Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Official Anti-Virus Thread, General antivirus discussion

views
     
bean_man
post Nov 3 2006, 09:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(natakaasd @ Oct 21 2006, 12:31 PM)
Kaspersky updates its files according to certain chronological orders... It will be confusing for the end-user themselves to "install" the definition files. (Just like NOD32) So, I guess, we have to stick with their partial-file update system...
*
I actually believe the biggest reason for the none availability of offline update files is due to the business model. Less offline circulating, less chances of piracy (not wholly applicable... i know many rigs which are never on the network so no update.). Anyway who would want to manuall install files 2-3 times day just to keep updated cos if you missed the update, then you are exposed already.
Of top of that i was made to understand that the files are actually verified and must be installed in a certain manner into the system to avoid corruption of the checksum( could be bullshit though...). I must admit i never got a clean answer even from the support guys.


bean_man
post Dec 11 2006, 01:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
371 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(deric88 @ Dec 11 2006, 09:40 AM)
so avast vs kapersky anyone?
resource, virus detection factors
*
Hi,
see www.av-comparatives.org
Look under the comparatives adn you'll get 2 sets of comparatives...the full info on detection is there. Speed is relative...

hope this helps...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0301sec    0.87    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 04:42 PM