***The LYN Official Islam Thread***, Let Us Unite! 
Jan 22 2009, 11:44 AM
QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Dec 17 2008, 12:07 PM)
seingat aku la...
pertama bersihkan kawasan-kawasan yang kotor dulu...
kemudian, ambil wuduk. lepas tu mandi dengan niat nak membersihkan hadas besar.
asal tangan tak kena kemaluanz, cukuplah, wuduk terjaga, mandi hadas pun lepas. 2 in 1... selepas tu boleh la sembahyang ke apa...
Aku musykil pasal satu benda nih, penah dgr/bca somewhere x pyh wudhu'..... psl hadas besar, wudhu' utk hadas kecil jerk...pertama bersihkan kawasan-kawasan yang kotor dulu...
kemudian, ambil wuduk. lepas tu mandi dengan niat nak membersihkan hadas besar.
asal tangan tak kena kemaluanz, cukuplah, wuduk terjaga, mandi hadas pun lepas. 2 in 1... selepas tu boleh la sembahyang ke apa...
QUOTE(St0rmFury @ Dec 17 2008, 09:05 PM)
I want to ask, why are the devout Muslims not doing more to topple the corrupt and definitely un-Islamic UMNO?
Real Muslim are very small in numbers nowadays...a lot of them doesn't really/fully practice islamic teachings...capitalist/hedonist/materialistic... to much duniawi-oriented (sorry, dunno the right word in english) QUOTE(j45on @ Dec 17 2008, 11:43 PM)
As a non-Muslim, I think the problem the religion is facing today lies in those older generation who preached it. As most ethnicity show, the older generation usually finds it hard to accept the newer generation's way of applying things.
No doubt the newer generations is inexperience, leaders of the newer generations is not simply chosen as well.
Anyway, what I am saying is, protectionism of the religion is bad. A good example would be current Rule of law forbidding Muslims to switch religion. If it's good, why made it a crime?
Rule of economics says, rational people prefers that more is better. I am from the economics background, so I will be using a lot of 'free economy' analogy in my post.
Sorry if I may have caused any dishearten among the readers. For some court, criminals are guilty until found innocent, for me, it's disapproved until proven, given the first-hand evidence showing around me.
Allah made it crime in Islam to switch to another religion for a reason. Islam is not meant to be taken lightly...It's rules and laws are not created by mere human, but Almighty Allah, the creator of all life form and universe. Since Islam is the only religion that Allah recognize as true and just, why bother changing religion? What you can see around you nowadays is that they didn't really practice Islamic teaching to the fullestNo doubt the newer generations is inexperience, leaders of the newer generations is not simply chosen as well.
Anyway, what I am saying is, protectionism of the religion is bad. A good example would be current Rule of law forbidding Muslims to switch religion. If it's good, why made it a crime?
Rule of economics says, rational people prefers that more is better. I am from the economics background, so I will be using a lot of 'free economy' analogy in my post.
Sorry if I may have caused any dishearten among the readers. For some court, criminals are guilty until found innocent, for me, it's disapproved until proven, given the first-hand evidence showing around me.
This post has been edited by aBg_rOnGak: Jan 22 2009, 11:59 AM
Quote
0.0137sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled