Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 INTEL P4/PM 478/479 THREAD, >>V7<<,, The Journey Continues Here!

views
     
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 12:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
I have an old Acer Aspire EL (which is based on Acer Veriton VT7200 model) and I intend to do some "crazy and pointless" upgrades sweat.gif

Specs:
-- "Willamette" Pentium 4 @ 1.5 GHz (socket 423) 400MHz FSB - quite a vintage!
-- 3 x 512MB PC133 non-registered non-ECC Kingston SDRAM
-- 160GB IDE HDD
-- Motherboard only supports AGP 4x

Recently, I bought SAPPHIRE HD 3850 512MB GDDR3 AGP (priced at above RM400) to replace Nvidia Geforce FX 5500 256MB AGP.

"The full potential of this card being held back by the obsolete processor" tongue.gif
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=c...=1&limitstart=1

"Grade C: Probably run games" tongue.gif
"I would count on the 512MB to 1.5GB range for lag-free game play." tongue.gif
http://icrontic.com/articles/gaming_system...or_casual_gamer

HD 3850 needs a direct power supply from PSU (I haven't figured out the Watt value of that Acer desktop PC yet). But, it runs well after installing the ATI driver (CCC 8.4) provided together with the card in Windows XP. The card is too long and I had to remove the HDD mounting bay and repositioned all my HDD to other locations inside the desktop casing.

The thing I haven't done is to set the AGP aperture in the BIOS (S81M). Probably due to a bigger video memory (512MB GDDR3) and a limited system memory (1.5GB PC133 SDRAM), I will set a lower AGP aperture size (range available from 4MB to 256MB) but good enough without robbing too much of system memory so that the available system memory can surpass any modern game's system memory requirements. I wish I could upgrade the system memory to 3.0 GB (if and only if I could find very rare 3 x 1GB PC133 SDRAM)

From my experience, the Pentium 4 1.5 GHz maximizes its CPU usage when working with CPU-limited (multi-tasked/multi-threaded) software applications. There are a few jumps on system memory usage but not as critical as the CPU usage.

When using Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 on this system:
NFS: Underground - It ran nicely at higher setting and with a better FPS (good enough for a 3D game with minimal system requirements)
NFS: Undercover - It ran terribly at lower-setting and with a worst FPS. It could only generate broken 3D polygons. Movie cut-scenes played at slow rate

When using SAPPHIRE HD 3850 512MB GDDR3 AGP on this system:
I haven't tried yet since I have removed a lot of 3D games prior to installing this GPU.

Is there a support in the PC game so that it can scale up/down the software-controlled multi-threading support in the game (as it can influence the load on the CPU although correctly programmed threads can complete faster)? This is helpful for single core processors like "Willamette" Pentium. The 100% CPU usage for a multi-threaded game is only good for multi-core processors as it has a lot of cores to spare. But not for single-core processors as they need to handle multiple processes and multiple threads on a single core.

I will give more feedback soon.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 12:59 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 01:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Apr 1 2009, 12:52 PM)
fylon, you just placed a BOMB into bai's pocket. lolz


Added on April 1, 2009, 1:01 pm@eclectice
your upgrade sounds quite "crazy" to me as every cents you pay for the 3850 will not be utilize. maybe half... hmm.gif

if you grap a 6 series or 7 series card, i think the performance will be almost the same like your new 3850. Correct me if i am wrong.
*
Yes, I understand this "crazy and pointless" exercise.

Anyway, where can I get the "Powerleap's Socket 423-to-Socket 478" adapter here locally? With that adapter, I can "upgrade" my current "Willamette" Pentium 4 1.5 GHz to "Northwood" Pentium 4 2.8 GHz. And, maybe I need to see whether the BIOS, southbridge and northbridge of my mobo can work with the new CPU.

Alternatively, I will look for "Willamette" Pentium 4 2.0GHz with Socket 423 (this CPU also has support for Socket 478). Anyone has the spare CPU mentioned?


