Hey guys, just a little side notes just for the lulz

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/foo...icle5474171.ece

He really geng, on and off the pitch, hahahaha.


Anyway, I dont mind AW signing Ashavin actually, as long that he can really be deadly, cause after we lost Hleb, there no player that actually can bring the ball into the opponent penalty box effective enough, the closest we have would be Nasri.

And on the side note, due to the reason that Rosicky would be able to play in the center of midfield, I think AW would keep him. Just hope that he would recover before Fabregas and play in that position to show his real worth, cause I always know he is a good player, just he get injured to easily lately.

If we can constantly win with that score line and win the EPL and UCL and all those other, I dont mind reverting back to that, which actually was very famous for Arsenal in the past, hahaha.

---

Added on January 11, 2009, 2:27 amActually u see a lot of square passes in our games this season, dont know why, but if compare to last season, our striker was taking their chances better than last season. This season our strikers are a bit sharper but our passing are square, while last season our passing was near god like but our striker was not taking the chances well enough, I wonder why

This post has been edited by jim18992: Jan 11 2009, 02:27 AM

Podolski is a striker right? that what I remember I dont see why we need another striker, cause if we did get Ashavin, we will have more then enough striker, though I know AW wont play Ashavin as a striker if we get him. Let see, currently we have Ade, RvP, Eduardo, Vela, Benther and Walcott, that like 6 player that can play in that position

Though if I was playing FM, I would hijack that sales, and get the player and use him when I want or let him play in the reserve or sacrifice one of my current striker, but real life not as easy as FM life

This post has been edited by jim18992: Jan 11 2009, 06:15 PM

Mean we need to consistently bashing him, then he will consistently perform and score

But anyway, I have faith that we going to catch up with Villa, if not, and I mean with a big IF, then guess UCL this season would be a must winner.

Ya, i do agree that not playing in the UCL is not end of the world, but it just dont feel right if dont get to see Arsenal in UCL every season, specially after qualifying for it for so many season already.

This post has been edited by jim18992: Jan 11 2009, 11:24 PM

Yup, they are working without a natural DM, but they still play well, guess the reason is because their attacking players are more direct, and can really penetrate defenses. Guess the old saying of the greatest defense is attack is true. But guess a strong back four also needed

Hahaha, yup, plus, the tempo is high, the temper is high also, hahahaha. Plus, the corner they taken, score, but need to retake the corner again, and yet it still score But anyway, u know, among the players that MU have, I always wish that Park is our player, he is very hardworking

Hahaha, but guess Chelsea is fated to concede that goal That really show that the heat is really high in that game, which is kind of a good thing for us as neutral to watch Though as Arsenal fan, we wish them to draw

Hahaha, I think it not offensive to say that.

Agree, Park is like MU Flamini, sad that we lose Flamini actually. You know, in the summer, I always feel, if we lose Hleb, we cant lose Flamini, if we lost Flamini we cant lose Hleb, but sad thing is we lost both, which actually effected our play deeply this season, that why this season Arsenal are poorer compare to last season Arsenal, though we only lose 2 players

Hahaha, the Keown, Viera, and all those old boys of the old Arsenal days eh? hahaha. Man, in those days, when Arsenal meet MU, sure everybody will say "Wow, u think who will fight in tonight match and got ppl get red card or not ho?"

Seriously, Chelsea defense not like what they use to be, plus Cech not as good as he use to be also, or maybe MU just too good today, or maybe both also, hahahaha

I dont know why, as long Drogba is playing, Anelka never seem that good too

All in all, simple to put it, I dont know why Arsenal getting most of the attention, hahaha, maybe those ppl is either secretly in love with Arsenal or they are secretly jealous of Arsenal, hahaha.

Anyway, on the Denilson article, I agree that Denilson is good, but I will never see him as a Paddy, Gilberto or even Petit sort of player, or even a flamini, he is more like a Fabregas player, more attacking than defensive actually.

The only thing that I dont like in getting him much, is that later he just use Arsenal as a jumping stone for him to go to Barca, cause you know lo, we do have a lot of past businesses with barca, and Barca just love our players sometime