The Distribution must be at least as user friendly as Vista (which is not so user friendly
The Best Desktop Linux 64 Bit, The most user friendly
The Best Desktop Linux 64 Bit, The most user friendly
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 01:57 PM, updated 16y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
What is the best Desktop Linux 64 Bit in your opinion in term of user friendly? Please give your reason.
The Distribution must be at least as user friendly as Vista (which is not so user friendly |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 02:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Thanks for your comment bro. I open it because it just want to be specific with this question and this question only.
As for KDE, I find that its quite a bit different form windows (KDE 4). As for Ubuntu 8.10, I don't seems to find it user friendly enough. Especially for a total stranger to Linux like most of the people. Actually I want Linux distribution that is simple so that even my dad know who handle it. Heard PCLinuxOS is user friendly but it got no 64 bit version. Any thought? |
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 04:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 07:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 09:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(old_calculator @ Dec 30 2008, 10:17 PM) im not really into linux and i just use it for >2 hrs. What i like abt it coz its very very user friendly. all the codecs are installed and you also can play music with only just hover your mouse to the file. for the GUI i think its okay I also heard that it has one of the easiest GUI. Still waiting for the latest 64 bit version though coz the recently released was 32 bit version. just my opinion How about hardware compatibility? Any thought? |
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 01:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Anyone have any thought?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(xordMeztGeR @ Jan 1 2009, 02:38 PM) well, for the one who basically grow up with windows, ubuntu maybe is not user friendly. but for my dad, who never touch a computer before, the ubuntu is good for him. btw, why you need a 64 bit OS? 32 bit is good enough actually, and it can run perfectly on 64 bit processor Good question. Its because I want to use all of my 4GB RAM and in turn would make it easier for me to run virtual machine and install Windows in it. In short I want to move to Linux but that Linux must be Windows Like so that the learning curve is not that high. I will only use Windows when its absolutely necessary.Added on January 1, 2009, 9:13 pm QUOTE(ongte @ Jan 1 2009, 05:09 PM) OpenSuse & Mandriva are the only distros that worked well for me in 64bit. All others had more limitations & stuff missing. I believe Mandriva is not 64 bit. But is it easy to use?If you insist on 64bit, you WILL have to live with some limitations. How much depends on what you need. As for OpenSUSE, I believe I have briefly tried the latest one but it can't seem to detect my Broadcom wireless but Ubuntu can do it with no issue. Its just Ubuntu is a bit hard to use for me. This post has been edited by Spade: Jan 1 2009, 09:13 PM |
|
|
Jan 2 2009, 12:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ongte @ Jan 1 2009, 10:19 PM) *but that Linux must be Windows Like* I have to comment on this point. Linux != Windows. The reason it's good is because it's different from Windows. Almost every linux distro has got both 32bit & 64bit editions. There are 64bit versions of Ubuntu, Mandriva & OpenSUSE. They are usually labeled like i386 and x86_64. Have you tried out the latest OpenSUSE 11.1, it's a pretty good release. Mandriva is pretty good as a general purpose desktop. I find it friendlier than Ubuntu, but you have to decide what suits you. I think I need to clear some things up to avoid confusion. What I meant it that sentence is that the GUI is Windows-Like. So that you will feel more at home. I have tried a few of the well-known 64 bit Desktop Linux but have yet to found the one that I like. I don't mine even if I have to pay for it as long as its easy to use. All I want is an alternative to MS Windows. Even after I have found a suitable and easy to use desktop Linux, I will still use my Windows albeit in a form of virtual machine running on a Linux system. As I mentioned in my previous post, I have briefly tried openSUSE 11.1 and it looks very good. But the main let down is that it can't detect my Broadcom WiFi thus I will need to be some kind of geek to make it run which not what I wanted since I don't have time to waste. This post has been edited by Spade: Jan 2 2009, 12:07 AM |
|
|
Jan 2 2009, 12:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ongte @ Jan 2 2009, 12:38 AM) I understand. There are several distros that try to look like Windows, such as Xandros & Linspire. But the similarity is superficial & often leads to more confusion once u delve in a little deeper, because no matter how Windows like they try to make it on the surface, the underlying structure is still completely different. That's why I can't recommend them. But if u wanna try them out, then by all means. I just don't like the command prompt thingy when all you need is just to install a software. Any idea in the least use of command prompt version? Actually at first I will not spend that much time on Linux since I intend to run Windows on a virtual Machine (Virtual Box or something) for Linux. So my first target it to get a Linux that can be easily setup to work with my computer. Once it done I can slowly climb the learning curve.In the current state of affairs, it's not possible to completely avoid the geeky stuff if you intend to use Linux. At some point or other, you will need to learn it. I recommend you try out as many distros as possible before u settle on a choice. As least you should try all the other big ones like: Fedora Mandriva Mepis Mint Kubuntu - Since u didn't like gnome. Maybe u'll like the KDE version. |
|
|