Added on April 1, 2009, 1:44 pm
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Apr 1 2009, 01:06 PM)
@eclectice, i have a Willy 1.7GHz system at home too but mine is using RDRAM there. Upgrade from FX5500 to ATI3850 is a great move but you will have to suffer the bottleneck from your CPU and RAM as they are pretty slow and have less bandwidth. To complete a task faster,you might definitely need a faster CPU to complete them.
*
Yes, I agree with you. But, I need to get the adapter first. Yes, I will have issue with the slow CPU but I don't think I will have problem with the slow system memory.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 01:53 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 02:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(kabukiawie @ Apr 1 2009, 01:58 PM)
@electice
even with new cpu in i doubt the performance will pump up. if really insist wanna play p4, better grab 2.8ghz+C or E cpu with the mobo. that will serve you better. wink.gif

till then your sdram cant be use already..... another problem... sad.gif
*
I know I can buy a better system, but that is not the point. I want to have "fun" upgrading this "crazy and pointless" exercise on Acer Aspire EL. I will visit computer junk shops to look for old items soon. My main focus of this exercise is looking for the higher speed oldie Pentium CPU and the rare 1GB PC133 SDRAM pieces...

I got some S81M motherboard schematics and equivalent component list from some links (need to get good ones):
http://www.nodevice.com/manual/newmans/115...df/get9970.html
http://www.nodevice.com/images/sm/big/2008...9_00/9970_1.jpg
http://www.nodevice.com/images/sm/big/2008...9_00/9970_2.jpg
http://www.sparesweb.com/acer/Components/D...ponentsf724.htm

Oh my goodness, it seems that I don't need to buy the socket adapter. The Pentium 4 1.5GHz installed on Acer S81M motherboard (478-pins) is actually using Socket 478. I discovered this after reading the S81M motherboard specs from Internet. Maybe, I will physically inspect the CPU soon. It means that I can just try to look for any Pentium 4 with socket 478. What I need to check now is whether the S81M motherboard can support higher than 400MHz FSB. As far as I can go, this mobo is using Intel Brookdale (i845)'s chipset ICH2.

From the component list of Acer Veriton 7200 (equivalent to Acer Aspire EL), it is stated that the PSU unit supplied as standard is a 200W PSU?? Wow, I wonder why it works after installing the Sapphire ATI HD3850 GPU when in fact the GPU needs above 400W... hmm.gif

Pentium 4 CPU statistics
http://www.cpuscorecard.com/cpuprices/ip4.htm

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 02:55 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 04:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Apr 1 2009, 04:19 PM)
electice

instead of a converter for CPU, why not get a S478 mobo

slot in the new AGP card

anyways the cost above actually can get u a whole new rig almost up biggrin.gif
*
I have discovered that Acer Aspire EL with S81M mobo is using Socket 478. So, I am now looking for Pentium 4 with Socket 478 support. I have referred this to my friend who has stocks of old PCs so we will start the project when he is free.


Added on April 1, 2009, 4:40 pm
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Apr 1 2009, 04:38 PM)
@electice, if you are sure that your socket is S478 then is easy. You can just get any proc with 2.4GHz and above. I'm doubt your mobo can support HT.
*
No, I will only look for "Northwood" and "Northwood-B" (excluded the "Northwood-HT") Pentium 4 in this case as S81M mobo is quite an old mobo (year 2001) and I don't think its BIOS can support HT.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 04:42 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 04:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Apr 1 2009, 04:42 PM)
Get a 2.4GHz proc or above if you can. The bottleneck with VGA can be minimize.
*
Yes, I will do my best to get the best Pentium 4 CPU for this S81M mobo.

I know I can find the thermal paste, but where can I get the thermal sticker for the heatsink?

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 04:45 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 05:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(Ryeeson @ Apr 1 2009, 04:50 PM)
ah, i found new purpose on what to do in my old 478 beside than Downloading, watching and storing "X"-Files la. smile.gif just kidding,

Well last time i check there is no good graphic card for AGP slot this day. And not to mention AMD + ATI new CPU would be cheaper.

Sometime ago i just give up on upgrading my 478.
*
"We shall never give up" - Rick Ashley tongue.gif

Well, I think I will try to look for "Northwood" Pentium 4 since this 845 chipset can only support configuration at 400 MHz

QUOTE
Intel® 845 Chipset System Architecture
The MCH provides the processor interface, system memory interface, AGP interface, and hub
interface in an 845 chipset desktop platform. The processor interface supports the Pentium 4
processor subset of the Extended Mode of the Scalable Bus Protocol. The MCH supports a single
channel of PC133 SDRAM. The MCH contains advanced power management logic. The 845
chipset platform supports the I/O Controller Hub 2 (ICH2) to provide the features required by a
desktop platform.


