Well I got my Tuniq TX-2 and reapplied the thermal compound. Still sad

I could post screencaps of the heat but instead of wasting lyn bandwidth I'll waste google's and you can see them here: http://ig33ku.blogspot.com/

Running auto tune. Still unfinished but core 690mhz n ram 1093

Ok to set my placing in the list:

Powercolor 4850




Attached thumbnail(s)

Once the card gets artifact u better scale it down

u guys better get the warranty rdy cuz here i come.

ben3003, beta drivers u know.. anyway oepra 8.5 with 100 windows have memory leak.... crashes my xp

I also setted at 50%. Now getting 59C-60C at idle. From 81C at idle.

I wonder how much space the S1 with its addon turbo fans would take..

S1 has it's own fan addon which r slim.

Unfortunately, such a hard loss for Nvidia is not the same as ATI since ATI is with AMD they can take hard losses n laugh. Nvidia does not have the capital to take a driect crashing blow.

So if the 4000 series does do this u can kiss Nvidia goodbye unless they have more IPs to get investors to life support them.

Metal Fatique? I love that game.. 'what is ur's is mine. What's mine is ur's!' lol

My red robots will beat up ur blue (green) ones!!!

hahah that's kinda funny considering this thread topic

To add to sites with unreliable reviews is Tom's and Anand.

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/new...hoop-ass-itself <-- if it is true... it maybe soon before nVidia needs a massive investor infuse if not they r dead. They r not like AMD which if u really look at who can sustain loses for yrs n still get investors to join them.

Anand and Tom were friends before they argued about money and Anand left to creat his own site.

Tom's reviews suck. Its plain and simple. I know from experience. Hell here a screenshot of such suspect article:





Give me one good reason why u must use hoax as a tag for the picture?

As for Anand, I actually stuck with them when they broke off to start their site until I read one editorial where he was blasting AMD as being a lousy company making CPUs because they refuse to bend on their policy of never sending out free review samples. That to me equals a big F U.

When the creator of a site sayz that if he doesnt get stuff free n must buy it himself then the company that makes the product is crap n so is the product then u got serious ethical issues there.

Therefore any benchmarks r suspect. N yes u can camouflage ur unethical behaviour by making 80% accurate articles n sqeezing in the 20% inaccurate articles.

The temp meter and readout now seem to work for me