Jan 2 2009, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(zaidi @ Jan 2 2009, 02:22 AM) what do your dad use comp for? maybe a full featured linux is not that suitable if he just used for web browsing and type letters. He use it for any other normal Windows use their comp. I don't mind if a Linux distribution have a full feature as long as its basic/normal features (that most of Windows users want) are user-friendly enough.This post has been edited by Spade: Jan 2 2009, 10:49 AM |
|
|
Jan 2 2009, 01:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Cannonfodder @ Jan 2 2009, 10:55 AM) You don't find that something like Ubuntu covers most of what an average user would need? Web browser, office suite, and some knick knacks? Ubuntu 8.10 did not detect my sound and with Ubuntu can't really surfing the net properly out-of-the-box since it wont allow layman to install plugins required when you surf to the site like lowyat.net and all other since they strictly allow 100% free software.User-friendly, no? DIfferent from Windows, but no more so than MacOS. |
|
|
Jan 2 2009, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(yuchankit @ Jan 2 2009, 02:48 PM) Since you can't detect the sound,SOLVE IT. Of course I will run my Windows Vista Ultimate on Linux using the Virtual Box.I do think you install linux to learn linux.So,it's great chance to learn linux. You can't just switch to other distro,because your sound is not working,network is not working etc without making attempt to solve them in your present distro. Ubuntu,Mint,and PC Linux OS is considered very user-friendly distro.If you really want Windows-like GUI,go for Windows. And,what's your definition of USER-FRIENDLY?Slackware is user-friendly distro to me. Some Linux fail to detect my Broadcom Wireless (only the broadcom) while others fail to my sound (only sound). So far I haven't found one that can detect both Broadcom wireless AND sound. As for learning. Yes I do want to learn but I want to first setup the Linux machine up and running and install my Vista on it using Virtual Box so that I can use it for my daily routine and do my work. After my basic necessity has been fulfiled ONLY THEN I will slowly learn the Linux and eventually will STOP using Vista at some point (I hope). You can suggest me any Linux even the commercial one coz I don't mind paying. All I want is just an alternative to MS Operating System. Added on January 2, 2009, 8:59 pm QUOTE(beyond_99 @ Jan 2 2009, 03:55 PM) QUOTE(Cannonfodder @ Jan 2 2009, 02:57 PM) Sorry to hear that. Yeah, my desktop running fine too but my notebooks isn't. The thing is I want to get rid of my desktop and just start using notebook 100%. That is why now I have 2 notebook where one is exclusively for torrent + encoding job.I was actually impressed with how everything worked OOTB for me. My WiFi, Nvidia card, sound (mine is onboard tho), it even identified my monitor which Windows always listed as a generic PnP. Everything worked on first boot. Same thing with my Toshiba laptop, all my components work: Wifi, bluetooth, video. I still am amazed at the level of hardware support. What plug-ins? Like Flash Player? Why not? I got mine installed and I have to be very honest and say I know nothing about Linux. If you're any more layman than me, you'll have to dig a hole to see the sky. You running from Live CD or an install? I'm downloading other distros like Mandriva, Fedora and OpenSuse to test but I'm happy enough with Ubuntu now. This post has been edited by Spade: Jan 2 2009, 09:00 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2009, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(yuchankit @ Jan 3 2009, 12:44 AM) You can go to distrowatch.com to see distributions you want.You can also go to http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/li...5/?daysprune=30 to seek any recommendation for the type of distro you want. As far as I know those 3 Linux distribution hasn't been updated to new Kernel for years. New Kernel usually means better hardware support especially a new hardware.First,what sound card you have? What type of chipset is your Broadcom?I'm not too familiar with wireless thingy.I leave it to other forummer. For Linux,you will really have to be very CAREFUL when you purchase your hardware,or laptop because some of them just incompatible with Unix/Linux system. Some problems are related to kernel,not necessarily the distros. BTW,Isn't setting up a perfect running Linux system is a part of learning linux? If you still want recommendations,you can try Linspire/Freespire or Xandros. If you really want to learn linux/Unix the hard way,Debian,Slackware,*Solaris and *BSDs may be suitable for you. As for learning yes, setting up a perfect running Linux is part of the learning but it should be simple. At least as simple as setting up a Windows. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2009, 12:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(nlinley @ Jan 5 2009, 08:27 AM) I have been playing around with opensuse 10.3 64bit. I don't know if it is the most user friendly (probably ubuntu is a better bet for that). I have noticed some of the software that comes with opensuse doesn't work as it was distributed, occasionally its hard to add software, java plugin for web was not set up to work properly in the distro. Otherwise it has been pretty stable and fast. Its because the one that you tried is 100% OSS version. You should try the one with proprietary software then you can do many thing like play movies, mp3 and surfing internet with java function and other plugins. But still, my quest is to find the most user friendly Linux. |
|
|
Jan 11 2009, 07:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Any other suggestion gentlemen?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2009, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Now waiting for Linux Mint 7 64Bit edition.
|
|
|
Feb 11 2010, 02:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Mint 8 seems nice. Anyone have any thought on it?
|
|
|
Jun 7 2010, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,495 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur |
anyone currently using the latest Linux Mint? Please share info.
|
| Change to: | 0.0179sec
0.63
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 04:27 PM |