Intel® 82801BA I/O Controller Hub 2 (ICH2)

The ICH2 is a highly integrated multifunctional I/O Controller Hub that provides the interface to
the PCI Bus and integrates many of the functions needed in today’s PC platforms. The MCH and
ICH2 communicate over a dedicated hub interface. The 82801BA ICH2 Functions and capabilities
include:
• PCI Rev 2.2 compliant with support for 33 MHz PCI operations
• Supports up to 6 Request/Grant pairs (PCI slots)
• Power management logic support
• Enhanced DMA controller, interrupt controller, and timer functions
• Integrated IDE controller; Ultra ATA/100/66/33
• USB host interface; 2 host controllers and supports 4 USB ports
• Integrated LAN controller
• System Management Bus (SMBus) compatible with most I2C devices; ICH2 has both bus
master and slave capability
• AC ’97 2.1 compliant link for audio and telephony codecs; up to 6 channels (ICH2)
• Low Pin Count (LPC) interface
• FWH Interface (FWH Flash BIOS support)
• Alert on LAN* (AOL and AOL2)

Intel® 82845 MCH Overview
The MCH role in a system is to manage the flow of information between its four interfaces: the
system bus, the memory interface, the AGP port, and the hub interface. The MCH arbitrates
between the four interfaces, when each initiates an operation. While doing so, the MCH supports
data coherency via snooping and performs address translation for access to AGP Aperture
memory. To increase system performance, the MCH incorporates several queues and a write
cache.
The MCH is in a 593 pin FC-BGA package and contains the following functionality:
• Supports single Pentium 4 processor configuration at 400 MHz
• AGTL+ system bus with integrated termination supporting 32-bit system bus addressing
• Up to 3 GB (w/ 512 Mb technology) of PC133 SDRAM
• 1.5 V AGP interface with 4x SBA/data transfer and 2x/4x fast write capability
• 8 bit, 66 MHz 4x hub interface to the ICH2
• Distributed arbitration for highly concurrent operation

System Memory Interface
The MCH directly supports one channel of PC133 SDRAM. The memory interface supports
Single Data Rate (SDR) devices with densities of 64 Mb, 128 Mb, 256 Mb, and 512 Mb
technology. The memory interface also supports variable page sizes of 2 KB, 4 KB, 8 KB, and
16 KB. Page size is individually selected for every row and a maximum of 8 pages per DIMM may
be opened simultaneously.
The MCH supports a maximum of 3 double-sided DIMMs (6 rows populated) with unbuffered
PC133 (with or without ECC) Note that in mixed mode, populating ECC and Non-ECC memories
simultaneously is not supported.

Memory Capacity

Technology SDR (PC133) Maximum (double-density x 3 SIMM slots)
64 Mb                             384 MB
128 Mb                           768 MB
256 Mb                           1.5 GB
512 Mb                           3 GB

Added on April 1, 2009, 5:13 pm
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Apr 1 2009, 04:57 PM)
lol

i got S478 Pentium 4 2.4GHZ Northwood HT processor tongue.gif

anyways, last time i read that my X800 already bottleneck the 2.4, i wouldnt want to imagine 3850 biggrin.gif
*
NVM, as long as I can get the best "Northwood" Pentium 4 CPU. I need a faster "Northwood" Pentium 4 CPU to make sure it can properly process the keystroke events, not to emphasize on the performance of the GPU against the CPU. It is acceptable that CPU limits the performance of HD 3850 GPU.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 05:16 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 05:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Apr 1 2009, 05:28 PM)
@eclectice,you can get any Northwood with the best speed. Your mobo chipset doesn't support on HT.It's better to get the 400/533 bus speed proc. Afraid some HT proc can't work properly on your mobo.
*
Yes, I am looking for the "Northwood" (400MHz FSB), not the "Northwood-B" (533MHz FSB) and not "Northwood-HT" (HT + 533/800MHz FSB).

