
Nothing special la.. just comment anything u want.. Shoot me...
Public DOGGY DOGGY, "MANY MANY POINT LEARN"
|
|
Aug 13 2008, 09:53 PM, updated 18y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,077 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Sabah,Sandakan Status:STUNNED |
![]() Nothing special la.. just comment anything u want.. Shoot me... |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2008, 09:55 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
78 posts Joined: Aug 2008 |
You edited the saturation? Nice one btw.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2008, 09:58 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong Not For Human Live One.... |
Nice nice wan. Vibrant colors and sharp subject
|
|
|
Aug 14 2008, 09:48 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
4,210 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malaysia |
A little too tight though. I'd have personally preferred a little more breathing room.
BUt it's nice and sharp. |
|
|
Aug 15 2008, 12:28 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,347 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: in town |
c'mon, show the original shot. this one you pp until over exposed edi
|
|
|
Aug 15 2008, 02:46 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,077 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Sabah,Sandakan Status:STUNNED |
QUOTE(aquabib @ Aug 13 2008, 09:55 PM) nope, basic adjustments only.QUOTE(travis_ckf @ Aug 13 2008, 09:58 PM) tyty..QUOTE(etsuko @ Aug 14 2008, 09:48 AM) A little too tight though. I'd have personally preferred a little more breathing room. ty... i liked it tighter.. that's why.. hahaha... i still have the one with more breathing room.BUt it's nice and sharp. QUOTE(eddychstu @ Aug 15 2008, 12:28 AM) Over exposed? maybe ur monitor brightness too high dy... i checked with the histogram and a calibrated monitor. P.S. : normal basic adjustments done only, no heavy pp. what for? it's my dog only.. Actually i showed this pic got other purpose one.. BTW, there's something which get on my nerve sometimes... why do ppl always want to see original shots when they see a heavily pp picture? i mean.. what's the point? so u get to see the ori shot, and then? it's really pointless lor... This post has been edited by derek87: Aug 15 2008, 02:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 15 2008, 02:59 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
67 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
nice pic~ the colour seems quite saturated tho..
|
|
|
Aug 15 2008, 11:28 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,347 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: in town |
QUOTE(derek87 @ Aug 15 2008, 02:46 AM) nope, basic adjustments only. minor pp is okay, but this image has lost quite some details. i suppose the original shot will show more fur of the dogs instead of one patch of white spot. i hope you get what i mean.tyty.. ty... i liked it tighter.. that's why.. hahaha... i still have the one with more breathing room. Over exposed? maybe ur monitor brightness too high dy... i checked with the histogram and a calibrated monitor. P.S. : normal basic adjustments done only, no heavy pp. what for? it's my dog only.. Actually i showed this pic got other purpose one.. BTW, there's something which get on my nerve sometimes... why do ppl always want to see original shots when they see a heavily pp picture? i mean.. what's the point? so u get to see the ori shot, and then? it's really pointless lor... anyway, to each their preference |
|
|
Aug 15 2008, 02:42 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,477 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
alright, i think this Rita portrait photo is indeed a little bit overexposed, u have lost some fur details on white clipping. I have done some reverse-PP, i think this looks better.
![]() and i think it could be better, i m not good in PP.. This post has been edited by mindkiller6610: Aug 15 2008, 02:43 PM |
|
|
Aug 15 2008, 06:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,077 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Sabah,Sandakan Status:STUNNED |
QUOTE(mindkiller6610 @ Aug 15 2008, 02:42 PM) alright, i think this Rita portrait photo is indeed a little bit overexposed, u have lost some fur details on white clipping. I have done some reverse-PP, i think this looks better. Anyway it's just personal preferences, the picture u redid made my dog looked dirty, as i said, personal preferences. The adjustments i made is to make my dog to look like it has soft furs, in fact she dont. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « and i think it could be better, i m not good in PP.. Details that i wanted to retain are the tongue, nose, eye, wiskers, and paws. anway, ty for giving me opinions. This post has been edited by derek87: Aug 15 2008, 06:04 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0173sec
1.12
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 10:58 PM |