QUOTE(underminer @ Jan 3 2009, 07:00 PM)
The hardest task I have in maintaining this is the distribution of points to the teams with its various changes being performed and the never-ending team smurfers out there. In this case the rankings are "team based" where in which case of a split happening, the team that has most of its former members will take up the team's position with a new name in the rankings. To maintain it effectively, will need teams which experienced changes and stuffs to pm me directly so I can reflect your team's status directly in the points.
Good job, underminer! Going "team based" is a good decision but since you defined it as " the team that has most of its former members will take up the team's position with a new name in the rankings", how about teams that have totally new members?
Jan 3 2009, 08:28 PM
Quote
0.0233sec
0.65
6 queries
GZIP Disabled