The highest of the "Northwood" (400MHz FSB) is 2.6 GHz with 2 x 256MB = 512 MB L2 cache (double the size of the L2 cache of the "Willamette" Pentium 4 CPU)


Added on April 1, 2009, 5:40 pm
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Apr 1 2009, 05:31 PM)
i thought bios can disable HT ?

then shouldnt be a problem anymore, even with HT proc
*
The S81M BIOS does not support HT.

If it does not support HT, it will not trigger the HT support in HT-capable Pentium 4 CPU.

Anyway, this S81M mobo's 845 chipset (MCH + ICH2) does not support 533/800MHz FSB, so HT-capable Pentium 4 CPU (533/800MHz FSB) is out of reach.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 1 2009, 05:47 PM
eclectice
post Apr 1 2009, 06:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Apr 1 2009, 06:14 PM)
No,the 845 chipset doesn't support HT proc.

@eclectice,hope you can get the 2.4GHz or 2.6GHz in garage sales.Good luck.
*
I will look into that option too. Thanks!
eclectice
post Apr 4 2009, 10:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Continuing my discussion on my "crazy and pointless" upgrades on Acer Aspire EL (see my signature).

I have just bought CoolerMaster Silent Pro M Series 500W PSU to accommodate more juice to Sapphire ATI Radeon HD3850 512MB GDDR3 AGP-based card on Acer S81M mobo.

Wow, the new 500W PSU is so "blacky-cool" and quiet. And, my GPU is so happy with the extra power compared to the stock 200W PSU. This time, I just connect the 6+2 PCI-E power connector available on the new PSU directly to the 2x4 PCI-E power port on the GPU card instead of using the two 4-pin Molex-to-2x4 PCI-E power connector adapter. This GPU card requires more than 30A on +12V rail which is equivalent to 360W. This new PSU provides 34A on +12V single rail which is equivalent to 408W, above the requirement of the GPU card. Power efficiency is above 80%. The heat is dissipated quite well by this PSU unit as it has a big fan on its top to channel the hot air inside the casing to its grilled rear panel before the hot air is released to the outside.

The installation of the new PSU unit is quite tricky due to the design of the Acer Aspire EL casing. The PSU room area is too narrow for this new PSU with the dimension: 150x150x86 (mm), leaving a tight and small space for cables to pass through the cavity (especially the cables from the storage devices). I have to cram the cables carefully to make sure everything are tight in their places.

Since S81M mobo is an old ATX12V version 1.0, it uses 20-pin main power cable and a 4-pin power cable (for CPU). Luckily this new PSU (ATX12V version 2.3) supplies a 20+4-pin main power cable and a 4+4-pin power cable.

I have tried the new setup to play NFS:Undercover. The GPU is so powerful and can handle the graphics so good despite the CPU-limit of the Pentium 4 "Willamette" 1.5 GHz on 400MHz FSB. The graphics generated by Sapphire ATI Radeon HD3850 512MB GDDR3 are so nice at high-quality. It suffers the slowness of the CPU, so I have to set to a low resolution setting at 640x480 for the game to be playable. CPU processes the keystroke events with some delays, but this is tolerable.

I am still looking for faster Pentium "Northwood" 4 2.6GHz so that it can handle keystroke events properly in a high-powered PC game.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 4 2009, 12:59 PM
eclectice
post Apr 4 2009, 01:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(fylon @ Apr 4 2009, 10:36 AM)
@eclectice
Any nice picture for your setup? brows.gif
*
I will put the pictures once I have completed my "crazy and pointless" project.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 4 2009, 02:06 PM
eclectice
post Apr 4 2009, 05:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(edministrator @ Apr 4 2009, 03:47 PM)
@eclectice,
i once had a P4 2.8Ghz Northwood 400FSB, top of the line at that time, sold off briefly later. If you are interested in a 2.4Ghz just let me know, I might be able to assist.
*
Interesting... can you provide the CPU part/specs no. of that Pentium 4 "Northwood" 2.8 GHz even though you've sold it? I am surprised to read that Pentium 4 "Northwood" 2.8 GHz can support 400MHz FSB. As far as I know Pentium 4 "Northwood (130 nm)" 2.8 GHz uses 533MHz FSB

The picture below is a Pentium 4 "Prescott (90nm)" with 1MB L2 cache and 533 MHz FSB (not suitable for my mobo):
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL7E2
user posted image

Can you give me the CPU part/specs no. for Pentium 4 "Northwood" 2.4GHz that you have? I want to check it on the Internet first before I decide since my target is the top of the line for 400MHz FSB "Northwood" design which is at 2.6GHz.

