QUOTE(cardin @ Mar 31 2009, 01:15 PM)
seem that amax was very good wimax provider, no FUP oooo see THIS read point no. 4. DUOCORE - when my area cover by amax?? telok panglima garang
AMAX, AsiaSpace Wimax
|
|
Mar 31 2009, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Mar 31 2009, 01:15 PM) seem that amax was very good wimax provider, no FUP oooo see THIS read point no. 4. DUOCORE - when my area cover by amax?? telok panglima garang |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2009, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
yups..FUP is fair usage policy, that give headache to heavy user customer to dload/upload,
others wimax provider, packet one implemented FUP, only amax doesn't do that, very very good policy ooo this amax,speed also not bad, BUT coverage bad, no coverage to my area |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 08:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 10:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 09:49 AM) u wan feedback ah?? i'l giv u 1...I WAN MORE COVERAGE!!!!...dats all i nid from AMAX 4 now bcoz da rest are yups ..correct, more coverage, more faster u cover, more untung la amax, why 2011 ? not enough staff or waiting something ?? Added on April 1, 2009, 10:39 am QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 09:49 AM) u wan feedback ah?? i'l giv u 1...I WAN MORE COVERAGE!!!!...dats all i nid from AMAX 4 now bcoz da rest are yups ..correct, more coverage, more faster u cover, more untung la amax, why 2011 ? not enough staff or waiting something ?? This post has been edited by suriah: Apr 1 2009, 10:39 AM |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 02:37 PM) yalorr...cause komputer technology going very fast oooo, no choice, need to wait amax 2 more years cover whole nation as promise, hopefully not "angan-angan mat jenin" or "hangat2 taik ayam" |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 03:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 02:51 PM) dun worry...government already said that those Wimax license holders who cannot expand their coverage as wanted wil b terminated... that also have pro and conpro - make all wimax provider expand their coverage con - if 4 of 5 those wimax licence provider got terminated, the one wimax provider will dominate wimax service ooooo, even if have 2 only wimax provider also they will "main-main" to improve service. |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 03:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 03:14 PM) even wif 4-5 providers available now they also "play2"...if they r not playin around im sure P1 n AMAX already covered da whole klang valley... the most thing i'm curios with wimax is their theory will got signal as far as 50km away broadcast. so practically my home should get wimax coverage, as i see ss13 subang jaya covered with wimax and distance from ss13 to telok panglima only 36km, suppose to get wimax oooo, why cannot get signal ???is it because wimax provider just sangkut their terminal atas bumbung building?? or suppose use actual infrastructure to boost signal to 50km ?? anyone from amax staff can answer this ?? This post has been edited by suriah: Apr 1 2009, 03:24 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 03:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
-removed-
This post has been edited by suriah: Apr 1 2009, 04:09 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 03:39 PM) if im not mistaken....wireless signals get shorter wif an increase of user....mins more user less coverage...correct me if im wrong... haiyaa... not celah gigi laaa... check HERE click on subang jaya. ss19,ss18,ss17 very very near with ss13 a few km only ooo. ss13 was centre of amax coverage, see subang jaya industrial estate, then also no coverage..1 more thing suriah...r u sure da BTS is located at SS13 subang jaya? could b 50km away from ss13 subang jaya...dats y telok panglima dun hav da signal...ss13 myb "celah gigi only" who knows.. BTS ?? short form of what ?? funny oooo, theory wrong as practical p/s : double post, accidentally double click, how to delete the 1st one ?? This post has been edited by suriah: Apr 1 2009, 03:58 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 04:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 04:05 PM) BTS refers 2 Base Transceiver Station....wht?...not even 10km ar? hahahaa...myb its Wifi lor not Wimax... sure ka?could be need duocore to explain it with concrete facts juz edit n del al words then type -removed- dats al i know...uhuhuh.. BTW, thanks for -removed- |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(@DUOCORE @ Apr 1 2009, 09:33 PM) each BTS only radius 10km to 15km. Depands geo also, certain2 area block by hill, building and etc. That will reduce signal distance ma....i agreed with cardin words....if ur place like "Sahara" sure u can receive signal. huhuhuhu.....one way to solve problem, using a lot repeater. Dont worry, all activity for each Wimax provider monitor by MCMC. goverment not simply give license to us lor..... but why info said can receive to 50km?why not said can receive 15km and need to put repeater to boost the signal back?most customer over estimated wimax capability oooo.we as customer imagine that wimax was very superb technology that will solve wireless problem which can penetrate all sort of blocking either building,hill,mount,tree and etc This post has been edited by suriah: Apr 1 2009, 09:45 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 09:44 PM) i found diz --> wah...cardin...ur answer very very technical and concrete facts. u work with wimax provider laaa...talented laaa.. QUOTE(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimax) A commonly-held misconception is that WiMAX will deliver 70 Mbit/s over 50 kilometres (~31 miles). In reality, WiMAX can either operate at higher bitrates or over longer distances but not both: operating at the maximum range of 50 km increases bit error rate and thus results in a much lower bitrate. Conversely, reducing the range (to <1m) allows a device to operate at higher bitrates. There are no known examples of WiMAX services being delivered at bit rates over around 3Mbps. yup its tru...wimax can b within 50km...but it wil reduce da bitrates...in diz case AMAX can only provide within 10km-15km in order 2 maximize da bitrates...then ok lor...if 50km also da bitrates slower than dial up wht 4 isn't it?useless...ok, this answer acceptable |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2009, 09:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 09:53 PM) hahaha...no la...im juz sum1 who try 2 learn sumtin new evrydy...uhhuhu...neway we share da knowledge rite?... good. keep the good jobs. anyway, now i'm understand why ss13 subang jaya got signal while very near to subang jaya ss19,ss18 and etc doesn't got signal..learn something new today |
|
|
Apr 2 2009, 09:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 1 2009, 11:52 PM) same like maxis n celcom case long time ago...celcom currently using GSM1800 whereas maxis using GSM900....GSM1800 is only 4 short distance n can cover small area only while GSM900 can cover large area....bcoz of dat GSM900 can transmit da signals 2 many users in 1 area compared 2 GSM1800 bcoz it can provide wide coverage n cover up large area...dats y maxis always jam (cannot send sms n make a cal) bcoz da BTS sims 2 b failed 2 handle 2 many users in 1 time...GSM1800 handle less user than GSM900 bcoz of da coverage range...dats y GSM1800 dun hav many prob since it can only cover smal area...smal area mins less user...less user mins more bandwidth...more bandwidth mins gud speed... ur technical explanation is good but the cons is GSM1800 i think need to put a lot at same area, means could be 2 GSM1800 = 1 GSM900, right ?? |
|
|
Apr 2 2009, 09:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
570 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Telok Panglima Garang |
QUOTE(cardin @ Apr 2 2009, 09:18 AM) icic..good network technical knowledge..i didn't realize about that GSM concept, thanks for ur explanation. hoho..that why la rupanya celcom got more coverage..cause they invest a lot of money to install BTS oooo |
| Change to: | 0.0378sec
0.60
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 08:33 PM |