Nov 26 2008, 02:26 PM
QUOTE(Beast-Slayer @ Nov 26 2008, 01:01 PM)
that's why i propose for cod4 committee to have some sort of squad ranking.. not clan.. easy to say but it's not imposibble to be done.. give point for team who join/reach 2nd round/3rd round/q-finals/s-finals and finalist.. add up their score throughout the whole tourney.. but points must differ based on tourney status.. like grandslam (tennis). So that later one we will have a long list of squads.. this surely will fire up those clan below to move up their ranks.. just my 2 cents.
p.s= 1st step has been taken by death (create a committee), hey u guys should register legally through ROS so that we can operate legally (sponsorship and so on).
All of the above,p.s= 1st step has been taken by death (create a committee), hey u guys should register legally through ROS so that we can operate legally (sponsorship and so on).
Already in planning.
Also in planning, promod tournies (online, malaysian based)
what i really (from experience la..) promod is really suitable for is online play. I will attempt to talk to UC pro about supporting this endevour.
Pam402 however matches that now, as it adds promod's performance settings. But PAM402 will be left for offline play.
As for ranking systems, i will come up with a plan for seeding. Anything before the league completes is just a plain waste. What we can see now is not enough to justify who should or should not be in aside from taking out the top 3, which the organizers are already doing.
Also, if we dont keep a standardized and linked database (Which is under construction), its hard for new organizers to create this ban, as it would be hard to remember the top 3 from each compy (as in players) to ban for their tourney.
Organizers should be firm in what they believe is fair, giving in to pressure from players that are not your target audience will only make your tourney look bad. Keep it as simple as possible for yourself. If im not mistaken, you only banned teams that were top 3, so its really not their fault if other non-top 3 teams want to play. Perhaps you can be more specific about what teams should/should not be banned.
Pros vs noobs : Experience wise, if you've been around for 6 months or so, you'd be considered a vet. Maybe not a pro, but a vet will still overpower a newbie in terms of experience, tactics and perhaps the inner workings of COD4.
But then, if you totally ban all old teams from playing, who are they going to learn from? Its a give or take, hope the organizers take this into consideration.
Added on November 26, 2008, 2:29 pm
QUOTE(Strayfah @ Nov 26 2008, 01:09 PM)
Quote
AIM: Boost the number of players for Call of Duty 4 community. Give a chance for the freshie to know more about Call of Duty 4, and build their own clan.
Honest, I think only 60% of the teams signed up are considered freshies.
Other than that, I don't think the rest are. But if you guys still want to join then just join. No offense but seriously, calling yourselves noobs so you guys can join this tournament is just plain pathetic.
60% is still a good number.. lets just hope the non-noobs dont send them home so hard they actually quit.AIM: Boost the number of players for Call of Duty 4 community. Give a chance for the freshie to know more about Call of Duty 4, and build their own clan.
Honest, I think only 60% of the teams signed up are considered freshies.
Other than that, I don't think the rest are. But if you guys still want to join then just join. No offense but seriously, calling yourselves noobs so you guys can join this tournament is just plain pathetic.
This post has been edited by crashtec: Nov 26 2008, 02:29 PM
Quote
Interested in joining the marshall team? 
0.0216sec
0.82
7 queries
GZIP Disabled