Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Grand Livina VS Toyota Rush, vote 4 family car of the year below 100k

views
     
DarkNite
post Sep 7 2009, 10:18 AM

ФĻĐ ИΞШB!Ξ
********
All Stars
11,040 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Deja Vu @ Sep 7 2009, 09:30 AM)
Chosen candidate:
Grand Livina

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*

So how much is a Grand Lavina? Grand Lavina 1.6 or 1.8 cc?

dlareg81
post Mar 30 2011, 04:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(b48753 @ Jul 19 2008, 01:33 PM)
I don't see any reason to buy Rush with that kind of body structure. If Rush is equpped wit 4X4 then it's worth of it.

Remember overall height affects the car handlings, and also comfort of passanger inside..higher cars has low center gravity..
*
When ur driving 4x4 isnt the road tax higher? don't think so it's a pro. Plus Road tax for SUV is cheaper in Sabah than Peninsula by almost 50%. Dun think 4X4 would sell better.

Higher cars have low center gravity would be Einsteinly correct however, not everyone drives for F1 right. I find taller cars gives better visibility.

I would say Rush is worth the price in terms of resale value. Cheap? Not really. Best value? well it's one of the lower price competitive SUV in the market. For price conscious drivers who wants an SUV exterior, be it 4x4 or 4x2, the only next affordably price standing is KIA Sportage Facelift - RM112k.

If it's 4x4, imagine what would Rush Price be? Would users get fickled minded as to do they really need 4x4 performance while cruising tinned congested highway between Midvalley and KLCC? The whole debate of value vs price starts back from square 1.

BeastX
post Mar 30 2011, 05:11 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,770 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(dlareg81 @ Mar 30 2011, 04:59 PM)
When ur driving 4x4 isnt the road tax higher? don't think so it's a pro. Plus Road tax for SUV is cheaper in Sabah than Peninsula by almost 50%. Dun think 4X4 would sell better.

Higher cars have low center gravity would be Einsteinly correct however, not everyone drives for F1 right. I find taller cars gives better visibility.

I would say Rush is worth the price in terms of resale value. Cheap? Not really. Best value? well it's one of the lower price competitive SUV in the market. For price conscious drivers who wants an SUV exterior, be it 4x4 or 4x2, the only next affordably price standing is KIA Sportage Facelift - RM112k.

If it's 4x4, imagine what would Rush Price be? Would users get fickled minded as to do they really need 4x4 performance while cruising tinned congested highway between Midvalley and KLCC? The whole debate of value vs price starts back from square 1.
Road tax is based on engine size.................... Road tax is cheaper in Sabah at up to 80% or more depending on cc.... Nautica/Alza/Rush/Honda City..... all paying the same road tax
kapultek
post Mar 30 2011, 05:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,376 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Rush driving is like a truck
turbocharged
post Mar 30 2011, 05:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(dlareg81 @ Mar 30 2011, 04:59 PM)
When ur driving 4x4 isnt the road tax higher? don't think so it's a pro. Plus Road tax for SUV is cheaper in Sabah than Peninsula by almost 50%. Dun think 4X4 would sell better.

Higher cars have low center gravity would be Einsteinly correct however, not everyone drives for F1 right. I find taller cars gives better visibility.


*
no Mr. Einstein, the visibility is based on the seat. myvi sitting way way higher than wira, due to the seat design. Not becos it has taller roof.



3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0378sec    0.19    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 02:14 PM