Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
andrekua
post Nov 24 2008, 08:49 PM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(rd33 @ Nov 24 2008, 07:29 PM)
of coz can, theres no prob using 512mb version but u will suffer a bit fps drop in game since large monitor ( high reso) will use a lot amount of memory...

GS version is factory OCed GPU and comes with custom cooler, abit expensive than normal gpu 1...

Anyway its all depends on ur budget smile.gif
*
I always see people replied this way but is there any prove that you need more than 512MB VRAM when going over 20" LCD.
Back to those days, yeah, VRAM matters for bit depth and resolution. But since nowadays most GPU has at least 128MB or more, why it matters to have more than 512MB when going over 20"?

GPU job is to render image and send them to the monitor. Its the monitor responsibility to display it. GPU wont hold back the data unless you enable VSYNC. If your LCD unable to keep up with the GPU output, how can it be related to the GPU?
andrekua
post Nov 24 2008, 11:09 PM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Onion-KiD @ Nov 24 2008, 09:50 PM)
It just like processor process data to hard drive. it need access RAM right?

By the way are we a little bit....  sign0006.gif  ?
*
I dont think its off topic if its related to the monitor.

BTW, your assumption is wrong. First of all, GPU has ram too. Instead the hdd works like the monitor too. Receiving data from the CPU and the same can be said for the LCD receiving data from GPU. VRAM should come into question when it comes to resolution used and not the size of LCD being used.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0374sec    0.30    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 11:44 PM