Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

48 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Best Computer Multimedia Speaker You Ever Had, Come on vote

views
     
hans7474
post Feb 20 2011, 01:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Calabasas, California


i have sonic gear evo 5 and using it for the pass 2 years..very good quality and durability..but i wan altec lansing next nod.gif
herojack41
post Feb 20 2011, 08:42 AM

Master Of Trouble Maker
*******
Senior Member
5,697 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist



QUOTE(hans7474 @ Feb 20 2011, 01:25 AM)
i have sonic gear evo 5 and using it for the pass 2 years..very good quality and durability..but i wan altec lansing next  nod.gif
*
brows.gif which model brows.gif 5.1 channel? brows.gif

well....altec lansing atp3 sound quality are really gooding but not the woofer sad.gif

This post has been edited by herojack41: Feb 20 2011, 08:45 AM
crusher
post Feb 21 2011, 03:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


i've been using sonic gear BT2 since 2008 till now, and alter lansing V4121 since year 2002 till now. lol. loving both biggrin.gif
derrick1988
post Feb 21 2011, 04:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Melaka / Seremban
I just bought altec lansing Octane7, quite nice with a powerful sound.
ravewar
post Feb 28 2011, 12:15 AM

*Retired Drifter & M-ITX Fan*
****
Senior Member
686 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


voted for edifier.

been running the m1335 for quite sometime. never fails. cheap and cheerful. biggrin.gif
kevin613
post Mar 1 2011, 11:59 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,236 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: BB Bangi


Voted for Edifier... had the S2.1D, and recently the S530, good sound for the price i paid.. the S530 is connected permanently to my HTPC/TV now as my living room audio..
-kytz-
post Mar 1 2011, 12:03 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(kevin613 @ Mar 1 2011, 11:59 AM)
Voted for Edifier... had the S2.1D, and recently the S530, good sound for the price i paid.. the S530 is connected permanently to my HTPC/TV now as my living room audio..
*
And it still sounds good?

I'm surprised because PC speakers work best within a very short distance like 2-3 feet, because anything further than that you lose a lot of details, dynamic range, clarity,bass,etc. And also because, PC speakers aren't even designed to drive sound to the whole room, what more for a distance of let's say 8-10 feet?
kevin613
post Mar 1 2011, 12:42 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,236 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: BB Bangi


QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 1 2011, 12:03 PM)
And it still sounds good?

I'm surprised because PC speakers work best within a very short distance like 2-3 feet, because anything further than that you lose a lot of details, dynamic range, clarity,bass,etc. And also because, PC speakers aren't even designed to drive sound to the whole room, what more for a distance of let's say 8-10 feet?
*
i think the S530 is not just another set of PC speakers.. try them if you havent heard them..
i personally found it to be good, and in fact better than those sub RM1k HTIB set, as most of those are using only a single full range driver with a big woofer housing a tiny sub. Sub is powerful, but not boomy, and sats are reproducing the mids nicely... and also the fact that i like it to be made of wooden MDF housing for all speakers..

check the specs for s530 below

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by kevin613: Mar 1 2011, 12:46 PM
lex
post Mar 2 2011, 05:53 AM

Old Am I?
Group Icon
VIP
18,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Dagobah
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 1 2011, 12:03 PM)
And it still sounds good?

I'm surprised because PC speakers work best within a very short distance like 2-3 feet, because anything further than that you lose a lot of details, dynamic range, clarity,bass,etc. And also because, PC speakers aren't even designed to drive sound to the whole room, what more for a distance of let's say 8-10 feet?
That depends on the output power (or wattage). Nowadays many PC speakers are not the tiny "multimedia speakers" of yesteryears. Many are already quite powerful (looking at the RMS wattage, not the marketing "PMPO" one). flex.gif

This post has been edited by lex: Mar 2 2011, 05:54 AM
empire23
post Mar 2 2011, 11:14 AM

Team Island Hopper
Group Icon
Staff
9,417 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory
QUOTE(lex @ Mar 2 2011, 05:53 AM)
That depends on the output power (or wattage). Nowadays many PC speakers are not the tiny "multimedia speakers" of yesteryears. Many are already quite powerful (looking at the RMS wattage, not the marketing "PMPO" one). flex.gif
*
Not really. Power isn't the issue most of the time. Do note that speakers are optimized for "throw" meaning due to the inherent design, there is a sweet spot in regards to distortion and frequency response (maybe HTF) in regards to direction and distance. Getting to know the "field" of a pair of speakers is often more important than other characteristics.

You have very near fields like the Klipsch Promedia 2.0 Ultra, Bowers and Wilkins MM-1, Harman Kadons GLA-55 and so forth with very tight sweet spots of about 1 to 1.5 meters, with mid field compensated systems such as powered monitors like the M-Audio DSM3, the sweet spot extends to 2 to 4 meters. Knowing where to sit is crucial to knowing what you want wink.gif
chenhui87
post Mar 2 2011, 11:23 AM

♥Jigeumeun So Nyuh Shi Dae♥
*******
Senior Member
2,150 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: 首尔



logitech z5500~~~
SUSMatrix
post Mar 2 2011, 11:47 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


Failed poll....most of them sucks....Edifier, Sonic Gear, Altec...yuck...


