this is awesome.Gonna have this a try then.
Intel Burn Test, New Stress Test Program
Intel Burn Test, New Stress Test Program
|
|
Sep 30 2008, 05:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
this is awesome.Gonna have this a try then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2008, 08:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Oct 9 2008, 06:05 PM) i just stress 5-10 max loops for stability test cos i will feel heart pain ive tried once too and i think i could feel the same.very2 heart pain.haha.alternatively im using prime 95 instead.it takes longer but at least the temp doesnt worry me too much.there is no need to stress so much anyways to prove absolute stability unless u wana F@H.... actaully, rather than using this software for stability test, i wud prefer using prime95 or OCCT cos its less hot n yet can do the stability job well... if u pass OCCT 1 hour, normally it wont be a problem at all for normal use already |
|
|
Oct 13 2008, 10:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Oct 12 2008, 02:42 AM) same case here...... i can OCCT pass 1 hours but only passes one loop of IBT.... okay,i was wondering does normal usage like doing 3d,photoshopping etc for example wont fail too if just running OCCT or prime/orthos for few hours?if u are not doing F@H, OCCT 1 hour cant fail u on normal usage... cos imho ibt very stressful.... n there is no need to torture ur proc to that level if absolute rock solid stability is not ur need...... |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 01:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
QUOTE(aLWAYStHEsAME @ Oct 14 2008, 05:04 PM) syahirax, ibt is the best, why not give it a try i will put that in my mind.Thanks a lot.Okay ive tried with 1/2 stressing,the temp is around 73C and i passed 5 loops.Now running at 10 loops.I cant run at maximum stress because the program will immediately crash.is it because im using windows 32 bit?(as im using 4 gb kit) This post has been edited by syahirax: Oct 15 2008, 01:27 AM |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 01:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 08:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
ive tried and it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
me too.i tried using maximum stress(full memory) but normally the program will crash.So basically i use half memory,and 8-10 loops which is okay i suppose.
|
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 04:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Oct 15 2008, 02:58 PM) I can set about 2048, a bit more actually before the program actually tells me there isn't enough memory. Different story on my x64 though. ive tried runing at 3.7 1.435 vcore and the temp jumps up until 82C. Manage to run 400x9 on 1.225v for 10 runs. But the temperature was showing 73 max on both cores at tjmax=100. ._. Seems like I'll need the CCF soon. |
|
|
Oct 15 2008, 05:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 02:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
more like hot and spicy i guess.lol
|
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 01:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
562 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: hell |
|
| Change to: | 0.0329sec
0.51
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 04:14 PM |