Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
All About Badminton Equipment v2, Racket, Shoes, Grip, String, Cocks
|
hamboldt
|
 Sep 10 2010, 08:21 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(alan kc @ Sep 10 2010, 06:54 PM) Ok...if u put d 2 racket 2gether,then u look at d side of that frame.do u notice that z is more slim..bt d 2 side of that frame is box..then d bs frame more fat..bt d 2 side at d frame is sharp shape..so can cut d air.box shape cant cut d air bt bcoz slim u can swing it easily. With the slimmer side frame doesn't reveal that it will have faster swing speed, each manufacturer have their own design for the aerodynamic frame as they need to consider the material used, inner strengthen material, the power generated by each design and etc. But each design serve the same purpose, faster swing speed and satisfaction of the players... If you want to know which can swing faster, you will really need to have both racket, hit a shuttlecock with the same person with a speed gun, but the results still will have little non-conformance error due to not every hit will be the exactly same... |
|
|
|
|
|
hamboldt
|
Sep 10 2010, 10:57 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(alan kc @ Sep 10 2010, 08:47 PM) Yup..hav to test it...bt slim shaft is easy swing for example changing position from left to right or up to down...aerodynamic is d timing u hit d shuttle more faster compare to box shape. In my opinion, the maneuverability is neither depend on the racket box frame shape nor an aerodynamic frame, it will mostly depend on the racket balance and the weight of the racket... Even you have a aerodynamic frame but your racket head balance is like something like AT700, can you swing around like NS9900 that having a box frame but with a head light balance?... The aerodynamic frame only function when you swing your racket to hit the shuttlecock, not when you move your racket around your body... |
|
|
|
|
|
hamboldt
|
Sep 11 2010, 12:12 AM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(Omage007 @ Sep 10 2010, 11:10 PM) no need to make thing complicated, there is a reason why racket got this technology that technology; don't compare difference racket modal, imagine now NS9900 got another new modal name NS9900B, everything is same as NS9900 but it got aerodynamic frame, so you think which one can swing faster now? NS9900 or NS9900B? It is that complicated, everyone has their own preference racket and it will complicated to say that not everyone will like the same racket... Yeah, you have make a point on the aerodynamic frame of NS9900, but do mind that every racket have their own aerodynamic frame design but just how good is the aerodynamic frame, we don't know and just leave to the players or the manufacturer to say so... Just like we can't really compare whether you like a Ferrari or Bugati aerodynamic system and which do you think it will gave you faster speed... |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0196sec
0.75
7 queries
GZIP Disabled