QUOTE(Slowpoke @ Jul 21 2008, 07:48 PM)
Well, you said it yourself.
- If you can memorise the theory and can't apply it,
- If you can't read a simple story and understand it inside 3 hours (unfair?)
- If you can't put your knowledge down on paper effectively
I thought you say:- If you can memorise the theory and can't apply it,
- If you can't read a simple story and understand it inside 3 hours (unfair?)
- If you can't put your knowledge down on paper effectively
QUOTE
When exam just dish out some random reasoning and hope it makes sense. Just think, you need just 50% of the marks for an exam to pass, that's like answering one question wrong for every one you answer right. At most you have to study for the financial accounting papers, F7 and P2. The rest is mostly 40% logic, 20% guesswork and some good writing.
So your 40% Logic, 20% Guesswork and some good writing skills now requires some application knowledge, memorising skill, read the whole stories in less than 3 hours and put your knowledge on paper effectively?
I thought you said it's blardy easy?
QUOTE
...your studying is fail and you should rightfully fail. Come on, how hard is it to wrap your head around some concepts with real life examples? Sure I concede that for technical papers such as tax and finance you need to hit the books, but it's no different than trying to memorise what the sultan-sultan melaka did back in form 2. If ask you to explain a bit also cannot, yet you can pass an engineering or programming paper beautifully, it's obvious your talent lies in that direction.
Because technical papers are nothing much like sultan sultan melaka where they've dead and they won't change unlike our exam.
QUOTE
And as for your friend, I think she wouldn't want herself to pass as well. Can you imagine what the standard of acca will be like, if you can't even satisfy the minimum requirements and can still pass? Now that would be really unfair to you and me. If she has problems reading stories in english, perhaps she should work on her reading comprehension, or practise her writing and thinking by doing more past year papers. I don't see why the 3 hour limit is a problem, she has taken 10+ papers until P3 and should be used to the exact same conditions as all the previous papers. Do you think you will have 3 hours to read a one-page document at work?
I thought you said
QUOTE
Are you crazy? ACCA is one of the easiest professional courses in the world. Just need to sit there and shake leg when the lecturer teach, then go home forget everything is normal. When exam just dish out some random reasoning and hope it makes sense. Just think, you need just 50% of the marks for an exam to pass, that's like answering one question wrong for every one you answer right. At most you have to study for the financial accounting papers, F7 and P2. The rest is mostly 40% logic, 20% guesswork and some good writing. Once i saw an entire 50 mark 3.3 question that even a high school student could answer perfectly.
Therefore, I rest my case.
Jul 22 2008, 12:26 AM
Quote
0.0498sec
0.48
7 queries
GZIP Disabled