135L still can see CA 

[img]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_CX4AIT7pI8E/SSmEaq3s0pI/AAAAAAAACGY/wwDSlbVYJEY/s512/IMG_2621.jpg[/img
First try with faux tilt-shift
18mm
ISO 800
F8.0
1/40

DIGI NUMBER... where's all the exif for all your pics...

use ISO100 for light trails
and u forgot to put in ur shutter speed

Good Day...my pics for today.....C7C most welcome.

Thanks bro....just bought last month....limited $$$$$ to buy expensive lens....planning to get nikor 105mm 2.8[vr] macro  this month....any ideas where i can get one?? anyone want to sell new or 2nd??

0168257061 : u like to poison people issit?

anyway.. my picture for today
[img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3158/3075069686_2a84c19085.jpg[/img
Camera: Canon EOS 40D
Exposure: 0.005 sec (1/200)
Aperture: f/4
Focal Length: 135 mm
ISO Speed: 400
Flash: Flash did not fire

Noted, first try will try to improve.
1.Move back a bit
2.DOn;t use the extreme of apertures, ok?

Do you have a pic of any food shot to share? I wanna learn thanks.

---

Added on December 2, 2008, 5:15 pm

I thought it was in the olives, My bad i saw it blinking in the vf though, ok ok i will try to improve on it. Thanks

@0168257061 : im using kit lens worr... he's using 50mm prime.. surely his ought to be much sharper

I'd be against that. Since panning involves motion, the IS would be of little effect if you ask me. I'd say that panning would be more to human timing.


It is if you're planning on using your telephoto for indoor events and stuff that involves less than optimal lighting.
If you're planning on taking your telephoto lens for daytime outdoor shots, IS would of course still be helpful, but less important

I tried some new Picture Style. I think this one was "Clear".
Overexcessive PP ftW
The shot was taken at KLIA btw. 
[img]http://lh3.ggpht.com/_CX4AIT7pI8E/SSmEb8q-pgI/AAAAAAAACGg/zs3lza8v3xU/s1024/IMG_2659.JPG[/img

18mm
ISO 100
1/125
F16

Does the sky look too fake?