Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
WoW Tunnels, another lower ping service, FREE
|
TSQuazacolt
|
Jul 10 2008, 08:01 AM, updated 18y ago
|
|
http://wowtunnels.com/free. nuff said. for those arent tech savvy enough for vm linux, or those that arent rich/able to pay the paid versions like lowerping/gamepath, this is for you. =edit= informed of this by guildie priest This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Jul 10 2008, 08:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
myremi
|
Jul 10 2008, 08:35 AM
|
|
Safe from keyloggers ah?
Added on July 10, 2008, 8:39 amActually, this does raise an interesting question. How come Blizzard hasn't done this already with their game servers anyway? Just improve the connection system for WoW and they might have more subscribers.
This post has been edited by myremi: Jul 10 2008, 08:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSQuazacolt
|
Jul 10 2008, 09:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(myremi @ Jul 10 2008, 08:35 AM) Safe from keyloggers ah? Added on July 10, 2008, 8:39 amActually, this does raise an interesting question. How come Blizzard hasn't done this already with their game servers anyway? Just improve the connection system for WoW and they might have more subscribers. no idea. dont forget that on oceanic, we are the minority. and with the millions of subscriber blizz has, they could really care less
|
|
|
|
|
|
orangbulu
|
Jul 10 2008, 11:24 AM
|
|
i used it, works fine, but i have gamepath anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
joeboto
|
Jul 10 2008, 04:06 PM
|
|
hmmm interesting...
Added on July 10, 2008, 4:07 pmso. orgbulu, hows the ping from this service? any dcs or spikes?
This post has been edited by joeboto: Jul 10 2008, 04:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
orangbulu
|
Jul 10 2008, 04:25 PM
|
|
no dc no spike, i get 300-350ish ping, same as what i get in gamepath.
|
|
|
|
|
|
joeboto
|
Jul 10 2008, 05:32 PM
|
|
hmm, about the same as vmware fix.
gonna try tonight for raid. will report back.
Added on July 10, 2008, 5:49 pmtried: in shattrath, 480-700ms. (quartz latency)
bottom line : ima stick to vmware.
This post has been edited by joeboto: Jul 10 2008, 05:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
samlee860407
|
Jul 10 2008, 08:26 PM
|
|
hm...whats vmware fix?
i use gamepath, but these days when raid its bad, i gona try wowtunnel and see how
|
|
|
|
|
|
Characuta
|
Jul 10 2008, 11:56 PM
|
|
Just tried it out since tdy noon.. went quite similar to gamepath.. got about 400ish and up to 500ms during 7-10pm and after that about 300ish. Now standing at about 250ms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bazet
|
Jul 11 2008, 03:20 PM
|
|
normalli i got 600..now sitting at 250-300
|
|
|
|
|
|
khelben
|
Jul 17 2008, 06:36 AM
|
|
Its actually quite good. But a lot less effective in instances though. Any sort of instance. Arenas, BGs, 25-man, 5-man etc. 250-350ms down from usual 500-600.
Not sure whether I should risk playing WoW with tunneling services like this lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madgeiser
|
Jul 17 2008, 09:32 AM
|
|
I am personally using VMWARE fix, so far so good no complaint. Not going to try out any other SSL Tunneling and risk getting banned. For single core processor user, VMWARE fix can slow down your pc a little. For multi core users, i don't think you will notice any performance issue, due to multi core processor is great at handling multi tasking.
My ping nowdays ranges from 170ms-350ms. Which is much much better from my previous ping which starts from 300ms-900ms. It still very much depend on your line quality. If you get a crappy connection, don't expect a good latency. The 218 ip can usually stay around 200ms-350ms for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSQuazacolt
|
Jul 17 2008, 11:02 AM
|
|
QUOTE(khelben @ Jul 17 2008, 06:36 AM) Its actually quite good. But a lot less effective in instances though. Any sort of instance. Arenas, BGs, 25-man, 5-man etc. 250-350ms down from usual 500-600. Not sure whether I should risk playing WoW with tunneling services like this lol. ive got reports by people that uses this experiencing WORSE ping during arenas/BG so no idea heh Added on July 17, 2008, 11:09 amQUOTE(Madgeiser @ Jul 17 2008, 09:32 AM) I am personally using VMWARE fix, so far so good no complaint. Not going to try out any other SSL Tunneling and risk getting banned. For single core processor user, VMWARE fix can slow down your pc a little. For multi core users, i don't think you will notice any performance issue, due to multi core processor is great at handling multi tasking. My ping nowdays ranges from 170ms-350ms. Which is much much better from my previous ping which starts from 300ms-900ms. It still very much depend on your line quality. If you get a crappy connection, don't expect a good latency. The 218 ip can usually stay around 200ms-350ms for me. using vmware fix myself, and had been a keen supporter of that fix as it is more "thorough" than the registry fix, no risk involved compared to the tunneling services that does alter ur IP or having an additional fee attached to it. This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Jul 17 2008, 11:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madgeiser
|
Jul 17 2008, 01:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jul 17 2008, 11:02 AM) using vmware fix myself, and had been a keen supporter of that fix as it is more "thorough" than the registry fix, no risk involved compared to the tunneling services that does alter ur IP or having an additional fee attached to it. I am starting to think, Linux is better programmed to handle TCP traffic than windows box. Else, there is no way i can justify why routing traffic thru a VMWare Linux box, has such a significant boost in ping times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSQuazacolt
|
Jul 17 2008, 03:11 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Madgeiser @ Jul 17 2008, 01:23 PM) I am starting to think, Linux is better programmed to handle TCP traffic than windows box. Else, there is no way i can justify why routing traffic thru a VMWare Linux box, has such a significant boost in ping times. its doable in windows too via registry tweaks. cept i dont want my other programs (eg: torrents/downloads) to be affected by it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
radkliler
|
Jul 17 2008, 06:05 PM
|
|
Dammit....can't boot WoW.exe using freecap
|
|
|
|
|
|
ray123
|
Jul 19 2008, 01:25 PM
|
|
Doesn't seem to work for me. Stuck at Authenticating and for some reason while Freecap / Putty is active I can't browse any websites at all.
|
|
|
|
|