226BW still good or not?
True spec comparison for the 4 cheapest 22" LCD, benQ, Samsung, LG All priced below RM700
True spec comparison for the 4 cheapest 22" LCD, benQ, Samsung, LG All priced below RM700
|
|
Oct 17 2008, 12:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
226BW still good or not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 19 2008, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
Benq come with 3 years warranty right? How about LG and Samsung? Within 5 years, I never upgrade my monitor so this time want to get a very good lcd monitor with longer warranty.
|
|
|
Oct 20 2008, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
QUOTE(plankton @ Oct 20 2008, 12:31 AM) Mind to write some review.What the different between LG W2252TQ and LG W2242T? QUOTE(blindbox @ Oct 20 2008, 10:10 AM) Yeah, I like the price drop. However, I'm going to stick to 16:10, widescreen gaming isn't very broad, and the developers most probably do not like us having super extended view range using 16:9, even 16:10 they already panas. Plus, bigger black borders if you use 16:9 or bigger vertical minus with 16:9, so nah, not my choice. I'll wait for 1920x1200(full hd also what 22" with 1920 x 1080 resolution is like to fit large resolution into smaller screen (normal 1680x1050) and 24" with 1920 x 1080 resolution is like downgrading the total resolution from 1920 x 1200. Which one better? Higher resolution or larger screen size?This post has been edited by qwerty79: Oct 20 2008, 02:36 PM |
|
|
Oct 20 2008, 07:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
|
|
|
Oct 22 2008, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
QUOTE(xtorm @ Oct 22 2008, 10:11 AM) altho my monitor support 1680 x 1050, i use it at 1440x900, at 1680x1050, even on 22" it is abit difficult to read, well to melah atleast, since normally large screen we place it, i got such a big screen i dont wish to stress my eyes That's why I always want to know about text for T2200HD. T2200HD may be good only for movie.duno wheter benq lcd improves or not with the new model, lg is coming out with new model too hence the price drop. QUOTE(plankton @ Oct 22 2008, 11:55 AM) Lucky you. Where do you bought it, which shop? |
|
|
Oct 22 2008, 07:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
From LG website, W2242t has 5ms response time but w2252tq 2ms (GTG). Another difference is the contrast ratio. (10,000 vs 8,000)
|
|
|
Oct 23 2008, 07:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
If not taken off, they still think acer clear or not?
|
|
|
Oct 24 2008, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,907 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Pahang |
Native resolution is the best resolution for a monitor. I try to play DMC4 under lower resolution with my 17" LCD but the picture is not nice, not as good as native resolution. So, for hardcore gamer (PC game) you need to compare your computer spec to match with lcd monitor native resolution before buying. May be 19" is enough.
This post has been edited by qwerty79: Oct 25 2008, 12:00 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0133sec
0.42
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 12:46 AM |