Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Public DOGGY DOGGY, "MANY MANY POINT LEARN"

views
     
TSderek87
post Aug 13 2008, 09:53 PM, updated 18y ago

Keep it C.L.E.A.N.
******
Senior Member
1,077 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Sabah,Sandakan Status:STUNNED


user posted image

Nothing special la.. just comment anything u want.. Shoot me... biggrin.gif
aquabib
post Aug 13 2008, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
78 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
You edited the saturation? Nice one btw.
travis_ckf
post Aug 13 2008, 09:58 PM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


Nice nice wan. Vibrant colors and sharp subject smile.gif
etsuko
post Aug 14 2008, 09:48 AM

Spaced out person
Group Icon
Elite
4,210 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malaysia


A little too tight though. I'd have personally preferred a little more breathing room.

BUt it's nice and sharp. thumbup.gif
eddychstu
post Aug 15 2008, 12:28 AM

Why so serious?
*******
Senior Member
2,347 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: in town


c'mon, show the original shot. this one you pp until over exposed edi brows.gif
TSderek87
post Aug 15 2008, 02:46 AM

Keep it C.L.E.A.N.
******
Senior Member
1,077 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Sabah,Sandakan Status:STUNNED


QUOTE(aquabib @ Aug 13 2008, 09:55 PM)
You edited the saturation? Nice one btw.
*
nope, basic adjustments only.

QUOTE(travis_ckf @ Aug 13 2008, 09:58 PM)
Nice nice wan. Vibrant colors and sharp subject smile.gif
*
tyty..

QUOTE(etsuko @ Aug 14 2008, 09:48 AM)
A little too tight though. I'd have personally preferred a little more breathing room.

BUt it's nice and sharp. thumbup.gif
*
ty... i liked it tighter.. that's why.. hahaha... i still have the one with more breathing room.

QUOTE(eddychstu @ Aug 15 2008, 12:28 AM)
c'mon, show the original shot. this one you pp until over exposed edi brows.gif
*
Over exposed? maybe ur monitor brightness too high dy... i checked with the histogram and a calibrated monitor. smile.gif

P.S. : normal basic adjustments done only, no heavy pp. what for? it's my dog only..


Actually i showed this pic got other purpose one.. tongue.gif hahaha..... see luck lor... hahaha....

BTW, there's something which get on my nerve sometimes... why do ppl always want to see original shots when they see a heavily pp picture? i mean.. what's the point? so u get to see the ori shot, and then? it's really pointless lor... tongue.gif

This post has been edited by derek87: Aug 15 2008, 02:48 AM
brandonleow
post Aug 15 2008, 02:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


nice pic~ the colour seems quite saturated tho..
eddychstu
post Aug 15 2008, 11:28 AM

Why so serious?
*******
Senior Member
2,347 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: in town


QUOTE(derek87 @ Aug 15 2008, 02:46 AM)
nope, basic adjustments only.
tyty..
ty... i liked it tighter.. that's why.. hahaha... i still have the one  with more breathing room.
Over exposed? maybe ur monitor brightness too high dy... i checked with the histogram and a calibrated monitor. smile.gif

P.S. : normal basic adjustments done only, no heavy pp. what for? it's my dog only..
Actually i showed this pic got other purpose one.. tongue.gif hahaha..... see luck lor... hahaha....

BTW, there's something which get on my nerve sometimes... why do ppl always want to see original shots when they see a heavily pp picture? i mean.. what's the point? so u get to see the ori shot, and then? it's really pointless lor...  tongue.gif
*
minor pp is okay, but this image has lost quite some details. i suppose the original shot will show more fur of the dogs instead of one patch of white spot. i hope you get what i mean.

anyway, to each their preference tongue.gif
mindkiller6610
post Aug 15 2008, 02:42 PM

IT-Motion : Your Digital Solutions
*******
Senior Member
2,477 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


alright, i think this Rita portrait photo is indeed a little bit overexposed, u have lost some fur details on white clipping. I have done some reverse-PP, i think this looks better.

user posted image

and i think it could be better, i m not good in PP..

This post has been edited by mindkiller6610: Aug 15 2008, 02:43 PM
TSderek87
post Aug 15 2008, 06:04 PM

Keep it C.L.E.A.N.
******
Senior Member
1,077 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Sabah,Sandakan Status:STUNNED


QUOTE(mindkiller6610 @ Aug 15 2008, 02:42 PM)
alright, i think this Rita portrait photo is indeed a little bit overexposed, u have lost some fur details on white clipping. I have done some reverse-PP, i think this looks better.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

and i think it could be better, i m not good in PP..
*
Anyway it's just personal preferences, the picture u redid made my dog looked dirty, as i said, personal preferences. The adjustments i made is to make my dog to look like it has soft furs, in fact she dont. tongue.gif

Details that i wanted to retain are the tongue, nose, eye, wiskers, and paws.

anway, ty for giving me opinions. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by derek87: Aug 15 2008, 06:04 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0173sec    1.12    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 10:58 PM