http://www.expreview.com/review/2008-09-19...7775d10042.html
1. It runs much better in games. At this stage it's expected to beat a 3Ghz Athlon 6000+, might even win the 6400+.
2. It uses 20W more compared to K8. Mostly because AMD's 65nm Phenoms had some problems scaling down. Undervolt for less power use though.
3. It OCs to 3.3Ghz with SB750. On air.
4. ~RM350 I think.
Clock for clock compared to the old Athlons:
Normal Apps: 5-10%
Special cases (Excel, TMPEnc): ~50%
Games: 20+%
Comments? This is one of the more decent CPUs AMD has made this year (compared to a ****ton of undervalued crap). It's still meant for OCers who are gamers, who use AM2+ and are looking for a cheap upgrade. I'll wait for Deneb (need quad core) but for the RM300-400 range, this is the new AMD CPU to get. Not for sissies though.
So much for the people who said that Phenoms are bad for gaming, get a dual core instead, ey?
Remember this is 2.3Ghz

This post has been edited by X.E.D: Sep 21 2008, 08:44 AM
Sep 21 2008, 08:39 AM, updated 18y ago
Quote










0.4248sec
0.32
6 queries
GZIP Disabled