Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Downtime Undersea sub-cables have just broken..., Is the internet going down?

views
     
Rybberduck
post Jan 6 2009, 07:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Internet services in Qatar have been restored to full capacity following damage caused to three undersea cables last month, telecommunications operator Qatar Telecom (Qtel) announced on Monday.

In a report on the issue, the provider said safety measures it introduced in 2008 helped ensure disruption from the breach was kept to a minimum.

Internet services were disrupted on December 19 when damage was caused to three undersea cables located in the Mediterranean between Sicily and Tunisia, which are estimated to carry 75 percent of traffic between the Middle East, Europe and America.
Story continues below ↓
advertisement

But loss of capacity in Qatar was kept below 47 percent, Qtel said, because its network of alternative transmission routes and back-up cables ensured that Qatar remained connected. It said Qtel’s built-in safety margin of 20 percent spare capacity ensured the traffic impact overall was less than 27 percent.

During 2008 Qtel said it positioned itself so that there was an even split between data sent via Western-running cables, such as the affected cables in the Mediterranean, and via Eastern-running cables, through Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan.

The firm said this meant it was able to begin routing all data via the Eastern-running cables within six hours of the first break being reported.

In addition, Qtel maintained regular contact with the team
responsible for the cable ship charged with repairing the breach.

The first cable, Sea Me We 4, which carries a significant volume of data for Qatar, was repaired by France Télécom on December 25, restoring 70 percent of potential capacity to Qatar. The cable broke again in a different location on the same day, offshore from Alexandria, Egypt, and the team had to travel to repair the new break.

The second cable, FLAG, was fixed on December 31, restoring 81 percent of capacity to Qatar, while the second breach on Sea Me We 4 was repaired on January 4, restoring Qatar to 100 percent internet capacity.

The third and final cable, Sea Me We 3, was reported as being repaired on Monday, although this cable does not carry any data for Qatar.
Rybberduck
post Jan 7 2009, 07:12 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



IP: 65.39.166.199
Date/Time: 01/07/2009 7:10:09 PM

1 * * * [-]
2 67 ms 66 ms * [219.93.218.177]
3 65 ms 64 ms 65 ms [219.93.217.165]
4 65 ms 66 ms 65 ms [58.27.103.218]
5 * * * [-]
6 70 ms 70 ms 113 ms [202.188.126.132]
7 72 ms 70 ms 71 ms [58.27.103.97]
8 72 ms 70 ms 71 ms [58.27.103.121]
9 360 ms 358 ms 360 ms [58.27.106.206]
10 271 ms 272 ms 292 ms Equinix-SJO.Peer1.net [206.223.116.30]
11 288 ms 288 ms 351 ms 10ge.ten1-1.sj-mkp2-dis-1.peer1.net [216.187.89.101]
12 279 ms 282 ms 280 ms 10ge-ten1-3.la-600w-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.88.130]
13 274 ms 274 ms 274 ms 10ge.ten1-1.la-600w-cor-2.peer1.net [216.187.88.146]
14 317 ms 317 ms 316 ms 10ge-ten1-2.dal-eqx-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.124.122]
15 331 ms 330 ms 333 ms 10ge-ten1-1.dal-eqx-cor-2.peer1.net [216.187.124.134]
16 334 ms 330 ms 331 ms 10ge-ten2-1.atl-telx-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.124.118]
17 351 ms 352 ms 353 ms 10ge-ten1-1.atl-101mar-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.120.226]
18 349 ms 349 ms 349 ms 10ge.xe-1-0-0.wdc-eqx-dis-1.peer1.net [216.187.115.37]
19 351 ms 351 ms 349 ms 10ge.ten1-2.wdc-sp2-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.115.234]
20 349 ms 350 ms 349 ms 10ge.ten1-1.wdc-sp2-cor-2.peer1.net [216.187.116.254]
21 448 ms 460 ms 454 ms 10ge.xe-2-0-0.nyc-telx-dis-1.peer1.net [216.187.115.221]
22 454 ms 454 ms 469 ms oc192.xe-1-0-0.mtl-bvh-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.115.53]
23 362 ms 362 ms 364 ms oc48-po6-0.mtl-bvh-dis-1.peer1.net [216.187.115.74]
24 365 ms 363 ms 363 ms [216.187.115.82]
25 * * * [-]
26 * * * [-]
27 * * * [-]
28 * * * [-]
29 * * * [-]

Destination not reached in 35 hops
Rybberduck
post Jan 7 2009, 10:37 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
www.facebook.com >>> ping 677ms

Rybberduck
post Jan 8 2009, 06:41 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
At my place (Johor) it getting each day worst.
My Ip : 60.50.228

Ping to : www.yahoo.de 217.146.186.51 745ms

soon it will faster to write a post mail then e-mail ......
Rybberduck
post Jan 9 2009, 05:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Target Name: rc1.vip.ird.yahoo.com
IP: 217.146.186.221
Date/Time: 01/09/2009 5:29:59 PM

1 * [-]
2 * [-]
3 181 ms [219.93.217.165]
4 203 ms [58.27.103.218]
5 252 ms [203.106.253.225]
6 234 ms [210.187.129.131]
7 204 ms [58.27.103.101]
8 225 ms [58.27.103.125]
9 443 ms [203.106.86.86]
10 557 ms ge-1-1-0.pat1.the.yahoo.com [195.66.224.129]
11 553 ms so-0-1-0.msr1.ird.yahoo.com [217.12.0.251]
12 550 ms gi-1-7.bas-a2.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.184.159]
13 537 ms rc1.vip.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.186.221]

Ping statistics for rc1.vip.ird.yahoo.com
Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 1, Lost = 0 (0.0%)
Round Trip Times: Minimum = 537ms, Maximum = 537ms, Average = 537ms

My Ip is 60.50


I dont think this guy's from TM need to do anything , just give the seacabel company a call to reroute.......

Anyone from Singapore reading this ? Same problem there with servers from Europe and some from US ?



sleep.gif <<<< best what you can do



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0259sec    0.57    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 03:35 AM