QUOTE(jwrx @ Jan 19 2009, 11:00 PM)
agreed about rental yeilds, positive cash flow is more important then % yield. with 20-25% down, 30 year tenure, you can get positive cashflow from Nadia, not much, in the range of 200-500, but still positive.
jwrx,
At 90% financing, will the Nadia condo still yields u positive cashflow? Else u could get better COCR elsewhere, no?
Actually went to see DPC about a year ago, liked/loved the place and the concept, even checked Nadia, but I walked away due to :
1. Rental yields is low(I use this and COCR as a basic indicator to see if an investment is a viable one, as "positive cashflow" is rather easily tweaked), plus tenant liquidity was an issue back then. No sure how much things have changed in 1 year, perhaps u could enlighthen us.
2. The whole DPC was relatively empty....... and I came away thinking ppl who bought into DPC are mainly speculators. And developments where the huge majority of the purchasers are speculators dont often ends well, unless u have a big pile of reserves to hold the property for a few years. Think this Nadia subsale upon VP was selling at developers price, and it took more than 1 year before price levels actually took off to a respectable levels.
Anyway, good luck in your hunt

Added on January 20, 2009, 1:28 amQUOTE(Phoeni_142 @ Jan 19 2009, 10:37 PM)
cash flow is the most important metric to me - not yield. Just my own personal view - too much emphasis given on yield sometimes, and it's over-rated. So what if the unit yields 13%? That metric only holds water if u buy 100% cash.
Mate,
Cash-flow numbers could be "tweaked" as well . Personally would use COCR as the best indicator evaluate any investment opportunity.
This post has been edited by Pai: Jan 20 2009, 01:28 AM