Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
vinothen
post Jan 19 2009, 01:35 PM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



samsung not bad...if got more cash get pioneer....lol


Added on January 19, 2009, 1:44 pmDell S2409W Black 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor

Collapse All Sections
Description: S2409W Black 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor
Manufacturer: Dell
Lowest Price: According to the people RM700
User Reviews:
(4.67 / 5.00)
(Read 3 Reviews)
Rebates: (None)
Quick Glance
Screen Size: 24 in
Included Interfaces: Audio - Line In,
Audio - Line Out,
Video - 15 pin High-Density D-shell (VGA),
Video - 24 pin DVI-D,
Video - HDMI
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Response Time: 5 ms
Energy Star: Yes
Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
Display Panel
Brightness: 300 cd/m2
Pitch: 0.276 mm
Horizontal Viewing Angle: 160 degrees
Vertical Viewing Angle: 170 degrees
Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
Display Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
Viewable Size: 24 in
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Max Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Response Time: 5 ms
Diagonal Size: 24 in
Interface
Interface Connection: Audio - Line In,
Audio - Line Out,
Video - 15 pin High-Density D-shell (VGA),
Video - 24 pin DVI-D,
Video - HDMI
Other Features
Energy Star Compliant: Yes
Included Devices: Monitor Stand
General Features: HDCP,
Wallmount
Monitor Color: Black
Dimensions
Weight: 17.83 lbs
Depth: 8.76 in
Width: 22.72 in
Height: 16.39 in
Warranty
Warranty Information: 1 Year Limited Warranty
More Info
URL: Manufacturer Link

This post has been edited by vinothen: Jan 19 2009, 01:46 PM
vinothen
post Feb 7 2009, 01:30 PM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



DELL S2409W VS Samsung 2333SW. which is better in terms of image quality. i am in for gaming. and can anyone explain me the difference between dynamic and typical contrast ratio. both typical contrast ratio are the same. but the dynamic contrast ratio of the samsung is 15000:1 but the DELL did not state any.
vinothen
post Feb 7 2009, 06:15 PM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



QUOTE(axbx @ Feb 7 2009, 02:47 PM)
I was confused about that also  biggrin.gif  but thx to all the inputs, I've chosen Dell (but haven't buy yet, end of month  tongue.gif )

About the Contract ratio, I got a detail explanation from cloudwan
Contrast Ratio's

The ratio of the luminosity of the brightest and the darkest color the system is capable of producing simultaneously at any instant of time is called static@typical contrast ratio, while the ratio of the luminosity of the brightest and the darkest color the system is capable of producing over time is called dynamic contrast ratio.

Dynamic contrast ratio

A notable recent development in the LCD technology is the so called "dynamic contrast" (DC). When there is a need to display a dark image, the display would underpower the backlight lamp (or decrease the aperture of the projector's lens using an iris), but will proportionately amplify the transmission through the LCD panel. This gives the benefit of realizing the potential static contrast ratio of the LCD panel in dark scenes, when the image is watched in a dark room. The drawback is that if a dark scene does contain small areas of superbright light, image quality may be over exposed.

The trick for the display is to determine how much of the highlights may be unnoticeably blown out in a given image under the given ambient lighting conditions.

Brightness, as it is most often used in marketing literature, refers to the emitted luminous intensity on screen measured in candela per square metre (cd/m2). The higher the number, the brighter the screen.

It is also common to market only the dynamic contrast ratio capability of a display (when it is better than its static contrast ratio), which should not be directly compared to the static contrast ratio. A plasma display with a static 5000:1 contrast ratio will show superior contrast to an LCD display with 5000:1 dynamic and 1000:1 static contrast ratio when the input signal contains full range of brightnesses from 0 to 100% simultaneously. However they will be on par when input signal ranges only from 0 to 20% brightness.

Soooo it means that everytime it would be much wiser to look at the typical/static contrast ratio comparing to dynamic contrast ratio, the higher the number doesn't mean it would be much better.. It's all just number games by the manufacturer/seller to fool uneducated buyers..

Read here to find out more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_contrast
http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.co...rast-ratio.html

Hope these help
*
i like the way u explain. so ur choosing dell?? well u just opened my eyes. nod.gif so i am also planning to buy DELL. thx for ur info.

This post has been edited by vinothen: Feb 7 2009, 06:17 PM
vinothen
post Feb 8 2009, 09:12 PM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



QUOTE(Boyzgamers @ Feb 8 2009, 08:59 PM)
Can Anyone Suggest me The Best Lcd  22inch

wana replace  my 15inch crt monitor

Budget  Rm680

Thanks!
*
i would recommend u too add RM 20 to get the DELL 24''
vinothen
post Feb 10 2009, 11:26 AM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



DELL S2409W is up for RM700 with OTH. is anyone giving cheaper than this? can i get this product at Low Yat Plaza? pls name me the exact shop.


Added on February 10, 2009, 11:29 am
QUOTE(Zhou @ Feb 10 2009, 02:05 AM)
Dell S2409W
user posted image
*
walawei...i must scroll to see the full pic with my current CRT 17 twinstar monitor.

This post has been edited by vinothen: Feb 10 2009, 11:29 AM
vinothen
post Feb 16 2009, 09:22 PM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



try to see the typical contrast ratio...its much more important.
vinothen
post Feb 25 2009, 03:29 PM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



wah...i post about the acer 23.5'' also missing.
vinothen
post Feb 27 2009, 11:00 AM

1 2 3 4
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Jan 2009



1000000:1 wow...must be good. i mean the dell lcd clearly beaten the new samsung. but is it true?


Added on February 27, 2009, 11:13 am
QUOTE(mememe12 @ Feb 27 2009, 12:36 AM)
i think if after 3 years.. it is quite worth it already.. just use ur LCD "heavily"...

600 / 3 yrs = RM200 / year

200 / 365 days = RM0.5 / day

so u just spend 50cents per day to own the monitor.. it is cheaper than a piece of roti canai or a cup of teh tarik..  sweat.gif

so if can use more than 3 yrs.. i already very satisfy  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
*
some LCD are meant to last according to hours. not days. let's say 50000 hours. if one day u use 8 hours. so one year u use 2920 hours. so the lcd can last for around 17.123 years aporximately. but sometimes u use more than 8 hours. example 12 hours but sometimes u use less than 8 hours. in the end depends on ur usage.


Added on February 27, 2009, 11:15 amthis is for the acer monitor. but some company rarely display the total hours for a lcd to last. some maybe 10000 hours or 5000 hours. lol. we might not know the actual lifespan of the lcd.

This post has been edited by vinothen: Feb 27 2009, 11:15 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0437sec    0.60    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 03:53 AM