I vote for Aego-M. smile.gif
lex
post Mar 2 2011, 04:39 PM

Old Am I?
Group Icon
VIP
18,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Dagobah
QUOTE(empire23 @ Mar 2 2011, 11:14 AM)
Not really. Power isn't the issue most of the time. Do note that speakers are optimized for "throw" meaning due to the inherent design, there is a sweet spot in regards to distortion and frequency response (maybe HTF) in regards to direction and distance. Getting to know the "field" of a pair of speakers is often more important than other characteristics.
As for the sweet spot thingy, there are also other considerations such as speaker design/hardware (especially the tweeters), speaker positioning, distance between the speakers, listening room characteristics, and amplifier matching. hmm.gif

QUOTE(empire23 @ Mar 2 2011, 11:14 AM)
You have very near fields like the Klipsch Promedia 2.0 Ultra, Bowers and Wilkins MM-1, Harman Kadons GLA-55 and so forth with very tight sweet spots of about 1 to 1.5 meters, with mid field compensated systems such as powered monitors like the M-Audio DSM3, the sweet spot extends to 2 to 4 meters. Knowing where to sit is crucial to knowing what you want  wink.gif
With certain high end monitors, sitting position isn't very crucial as those speakers have great transparency, expansive sound stage and stereo imaging (as well as literally can fill the whole room, and the sounds seems to be everywhere rather than from the speakers themselves). Notably System Audio ones have these characteristics. brows.gif

This post has been edited by lex: Mar 2 2011, 04:46 PM
empire23
post Mar 3 2011, 03:17 AM

Team Island Hopper
Group Icon
Staff
9,417 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory
QUOTE(lex @ Mar 2 2011, 04:39 PM)
As for the sweet spot thingy, there are also other considerations such as speaker design/hardware (especially the tweeters), speaker positioning, distance between the speakers, listening room characteristics, and amplifier matching. hmm.gif

With certain high end monitors, sitting position isn't very crucial as those speakers have great transparency, expansive sound stage and stereo imaging (as well as literally can fill the whole room, and the sounds seems to be everywhere rather than from the speakers themselves). Notably System Audio ones have these characteristics. brows.gif
*
Generally the first parts will be factored in by the manufacturer and all have a configuration that delivers optimal performance. Plus most multimedia speakers are self powered and don't work with amps.

Positioning and so forth will depend on what the manufacturer wants from the speaker. Increasing the size of the soundstage and reducing directionality often increases distortion in certain harmonics and so forth. Much like any other form of engineering, not such thing as a free lunch lol.

But I do serious audio with my HD650s, my own amps and my standalone DACs. Enjoying the new DAC1 USB I just go though. MM-1 does fine for gaming.

This post has been edited by empire23: Mar 3 2011, 03:22 AM
lex
post Mar 3 2011, 07:48 PM

Old Am I?
Group Icon
VIP
18,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Dagobah
QUOTE(empire23 @ Mar 3 2011, 03:17 AM)
Generally the first parts will be factored in by the manufacturer and all have a configuration that delivers optimal performance. Plus most multimedia speakers are self powered and don't work with amps.
However depending on design, quite a number of "multimedia speakers" can interchange parts as well... such as the satellite speakers. Replacing a single driver (full range) with a 2-way driver (tweeter and mid-randge) can significantly improve the sound especially bringing out the highs. Of course, one criteria when changing speakers is impedance matching. hmm.gif

QUOTE(empire23 @ Mar 3 2011, 03:17 AM)
Positioning and so forth will depend on what the manufacturer wants from the speaker. Increasing the size of the soundstage and reducing directionality often increases distortion in certain harmonics and so forth. Much like any other form of engineering, not such thing as a free lunch lol.
I'd heard those SA speakers before, and I must say their sound stage is pretty accurate actually (can even tell and point out the direction/source of each sound) while filling the room (forward sounding). In comparison with others (e.g. the usual Mission, KEF, JBL, Harmon Kardon, etc), not even close to its performance. But the price of those SAs are out of my range. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by lex: Mar 3 2011, 08:14 PM
sevn
post Mar 4 2011, 09:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
75 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur

i have a creative 5.1 since 2004..its like that 7 years?? hohoho its sure still good!
qwerty79
post Apr 4 2011, 01:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,907 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Pahang



User of S5.1 since 2006. Use it for my home theater. Really good set of speaker.
udin901
post Apr 5 2011, 10:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
743 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Penang



mine is m3300...xD best ive ever had..
clawhammer
post Apr 6 2011, 07:35 PM

///M
Group Icon
VIP
8,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur




I miss my Klipsch Promedia GMX smile.gif that's one of the best so far.
kianweic
post Apr 6 2011, 09:06 PM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


QUOTE(clawhammer @ Apr 6 2011, 07:35 PM)
I miss my Klipsch Promedia GMX smile.gif that's one of the best so far.
*
What happened to yours?

48 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0553sec    1.00    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 11:05 PM