QUOTE(99below0 @ Sep 25 2008, 05:47 PM)
However, Plasma's superior blacks coupled with the pixel structure design produces somewhat softer picture with deeper color. This 'softness' is what hides the artifacts. It's there, just not so obvious. If you switch up to a Monster Cable, you will see it more obviously, especially if you also upscale to 1080p.
LCDs, on the other hand, are just bleedingly sharp with high contrast, and because you don't have a screen-door effect like plasma, artifact-ridden areas tend to get all mushy into each other. To over-ride this, most LCDs will have a more powerful noise reduction system, so it will look smoother, but you lose detail.
Oh! Right, you are correct.
Almost forget that Plasma has better color/black level, which show smooth color/black tone where LCD not able to reach this level.
Maybe can explain in this way:
Plasma almost able to reproduce all the colour whatever the source is, but LCD's 8bit/10bit panel that had very limited color/black level range. In order to display the whole picture which had too much colour, it will try to round up/down some of the color pixel to the nearest one, which make the color looks obvious. Some more LCD always use dynamic contrast to sharpen the picture which make it 'WOW' in some case but make it worst if the source is so bad.
BTW, peoples keep saying that LCD is not fast enough that's why has Motion Blur effect. But what I heard is, it is not the problem of the speed, it is because LCD do not have screen-door effect, which keep the whole picture on at every moment. So, the problem is human's eye. When the picture light stay too long in your eyes, you will have some kind of image memory effect in your brain, that's when the picture frame change to next, you have both frame in your mind which cause the blur effect. Is is true ?
And that's why lot of LCD now start implement 100Hz, which is either insert a 'calculated' image or a black image to shorthen the time of each frame on the screen to prevent memory effect.