if thats the case its easy wud

definite and then give obvious examples to proof and another to defend
=winrar oledi

come i spoon fed u moarr

defamation = an act to defame an individual, group, and organisation with malicious intent to paint a negative image usually with untrue/twisted facts

defamation got 2 types
slander and libel

slander is in verbal form think of it as speech
libel as in written think of it as poison pen

give examples for each of the above

and give more examples of defense e.g.

truth
opinion
privilege e.g. our mps got privelege against such law suit in dewan rakyat
consent
edit not negligence shuld be no knowledge
made in good faith



heheheh
its necesary to have such laws in order to fight terrorism
but sadly
it has been misused as of late
so either we change our leader or abolish the act at the risk of less terrorism control

This post has been edited by ^Hobbes^: Dec 2 2008, 02:49 PM

oh and u cant sue some one for defamation if there isnt any third party involve
for example person A n B in a room with no other ppl
person A says something to tarnish B's reputation
B kenot sue A for defamation

cuz his reputation tarnish against who?
lulz
and in that case A argues its his opinion and no damage done to his reputation since nobody else in the room

have a naise lunch
its during the chin peng era communist era
lulz

no its still relevant
cuz we have terrorism naoo

but its been misused

anyway
have a naise lunch

and if ur not in a position to do damage u kenot be sued for defamation too
for example a patient from tanjung rambutan
u wont be able to sue him tho
cuz his reputation in the society = olang gila and tok crap
so wudever he says wont do enuff damage to your reputation

like me everyone in the forum knows i am lame and tok crap

if some one decides to sue me most likely i can escape with it
as my reputation is incapable of defamation

each time i see ur avatar
i got feel wana fap

u 2 got jalan?
i very sad and jeles

u sked ppl ?
lulz

beggar included
unless u can get prima facie evidence that the beggar is a datuk or a normal person
lulz

---

Added on December 2, 2008, 3:07 pmveli sad
u dun allow me to fap
u communist


This post has been edited by ^Hobbes^: Dec 2 2008, 03:07 PM

kenot
unles u got prima facie that the begger is indeed a datuk indisguise
else it'll be thrown out of court
lulz

np have a nice sleep

whai u need to ask?

i retired from those scenes for a few years

ask the ladies if they want to or not
hehehe
i'm definitely out

wb

kiki ler?

oh haiiiiiii

some one told me before i dunno how true

gurls love dominant guys that knows how to control the situation

neither am i

zehhhhhh zomato iz heeree