no other improvement ah_khoo?
maybe tweaking the ram?
AMD® Socket-AM2&AM2+ Overclocking V10, ~overcooking ur proc here~
AMD® Socket-AM2&AM2+ Overclocking V10, ~overcooking ur proc here~
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 10:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
no other improvement ah_khoo?
maybe tweaking the ram? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 11:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
now intel tiru amd on IMC.. lol
|
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 12:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
amd truly on another market.. not on speed wise but more to performance sufficiency thus budget
|
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 09:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 3 2008, 09:04 AM) Intel Nehalem seem like not really to overclockers likes. prob with IMC like amd last time.. not tolerant with high voltage... Hope Deneb doing better than Nehalem. -pWs- bigger cache on amd should great.. QUOTE(tictac @ Sep 3 2008, 09:08 AM) import.. |
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 10:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
wait am3 mobo la..
|
|
|
Sep 4 2008, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 4 2008, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
becoz it's brisbane..
|
|
|
Sep 4 2008, 01:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 11:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 12:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 09:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
now i'm regret selling mine.. but in the quest of the green.. phenom should not in my book..
but i really want to see later phenom.. wish they cut the power consumption.. |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 02:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 03:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Sep 12 2008, 02:56 PM) Dude, you are right. But the problem is the PSU +12V (which is what GPU want) does not total up to 400W. that's the total system power consumption while benchmarking..i'm using 3870 and pair with 3ghz brisbane with 400W still ok.. 3870 n 4850 not much differ on power usage.. thus 450W still ok for him.. unless we always arguing on it's not pure power.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 03:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
if 400W is ok (actually less) for 4850 CF..
then single gpu will be ok with oc cpu.. on 450W psu.. *please bear in mind CF was tested on 4ghz OCed wolfdale |
|
|
Sep 12 2008, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
EXAMPLE for the newbie
AMD 5600+ (200x14 = 2800Mhz) HTT = 200 CPU MUL = 14 refer to the divider chart for cpu multiplier 14 becoz non BE (Black Edition) have been locked upwards multiplier so we cannot increase the value to multiply with HTT in order to increase the cpu speed the only option we need to increase cpu speed is by the increase of HTT ie : 215x14 = 3010Mhz in AMD RAM/ddr2 divider often stated in bios as 1 or 400 2 or 533 3 or 667 (normally we choose this) 4 or 800 how the ram divider related to HTT? and how to choose correct RAM speed? look again on the chart below multiplier 14 we can see 400->/14 533->/11 667->/9 800->/7 the numbers in bold above are the value that we need to divide with cpu speed in order to obtain the memory speed - if we set 4 or 800 in bios the value we have is 7 since we chose 3 or 667 in bios the value is 9 ie: 3010/9 = 334Mhz (memory speed) on ddr2 must multiply by 2 so 668 is ddr2 speed (this is where ur ram capable of) we can choose different -ram divider -increase the HTT -change cpu multiplier downward to search the balance of our cpu/ram speed... so we knew how to calculate.. later we can slowly learn on bios/ram tweak |
|
|
Sep 13 2008, 02:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
on cpuz got that memory details.. post that too..
|
|
|
Sep 13 2008, 09:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2008, 01:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
bro digswell better don't discuss it openly..
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2008, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
news about this?
![]() |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0209sec
0.22
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 04:33 AM |