex scene.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
- Feist's Daughter of Empire Series. My introduction to political intrigue-based story. I reread it 3 times,that's how much I like them. For some reason, I never really like his Magician series (*dodge brickbats*), never understood its popularity.
i never understood its popularity too. tho his world building is solid and his magic system is one of the best. i never like riftwar saga and such. heard Daughter of Empire was superb very long ago, but after many Feist's solid but not really my type book, i am slow to read him again.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
- Lies of Locke Lamora. Ok, I read Bk2 Under the Red Skies but not Bk1 (bad habit). About thieves. No dragons or elves so far. More of adventure type, not a good-vs-evil-apocalypse story.
Wikied it. sounds like the thing i like, will definitely read it soon. many books i start from bk2 or 3 too, pretty good way to tell if a series is good or not.
QUOTE(Persephone @ Oct 15 2009, 11:23 PM)
Ash by Mary Gentle, Jonathan Norell by Susanne Clarke, the Malazans etc that I havent read.
I noticed you earlier heaped praise on Neal S. I was tempted by Quicksilver but it looks like it require a lot of free time and concentration. something I lacked now. Which of his books should I start with?
Ash: A Secret History, is one of those (among many other fantasy) very complex, mighty well written books that i tried to read but couldn't finish. they are just not my cup of tea. i got Jonathan Norell but haven't read it too. Malazan Book of the Fallen is super hardcore fantasy that i really liked. read till book 3 but left it for so long that i forgot the plot -- which was more complex than particle physics. which is lots better than Wheel of Time, read till book 10 but i forgot the plot and its exasperating to reread the whole thing. if you haven't read any book of Neal S., Snow Crash or Diamond Age are great to start with. both easy read and super cool. if you like him, then move on to his other books.
This post has been edited by tender: Oct 18 2009, 12:22 AM