Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The top five reasons why Windows Vista failed.

views
     
dr2k3
post Jan 25 2009, 08:44 PM

Speculator
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Bermuda Triangle
QUOTE(jem1004 @ Jan 15 2009, 11:10 PM)
True. Why Windows 98se can be consider stable. Because its using monolithic kernel (MSDOS).
Ever since M$ used hybrid kernel (NT) they fail.
Its not because they can't make it stable. They just focus marketing. That's why there always been service pack comes out to stabilize it.
M$ always focus on market strategy. And I'm sure when W7 comes out, a few month later there will be service pack for W7.
That's how M$ makes profit.

I've been using Vista since SP0 and never had any problem with it. No BSOD or anything.
And I'm just using P4 with 1GB of ram only.
People who bash about Vista is because they didn't try it yet or because they faced a problem using it.
Blames yourself for not taking your time learning how to use it.

Btw although I like OpenGL more than DirectX, seem like DX11 wins over OpenGL 3.
CODE
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opengl-directx,2019.html

Another M$ market strategy to make user want to ditch Vista and jump on the bandwagon to W7.
*
i also have no problem running windows xp

i have no idea how u guys justified as "faster" than "something"

because i have tried both and it doesnt look much diff for me...only vista look preetier than xp thats all....

other than that......it took too much ram to load vista...u guys might say just upgrade to bigger ram.......

just imagine u got 1gb ram....50-70% is used just to loadd vista...n only few little left to load application while i can open more application with xp compare to vista

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0130sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 07:42 AM