QUOTE(Phoeni_142 @ Feb 27 2009, 11:16 AM)
Yes, indeed developers are coping hard. And it's about time they are put in this situation. They have been complacent for far too long. Some hotshot like SPSetia introduces a 5/95 concept - and our mouth is drooling. It should have been an industry norm and practice in the first place! If they don't have the proper capital strength - too bad - out they go - bankcrupt for all I care. The industry should be more darwinian and competitive.
Well, I see your point on sub-sales.....however, I actually expect sub-sales price to be flattish or slightly increasing in landed residential areas......prime areas - i think the price will actually trend upwards. In general, banks would tend to shy away from the "new to bank" market or under con market. We expect the sub-sale market to actually be more competitive as banks would want to compete in this area. Why? The quality of the collateral is good, customers in this segment may be of better credit quality, and the customers themselves may be motivated to refinance.
cheers.
yes, i always believe in landed property even though it may not be first choice for property investor...
i am of the view that the prices for landed property in coming months may be stagnant rather then slight increase due to the fear of commitment by the ppl in purchasing property. In fact, sub sale cases are reducing in Banks since Jan ..
I am currently have an offer to purchase a leasehold double storey terrace house at a slight below market price but undetermine if i shud proceed for the purchase and same time keep my existing freehold single storey ....

Added on March 4, 2009, 12:27 pmQUOTE(Pai @ Mar 4 2009, 12:04 PM)
too bad the 30% drop only applies for KLCC props.............else would have gone in bare to snap good assets at 30% off.

hi sir, for those with cash on hand, it may be good time to grab KLCC property and keep it for few years...i believe the market will bounce back by then just like 1997.
I had frens who got dirt cheap KLCC area property back in 1997 and the return was tremendous after 2000.
if only i have d $...
This post has been edited by bearbearhong: Mar 4 2009, 12:27 PM