Oct 28 2008, 05:08 PM
QUOTE(Topace111 @ Oct 27 2008, 01:37 PM)
I am thinking of chin ann already since i have followed his tax in lower levels b4 (something like reporting & tax needs to follow same lecturer for better synergy). I have realised in my P2 that my lecturer touches very little on his F7 standards which is still relevant for P2 (Ie : leases & PPE)
Since i have followed his f7 class i don't have much worries but i don't think other students feel the same way (some from different lecturer background or they have skip P2 for one sitting). This also happens in my P1 where the lecturer cover less in detail in his audit area.
So far in my revision I have uncovered some normal concepts : (just to share only
)
P1 : 4 main area (which majority touches on CG). Lecturer not confident to spot since last sitting the trend blows off. Apart from CG everything can use self reasoning (ethics ). Even CG has duplication of contents especially if you touch on roles (aud comm, nomination comm, chairman....etc) The only part i am worried is abou professinal marks for answer structure (How to prepare a memo or official letter already ?
)
P2 : better still if you know haneef he will spot everything (especially last sitting touches more on standards than consol). According to him the examiner for P2 favours reasoning rather than mathematical adjustments (still important but lesser extent). Therefore i will never expect my a/c to balance like last sitting also
. My foundation is strong but i cannot use fast techniques / shortcuts to calculate. So far question is not that tough yet but i need to build in my speed. I heard many people forced to resit since the paper is now more theory based than calculational.
I am not trying to brag here but after constant & barrage of knowledge imparted by haneef, i feels BPP theory question are not that difficult.
P3 : everyone said its huge but i beg to differ. Yeah its quite heavy if you read everything. If i summarise into key words its not that large you just need some reasoning & elaboration skills. Even the the key words are self explanatory. Maybe the IT part needs some attention. I can remember & understand the content of P3 well but authors name are quite hard to digest (Malekzadeh & Navahandi anyone) I can calculte over >100 authors.
tis sitting world prize winner should be u Since i have followed his f7 class i don't have much worries but i don't think other students feel the same way (some from different lecturer background or they have skip P2 for one sitting). This also happens in my P1 where the lecturer cover less in detail in his audit area.
So far in my revision I have uncovered some normal concepts : (just to share only
)P1 : 4 main area (which majority touches on CG). Lecturer not confident to spot since last sitting the trend blows off. Apart from CG everything can use self reasoning (ethics ). Even CG has duplication of contents especially if you touch on roles (aud comm, nomination comm, chairman....etc) The only part i am worried is abou professinal marks for answer structure (How to prepare a memo or official letter already ?
)P2 : better still if you know haneef he will spot everything (especially last sitting touches more on standards than consol). According to him the examiner for P2 favours reasoning rather than mathematical adjustments (still important but lesser extent). Therefore i will never expect my a/c to balance like last sitting also
. My foundation is strong but i cannot use fast techniques / shortcuts to calculate. So far question is not that tough yet but i need to build in my speed. I heard many people forced to resit since the paper is now more theory based than calculational.I am not trying to brag here but after constant & barrage of knowledge imparted by haneef, i feels BPP theory question are not that difficult.
P3 : everyone said its huge but i beg to differ. Yeah its quite heavy if you read everything. If i summarise into key words its not that large you just need some reasoning & elaboration skills. Even the the key words are self explanatory. Maybe the IT part needs some attention. I can remember & understand the content of P3 well but authors name are quite hard to digest (Malekzadeh & Navahandi anyone) I can calculte over >100 authors.
Quote
0.0613sec
0.48
7 queries
GZIP Disabled