QUOTE(SeeD @ Oct 16 2008, 12:08 PM)
Somebody make a comparison of the LX3 with G10 please 
I'm confused ! Both of these machines have their ups and downs ... In terms of specification.
What do you guys think of the image quality of these 2?
I also noticed nobody uses anything more than ISO 800 for any pictures. So it doesn't make any difference lah having an extra 3200 ISO in the LX3 than in the G10 ...
Sensor Question
1/1.63" bigger or 1/1.7" bigger? 1/1.63 bigger right ?
This is where it confused most consumers since manufacturers like to use such term to state the sensor size, making it all the more confusing for consumers. I'm confused ! Both of these machines have their ups and downs ... In terms of specification.
What do you guys think of the image quality of these 2?
I also noticed nobody uses anything more than ISO 800 for any pictures. So it doesn't make any difference lah having an extra 3200 ISO in the LX3 than in the G10 ...
Sensor Question
1/1.63" bigger or 1/1.7" bigger? 1/1.63 bigger right ?
The sensor size 1/1.63 on the the LX3 is a bit larger than typical 1/1.8 or 1/1.7 sensor but still way too small compared to APS-C or full frame.
In general, 1/2.5, 1/2.33. 1/1.8, 1/1.7, 1/1.63 are all tiny sensors. Roughly a 4/3 sensor is about 4 times larger than a 1/1.7" sensor, and it only does up from there (APS-C about 7 1/2 times larger, then full frame, etc.). In other words the sensor is too neglilable to be considered "big".
As for the LX3 and G10 both are very comparable, image quality wise there's really no different in image quality in most cameras these days. It all comes down to features, since both are aimed for those who want a DSLR like experince and both cams are targeted towards DSLR user looking for a compact backup.
Oct 16 2008, 12:54 PM

Quote
0.0753sec
2.09
7 queries
GZIP Disabled