Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Super Noobs Help! [Thread V3], Post Your ULTRA Simple Questions Here

views
     
Clavicus
post Dec 18 2008, 11:48 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Question: Are bad clusters on a new hard drive something to worry about?
Clavicus
post Dec 19 2008, 06:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(xelnamikaze @ Dec 18 2008, 11:49 PM)
Answer:
Using CHKDSK to Fix Your Hard Drive Issues

Step 1 : Understand your problem. In a Windows-based file system, a cluster is a block of storage space that is not listed as free, but is not assigned to any file, either. In other words, the file system has marked the cluster to not be overwritten, but it doesn't know why. This does not necessarily indicate any problems with the hard drive itself. Usually, lost or bad clusters are the result of improper program terminations, like those due to power loss or shutting off a computer without closing the applications first.

Step 2 : Open a command prompt or DOS prompt. Depending on which version of Windows you are using, there are multiple ways to run the CHKDSK utility. The method that works across most versions is to run it via the command line.

Step 3 : Type "chkdsk /r" in your command prompt window. This tells the computer to run the CHKDSK utility and to repair any errors it finds. Your may need to reboot your computer to run the chkdsk utility.

Step 4 : Wait for the utility to finish. Unless you begin seeing errors on the screen right away, it is probably in your best interest to go do something else while your computer checks the drive. The process can take hours, so there is not need to sit and stare at the screen.

Step 5 : Reboot. After the utility has finished, reboot your system to start the operating system normally. Your lost clusters will be saved as files named with the convention: file####.chkThe data in such files is usually worthless. However, you may be able to analyze the files and recover some data if it is critical.

^^
*
Actually, i was running CHKDSK when i got messages about bad clusters popping up during stage 4. Nevertheless, thanks for the detailed reply. Was actually kinda worried as i had my rig crash on me twice yesterday. Once was IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL with smth regarding nv4 and the second time its KERNEL_INPAGE_DATA_ERROR. Googled the errors and it pointed me towards either the RAM or the hard disk failing. I put software issues aside as problems occured the moment i changed my hard disk to the current one. Ran memtest for an hour or so, came up clean, so i decided it was the hard disk.

Should i just RMA the drive? It still under the 7-day 1-to-1 policy.
Clavicus
post Dec 19 2008, 05:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(xelnamikaze @ Dec 19 2008, 11:58 AM)
you should go and change your HDD using 1-to-1 with the place you bought it.
*
Indeed, i have done so today. Sent it to their tech department, even they said that the drive was problematic after 10 mins of checking. Praying hard that this one doesnt suffer the same fate. biggrin.gif Thanks alot for the advice.
Clavicus
post Dec 27 2008, 12:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Anyone knows the price of a VIA Nano and where i can get one?
Clavicus
post Dec 27 2008, 07:49 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Aww, nuts. The Nano is really interesting lar. With PCI-E and better power consumption. Atoms are all over the place tho. There's not a single distro that brings VIA products in?
Clavicus
post Dec 27 2008, 12:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(lucifah @ Dec 27 2008, 12:06 PM)
if you have a huge wad of cash, pm sniperontheroof. he's in taiwan and can get access to OEM via proc

btw, VIA sucks big time. stupid underpowered processor. dunno why you still want it even though there are many reviews against it
correction: the reso should be 1680x1050

your 3870 should be able to support high setting for NFS, but not necessarily in that high native resolution

NFS is not a high end game. crysis is
*
Orly? Haven't really read up on VIA procs, only comparisions to Atom. Guess they just highlighted its pros against the Atom, omitting its flaws. Thanks for the heads-up. Guess i'll stick with my X2 for torrenting for now.
Clavicus
post Dec 28 2008, 10:38 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Help! How do i use widescreen resolutions in Vista with my integrated GPU? I'm using a nF630i / 7050 on an Asus M2N68-AM. I've installed the drivers that came with the board, plus 17x.xx for Vista. This worked for me when i was on XP, but when it came to Vista, no luck. It only provides 4:3 resolutions.

Tried googling, but so far, no luck.
Clavicus
post Dec 28 2008, 11:48 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Tried, but NvCP is utterly messed up. Custom resolutions can work, but it wont stick. The checkbox below the custom resolutions, the key to applying custom resos, keeps unchecking itself. Score one for Nvidia drivers.
Clavicus
post Mar 6 2009, 09:16 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
WTA, does 945G that comes with Atom support widescreen for both XP and Vista?
Clavicus
post May 17 2009, 09:03 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
If you're on a tight budget, no point spending extra on a fancy casing la. A PowerLogic or CM basic casing. My friend has a C2D and 8800GT stock in a PowerLogic casing, and he hasn't encountered any heat issues. Might not be the healthiest environment for the PC, but it works.

WTA, does the router affect transfer speeds amongst PCs? I'm using a home network and transfer speeds were around 1.5-2 mbps (according to Vista file transfer) from a torrent PC to a notebook wirelessly. Does WAN (connections to the Internet) affect local transfer speeds? Does my PC need any extra hardware to transfer files faster?
Clavicus
post May 17 2009, 08:08 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(danny_sp15 @ May 17 2009, 12:20 PM)
amd or intel, whichever one is fine. a rig with the purpose of torrenting and gaming. budget about rm1800 including lcd panel. i already suggested acer x193hq to him cos im using the lcd and so far it's quite good, pretty cheap too. the rig only need mobo, proc, 2gb ram, gc, dvd. no soundcard needed. i dont think i'll be having prob with the specs. hmm, i thought of the lanparty bag as well and suggested that to him too, but we'll consider that as plan B cos the rig is still pretty heavy and big. maybe a mini-tower would do. i'll try and ask him. thanks bro! icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Google CM Elite 360. Very basic, and the size is pretty decent.
Clavicus
post May 18 2009, 02:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Doesn't seem too bad in this link.

http://www.motherboards.org/imageview.html...e/1890_p6_6.jpg

PSU is modular i think. Anyway, bumping my question.


WTA, does the router affect transfer speeds amongst PCs? I'm using a home network and transfer speeds were around 1.5-2 mbps (according to Vista file transfer) from a torrent PC to a notebook wirelessly. Does WAN (connections to the Internet) affect local transfer speeds? Does my PC need any extra hardware to transfer files faster?
Clavicus
post May 19 2009, 02:28 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
I was talking about file transfer speeds between two computers connected to a router via Ethernet cables. Sorry for the mess up.
Clavicus
post May 19 2009, 06:05 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Er, no idea. How do i check? The box is no longer with me. This is the router i'm using.

http://www.trendnet.com/products/proddetai...W-432BRP&cat=82

http://www.cnet.com.au/trendnet-tew-432brp-240091623.htm

I assume its 100 mbps?

This post has been edited by Clavicus: May 19 2009, 06:07 PM
Clavicus
post May 19 2009, 06:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
biggrin.gif thankew. Its 100 mbps then. So if i need higher LAN transfer speed, i should get a better router + network card?
Clavicus
post May 19 2009, 07:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
765 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Roger that. How much increase in speed should I be seeing?

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0257sec    0.23    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:01 AM