i think i want it to be fiction... we don't have many futuristic series of COD, i know of some handguns that can be turned and has cameras...

ACtivision = Bodo IMHO here.
They still have that moronic head of ignoring community development. GL HF to them in a few years time.

Huh?

1. CoD franchise had never once been based on "fact" other than the setting of the game and the weapons.
2. CoD4 is ALREADY a futuristic series, I think the game setting is around the year 2010-2012.

LOL...i should say COD6:Star Wars

Replace the knives with light sabers!!!!! FFFFFFFFFFFFFF

I hate sci-fi games. Really.

Guided bullets
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5788178/fulltext.html
who needs to aim now eh?

how about bullet that u can control??
like homing missle?

---

Added on November 3, 2008, 12:22 amyeah.COD have too much historical series...COD4 is the only modern one...
to bad....now brothers in arms has win COd1,2,3....

This post has been edited by AlexLee277: Nov 3 2008, 12:22 AM

Activision = act like no vision

haha XD

watch Future Weapons on Discovery channel to get free previews of Cod6:Future Warfare

The time frame of the game is set around the late 1980's to 1990's. The word Soviet Union says everything. But then again, It is fictional.

Although the fact that if the Soviet Union was still in power till 2010AD, we would have seen a very different world. The arms race would never have ended.

Perhaps even WWIII / EndWar.

Still remember the All Ghillied Up mission? The setting dates back "15 years ago", considering the fact that Chernobyl nuclear accident happened on April 1986 (which was why more than 50,000 citizens fled and abandoned that place) and there's pockets of radiation all over the place, I put my bet that the game setting is set during the early 21st century.

This post has been edited by Luftwacko: Nov 3 2008, 02:46 AM

yep, i prefer bullet physics.

btw for cod series, it depends on who's developing them. i would prefer infinity ward. both cod2 and cod4 were done by IW, and they say all even numbered version of cod will be developed by IW, i think IW really did a good job.

So... The game's timeframe is around 2001 then. Overestimated and Underestimated lol.

The CoD series has not much room then. I think CoD6 would really be the last.

IW can't do it forever. CoD was always been a shoot'em up in its Singleplayer perspective and a fast paced team based shooter in Multiplayer.

IW should just move on to something better. If they can't, Activision would have to expect the worst then.

This post has been edited by t3quila: Nov 3 2008, 04:26 AM

I'm kind of into the Chernobyl incident. S.T.A.L.K.E.R and CoD4: Modern Warfare used that incident as the background. I can provide a few of pictures.

Btw, from what I see, Chernobyl incident happened at 26th of April 1986. Price then has a flashback of his mission to eliminate Zakhaev in Prypiat, Ukraine, 15 years ago. In the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster and the collapse of the Soviet Union. History of the Soviet Union only last for 6 years from 1985 till 1991. So that incident where Price and McMillan should be between 1995 till 2003.

Hmmm.... remember the during the loading screen of All Ghillied Up mission? Cpt Price used to quote this:



Well, I'm kindda puzzled with this... The former Soviet Union collapsed on Christmas day of 1991. So I was wondering... is it a decade after the chernobyl iccident or the collapse of USSR? If it's the Chernobyl nuclear incident, then the game setting should be 2011, collapse of USSR, 2016.

Are you like.. 1986 + 1 decade and + 15 year?

Yup

I don't think that's the correct one. Try to figure why I say is wrong.

omg u peeps lol actually i dun care less bout wad happens in game and in reality LOLX~

only a few bunch of peeps liken u guyz really erm... studied the gameplay and history LOL

for me i just enjoy the game + graphics + fragging ^^
the intense action fast pace game where bla bla bla bla bla~~

cut it short play for fun ^^