in today's car tint... UV rejection is almost a GIVEN, and it has been a simple standard that UV rejection is expected.

if you noticed, most car tint on the market today have 99% UV rejection (with the exception on those colored plastic used to wrapped easter eggs!)

car windshield, being made of glass, are natural UV shield by itself.. so expecting more and more UV protection from a tint is almost "unnecessary" to most people (unless you have a symptom which you're allergic to UV rays)

the quality battle today falls on workmanship, visibility and heat rejection versus cost. alot of people always have this "default" idea/mentality that expensive = good.. and that's how expensive brands are able to retain it's exorbitant pricing strategy for so long..

This post has been edited by Tikietic: Aug 13 2010, 10:26 AM