squier strat vs sx copy strat..i wonder which one have a better sound and value for the money...

This post has been edited by zariqcools: Jul 16 2008, 04:00 PM

for me, i'll choose sx strat.

sx strat copy of course

I opt for SX Strat too.

to each his own?
best you try out yourself.
who knows after you purchase the SX and when you finally hold a squier, you like the neck of the latter better?

if ur comparing the squier california series with SX...
the squier has a narrower and thinner neck.

the squier also has greater QC issues...once i tried 4 different california series...only 1 was good.
the SX is better.

but when u wanna upgrade guitars later...its harder to re-sell SX cos squier carries a 'better' name...

This post has been edited by Everdying: Jul 18 2008, 12:42 AM

i wanna ask about Squier...

there are California, Affinity and Standard series rite?

how to differentiate those? i mean the feature and quality...

which 1 is better and why?

u pay for wat ur getting.

california - basswood body.
affinity - alder.
standard - agathis.

i think its still that, too lazy to check.
also the hardware gets better, which should be obvious since ur paying more.

nah if i buy sx or squier i wont re-sell it back coz i wanna make it as my guitar collection..it may contain good/bad memories..

I like the SX strat tone,but I prefer the Squier's neck better.

I used to have teles for both brands, ends up I kept the SX. To me it plays better, sounds better, definitely a keeper.

Sx strat = better value for money.

sx is the best..
give a try for it lp
also better..