for under RM3k i don't think any phone can beat it yet as for now.
Samsung Samsung INNOV8 i8510 - Symbian Slider, The killer monster phone
Samsung Samsung INNOV8 i8510 - Symbian Slider, The killer monster phone
|
|
Sep 25 2008, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
i've researched a bit about this phone again, and holy crap the photo quality is simply awesome!
for under RM3k i don't think any phone can beat it yet as for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2008, 10:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Seaedge @ Sep 25 2008, 05:47 PM) haha. but i'm still leaning towards iphone 3g than this holy crap...no money for either phone now... ...dunno my gf want the SE C905 or this, looks like the photo is even better than some digital camera using low ISO to take picture. |
|
|
Sep 29 2008, 01:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Seaedge @ Sep 29 2008, 10:01 AM) i think if it's not because of xenon flash you would have sticked to innov8 from the start already right? i think the xenon flash still score a lot although day light photos are not as good as innov8. now i'm quite interested in night photos between C905 and innov8, as far as i can see the innov8 doesn't handle night shots too good either... |
|
|
Oct 8 2008, 10:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Seaedge @ Oct 7 2008, 10:20 AM) good shots.. innov8 didnt struggle that much in night shots... but still... cant beat this cameraphone if innov8 can do iso100 and exposure at 4secs and above, i don't see why innov8 can't beat that...» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « imvho it's apple and oranges. on top of that holding camera for more than 4 secs with hand is non practical at all, what if there's no place for you to hold still your camera? |
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 01:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Seaedge @ Oct 9 2008, 01:37 AM) true it is apple and oranges comparison, but i am pointing out how they can do in night shots. holding camera for 4sec memang tak pratical, but there is already tripod for cameraphones.. but then again, N82 proves itself doing a good night shot without 4sec shutter. shud i take n82 to do comparison? oh i should check out the n82 night shots, sound interesting! i laik imobile902 camera. and that is also why i set it as my own benchmark. becoz previously i owned 902 b4. not only nightshots, but macro is awesome and i guess no other cameraphone can focus that near. but, hey, its my own benchmark. and i am evaluating innov8 to be my next cameraphone. and i hate bringing my digicam out... |
|
|
Nov 11 2008, 08:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Aishiteru^Suki @ Nov 11 2008, 02:01 PM) Me wanna ask some questions also.. to all i8510 owners, if we reduce the picture resolution, will the shutter speed reduce also?? one thing i don't like about i8510 camera is the shutter speed.. too slow for me.. hope u guys can help.. thanks.. shutter speed is shutter speed, resolution is resolution.what do you mean by, too slow for you? are you going to shoot pictures while jogging? |
| Change to: | 0.0357sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 11:14 PM |