okay, i do realize that this is a spam post.

but ... i'm a new proud owner of this sweet mama!

i should get going. many drivers to download

damn.

i have problem downloading from ftp site.

anybody has alternative link for xp drivers?

if you're naturally ignorant, i've read 1st page.

er, it's a common rule. normally higher clock = faster speed.

since 780G support 800mhz, its a waste if one opted for 667mhz.

IMO, that phrase you quoted weren't even legit.

This post has been edited by cracksys: Nov 27 2008, 11:12 PM

read up 780G spec, it says it support 800Mhz.

re-arrange the example sentence. it doesn't make any sense .. and AMD ditched that old FSB crap long ago.

i'm sorry but i can't figure out the connection between AMD and UMC producing a more fast-memory-friendly processor. care to elaborate?

ah, that thing. different abbreviation, no wonder i haven't heard of it.

almost all of the newer intel processor able to fully utilized DDR2 800mhz thanks to their higher FSB, so UMC factor doesn't fit in (unless you're talking about Pentium D).

RM-70 support HT2.0 so..

667mhz will run at 667mhz
800mhz will run at 800mhz
1066mhz will only run at 1000mhz



This post has been edited by cracksys: Nov 29 2008, 12:17 AM

yup.

it is guaranteed to run at 800Mhz. noticeable change in real-life experience, not guaranteed.

you seriously need to re-read my post.

i said ..

almost all of the newer intel processor [core 2 duo, dual core, quad core] able to fully utilized DDR2 800mhz thanks to their higher FSB [starting from 800mhz] , so UMC factor doesn't fit in [UMC gain an upper hand only when K8 vs Netburst] (unless you're talking about Pentium D[which suck. i add this line so that no fag come in and said "Pentium D also quite new what!"]).

eekk.. duh!

This post has been edited by cracksys: Nov 29 2008, 05:38 AM

you're a confused person.

no, getting a stick with higher clock speed will NOT ALWAYS be better than going dual channel. if you mean, getting a stick of 1066mhz of DDR1 over 2 stick of dual channel enabled of 400mhz DDR1, then yes, your statement is true.

but, 1 stick of 800mhz ddr2 will always be slower (mathematically, 66% slower) than 2 stick 667mhz ddr2 running on dual channel because of doubled data transfer rate offered by dual channel tech.

of course there is other factor, latency usually lower in lower clock ram, which, theoretically means faster operation. ultimately, it's down to the fact that real life experience won't change noticeably unless benchmark were to be use.

care to share what ram model you've used for the benchmark?

This post has been edited by cracksys: Nov 29 2008, 12:07 PM

^

higher speed + lower latency = expensive model = faster, it is not higher speed = low latency = all model = faster. straighten that up or understand what it latency first before pointing my wrong.

i am merely correcting your general statement about dual channel but in no way, i disputed your benchmark results. no need to be so defensive.

This post has been edited by cracksys: Nov 29 2008, 12:47 PM

damn it. i knew i should wait just a lil bit longer.

get yourself a decent laptop cooler, you'll be fine. max i hit in a non-cond room is 68c [hd3450]

i'm sorry but i can't help myself from replying.

UMC is NOT the most important determinant factor on whether or not you can fully utilise the 800MHz RAM, it is the memory bus. this will be only absolutely true if we're talking about K8-netburst era. right now, as every platform in the market with HT2.0-3.0 ready and intel following AMD step integrating memory controlled into the processor, that statement is outdated.

i didn't really want to argue to this extend. i just wanted to correct the statement of ..


.. which was initially quoted by antonio.

This post has been edited by cracksys: Nov 29 2008, 02:37 PM

^ Everest 4.6

HT is still limiting your running memory frequency, even though you probably won't reach that limit because HT2.0 bus were able to support up to 2000mhz. unless you're running a freaking 2000mhz ddr2

pardon me, i knew about HT replacing FSB but you clearly didn't understand what both really are.

already out ask wingster

weird. i'm playing sins of a solar empire smoothly. maybe it is just a bad game.

processor temp or its core?

you should start reading newspaper..

and oh, sig oversized.

did they mention about unchange air flow design?

only retarded have difficulties choosing between HD3200 and HD3450.

and retarded do compare desktop with laptop.