Intel® Pentium® 4 Processors 2.60 GHz, 512 KB L2 Cache, 400 MHz FSB (Socket 478)
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL6SB
Box Order Code: BX80532PC2600D
OEM Order Code: RK80532PC064512

Updates:
Nevermind, I confirm that Pentium 4 "Northwood" 2.8 GHz can support 400MHz FSB
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL7EY
Box Order Code: not available
OEM Order Code: RK80532PC072512
It is a rare one since it is only available to OEM and not as a retail boxed version.

List of possible Pentium 4 processors:
http://processorfinder.intel.com/List.aspx...=483&SearchKey=

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 4 2009, 06:18 PM
eclectice
post Apr 13 2009, 10:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
I have came to the important milestone in my "crazy and pointless" upgrade project on Acer Aspire EL.

I got Pentium 4 "Northwood" 2.6 GHz (512KB L2 cache, 400MHz FSB) from Imbi Plaza at a reasonable price, plugged it into my S81M mobo (400MHz FSB), spreaded some CoolerMaster ThermalFusion 400 thermal paste and voila! It ran faster than my previous Pentium 4 "Willamette" 1.5GHz (256KB L2 cache, 400MHz FSB.)

I played NFS:Undercover again and the user events responded better than my old setup (no more stupid delays when punching the keys.)

Now, what I need to improve is my PC133 SDRAM modules since one of the DIMM modules is not running at the correct configuration (Apacer PC142??). Maybe, I will try to look for the rare 1GB PC133 SDRAM (not server-type) if possible.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 13 2009, 10:43 AM
eclectice
post Apr 13 2009, 12:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(dlwl @ Apr 13 2009, 12:10 PM)
i also have that problem, my apacer pc133 running at weird speeds as you mentioned. it cant run together with my kingston pc133, the pc will boot but keep restarting at the windows boot screen. what i did was to downclock it to pc100 only, but then it's kinda wasted to downclock it
*
I don't face that kind of problem you've mentioned. But, I know that when SDRAM modules are not properly synchronized, it will interfere with the memory read/write operations as there are memory banks with slow and high speed intermix.

I notice that my Enermax Cluster 80mm PWM case fan (12V) is not working well for old motherboard design like S81M. S81M have three fan headers with 3-pin design (one for CPU fan, two for non-CPU fans). These 3-pin fan headers are designed for voltage-drop fans and they could not support PWM fan design except with some modification to shut off the PWM circuitry in the PWM fan.

When I use this Enermax Cluster case fan (with 4-pin design) onto any 3-pin header available on the mobo, my Windows will not shutdown properly at a certain condition, usually when I use the PC for a longer time (where heat introduces resistance). The PSU, PWM fan and GPU are still active even when the hard disk has been powered down. I have to manually switch off the power using the power switch of my PSU. It is also the same even if I use the 4-pin Molex connector adapter that is used to connect to PSU directly rather than to the mobo.

I have monitored the voltage fluctuations on +12V rail sensed by SMSC chip. It seems that the PWM fan (which is operating at 0.5A, 0.5A x 12V = 6W) is introducing a current load higher than the expected power down current threshold required by S81M. Adding this current load to S81M will give an impact to the ability for the PC to power down properly. I need a way to regulate the voltage to the PWM fan to reduce the current load or maybe I have to resort to voltage-drop controlled fan with 3-pin design.

http://www.howtofixcomputers.com/forums/ha...ard-214194.html

Another alternative to get these products:

http://www.zalman.co.kr/ENG/product/Product_Read.asp?Idx=329

FAN MATE controller
http://www.zalman.co.kr/ENG/product/Product_Read.asp?Idx=206

FAN MATE controller seems to tell something interesting:

QUOTE
When booting a computer in which FAN MATE 2 is used with the CPU fan, an alarm sound may be generated by a system monitoring program to indicate that the rotation of the CPU fan is slow.

