
A200, f/5.6, 60mm , iso400 (LX3 could use iso100 with f/2.8 in this situation)
LX3 , f/2.8 , 60mm , iso400 (photoshop reduce noise, still retain more details than a200)
A200, f/5.6 , 60mm , iso1600
LX3 , f/2.8 , 60mm , iso400
LX3 can perform just as good A200 in low light, @ lower ISO and bigger apperture.
not to prove LX3 got better iso, but just show that it has big advantage in the big apperture that allows it to shoot @ lower ISO.
A200 resized
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
LX3 resized
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
This post has been edited by daruma: Sep 16 2008, 09:53 AM
Sep 16 2008, 09:36 AM, updated 18y ago


Quote
0.0203sec
0.60
5 queries
GZIP Disabled