Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Grand Livina VS Toyota Rush, vote 4 family car of the year below 100k

views
     
BeastX
post Jul 5 2008, 10:48 AM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


Without 4x4 AWD, Rush is just an "expensive/overpriced SUV looking Advanza".

Get the Nautica (the cheapest taxed/duty CBU)... for "the real Rush" if you do not need a 7 seater.
BeastX
post Mar 30 2011, 05:11 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,766 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(dlareg81 @ Mar 30 2011, 04:59 PM)
When ur driving 4x4 isnt the road tax higher? don't think so it's a pro. Plus Road tax for SUV is cheaper in Sabah than Peninsula by almost 50%. Dun think 4X4 would sell better.

Higher cars have low center gravity would be Einsteinly correct however, not everyone drives for F1 right. I find taller cars gives better visibility.

I would say Rush is worth the price in terms of resale value. Cheap? Not really. Best value? well it's one of the lower price competitive SUV in the market. For price conscious drivers who wants an SUV exterior, be it 4x4 or 4x2, the only next affordably price standing is KIA Sportage Facelift - RM112k.

If it's 4x4, imagine what would Rush Price be? Would users get fickled minded as to do they really need 4x4 performance while cruising tinned congested highway between Midvalley and KLCC? The whole debate of value vs price starts back from square 1.
Road tax is based on engine size.................... Road tax is cheaper in Sabah at up to 80% or more depending on cc.... Nautica/Alza/Rush/Honda City..... all paying the same road tax

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0358sec    0.36    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 04:45 PM