If this happens, you may turn the speed control knob fully clockwise to increase the fan speed, set 'CPU Fan Detected' to 'Disabled' in the BIOS settings, or set the slowest rotation of the CPU fan in the system monitoring program to less than or equal to 1500 RPM.

* Some mainboards do not boot if the rotation of the CPU fan is below a certain number of RPM. If the BIOS settings are updated, Silent Mode can be used. For more information on updating your BIOS , please refer to your mainboard manufacturer's web site.


It can be implied that the mainboard will not power down if the rotation of the CPU fan is above the number of RPM. This is true with PWM fan as the fan will operate at full speed if the PWM line is not connected. In this case, my Enermax will run at max. 2000 RPM which is above 1500 RPM.

So, I need to get the non-PWM case fan with 3-pin design that only works at max. 1500 RPM or draw less than 6W with minimum startup voltage at 5V.

QUOTE
Some motherboards have difficulty measuring low fan RPM speeds on CPU coolers. The problem can sometimes be fixed by updating the motherboard BIOS to the latest version available on the motherboard manufacturer's website. However, with some motherboards, the problem remains. Regardless, this will not affect performance. In addition, some motherboards will not boot if the CPU fan speed cannot be measured, as a safety feature.

http://www.quietpc.com/gb-en-gbp/faq


http://www.quietpc.com/nz/casefansacc.html

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 13 2009, 06:00 PM
eclectice
post Apr 18 2009, 12:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(edministrator @ Apr 17 2009, 10:58 PM)
correction: kabu's not amd, it's c2d. yeah, better stick to topic, no more off topics.  shakehead.gif  sounds like kopitiam already.

another survey for 2nite, how many of you using non-stock cooler for your P4?  thumbup.gif  dell p4 workstations and servers has superb customised cooling, where as other brands like acer or packard bell using normal generic OEM cooler (like the amd stock cooler type). will snap some pics and post here next week when i m back to work.
*
Dell usually uses the blower design especially for models with BTX motherboards.

This post has been edited by eclectice: Apr 18 2009, 12:05 AM
eclectice
post May 1 2009, 09:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
I managed to play the Crysis demo copy (from PC Gamer DVD August 2008) on Acer Aspire EL mod (since I couldn't install the original Crysis DVD copy due to CRC error).

Surprisingly, the game runs well and smoothly at "High" setting with the resolution of 1024x768.
eclectice
post May 1 2009, 10:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(Jcsy @ May 1 2009, 09:18 PM)
you should be able to hit MEDIUM settings on 1280x1024, i could too biggrin.gif

however there is 1 part where u are in some ice canyon and it lags horribly there to even play .. lol biggrin.gif
*
I have tried 1280x1024 (High mode) and the output does look better than 1024x768 (High mode). But, the game hangs when it tries to render the sunlit ocean and beach during dawn. So, I stays at 1024x768 which is more stable and smooth. The demo game disables the "Very High" mode. The demo version ends at "Lusca's Call" episode.

Updated: I've tried the AA 8x and it runs flawlessly at 1024x768.

I will try to get the actual FPS displayed by using "r_DisplayInfo = 1".

This post has been edited by eclectice: May 1 2009, 10:30 PM
eclectice
post May 2 2009, 12:01 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(Jcsy @ May 1 2009, 10:47 PM)
mine has difficulty on 1280 already, lol my rig biggrin.gif

1024 i never bothered coz it doesnt look nice at all even on HIGH with everything turned on

i rather have a MEDIUM 1280 smile.gif

however your card has more memory so i suppose it can handle higher resolutions better
*
It seems that the reason why the Crysis demo game hangs on my rig is because of an infinite loop while processing the keystroke events rapidly. This will happen when the system memory is low (less than 100-200 MB of available memory; my total of 1.5 GB RAM). It does not matter even if the CPU is 100% high. It can be improved if I can get 2.0 GB or more RAM.

This post has been edited by eclectice: May 2 2009, 12:03 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0367sec    0.71    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:09 AM