Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ACCA (V4), Accountants

views
     
allornothing
post Jun 28 2008, 02:54 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


You can take T10 in Sunway actually. But this will take some effort. I have classmates switching from T8 to T10 after the first few weeks. It certainly raised their chances of passing CAT.

On the other hand I also know some who continue with T8 and failed. They are now taking T10 but 6 months wasted. Basically T8 is an OPTION, you can choose not to take it.

It just might take some effort of explaining to them why you don't want to take audit.
allornothing
post Aug 18 2008, 01:39 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


66 yeah partly true, but only if your OBU project achieves the highest grade I think. Most probably an A. For unconditional first class, you will need an average of 68 marks, then as long as you pass the OBU you'll still get first class
allornothing
post Aug 18 2008, 01:59 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(ellimist @ Aug 18 2008, 01:51 PM)
Oh ok,never knew that. Is this part of the syllabus change in OBU or something?
*
I guess so, since it's the first time I heard of it. I was told it was 66 all the while too, until 2 months ago. And if I recall, there was a change in the OBU thingy, so maybe this is part of it
allornothing
post Aug 18 2008, 02:18 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(ellimist @ Aug 18 2008, 02:10 PM)
Personally I recommend against it (P4),the examiner has seemed to set some pretty difficult stuff. Rather demoralizing paper to sit for imo laugh.gif
But I suppose they lower the graph when it's an insane paper,so by all means take it tongue.gif
*
I'm pretty sure the same happened to F5, as everyone in the exam hall exited demoralized. Many never finished, some had no idea what one full question wanted (25 marks there). What a way to replace 2.1 hehe.
allornothing
post Aug 18 2008, 04:21 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


That 2 and a half questions that you did probably got you very high marks. In T5 either you know very well or you don't know at all
allornothing
post Aug 18 2008, 04:28 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(dOuBLeJ @ Aug 18 2008, 04:25 PM)
well,i craps alot in my Q3(leadership) coz my lec miss wong siew choo never teach us tat leadership style at all!
lol, honestly all also i goreng..
i duno how i passed also..
i calculated myself b4 the results out.
n i tot i am gonna get 15 marks like tat only or less than 2 digits..
*
Ah true. Some of the things inside is common sense as well. Congrats smile.gif
allornothing
post Aug 20 2008, 03:44 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(dreamerJD @ Aug 19 2008, 11:15 PM)
Anyone who took F7 last sitting under Haneef kind enough to borrow the notes for me to photocopy? Especially on the standards part. The lecturer i'm under currently teaches based on examples & there's no explanation of the theory in the notes, so i find it a bit hard to study. I think it's better to read on the theory of the standard & then only move on to the examples depicting the standard. Pls PM me  icon_question.gif
*
Who's the lecturer? I'm really curious
allornothing
post Aug 20 2008, 09:11 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(dreamerJD @ Aug 20 2008, 04:24 PM)
haha.. I guess u'll have to continue being curious  tongue.gif  Every lec has his/her own style of teaching. I'm not saying he/she is not a good lec, just that it don't suit my study style. Better not start naming & ruin the lec's reputation yeah?

Again, any ex-Haneef students or current Haneef students don't mind helping me?  pls pls notworthy.gif
*
I get it. It's okay. But I do have a hunch though. Was just wondering whether I was the only one who thought that way. smile.gif
allornothing
post Aug 20 2008, 10:46 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


Ugh. Very low pass rates. No wonder I only got marginal passes for F5 and F7. Thankful though..

I'm sure it was Question 3 in F5 that killed most candidates. As for F7 I believe it's Question 2. Not that it has never been, but it just came out in a different manner

Updated : That means in the new syllabus, F8 isn't the only paper that can potentially drag you to a halt in Part 2, thanks to F5. 2.1 was so much better..

This post has been edited by allornothing: Aug 20 2008, 10:51 PM
allornothing
post Aug 21 2008, 10:00 AM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


Agreed. My Q2 in F7 was my last question, and with just 30 minutes left and faced with a rare style of asking, I honestly started to panic. Tried adjusting for every note that I can understand.

I wonder if, with the significantly lower pass rate esp F5, is the whole course getting tougher, and that they are trying to pass as little as they can
allornothing
post Sep 1 2008, 04:37 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


I would concentrate on theory questions as well and not just depend on calculations to pass. Remember that this is not F2 so the requirements would be different. Understand what you study, so that no matter how the question is twisted, you would still know how to start
allornothing
post Sep 25 2008, 04:29 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(stephanie0721 @ Sep 23 2008, 01:14 PM)
thx Topace & Rvelos =) ur replies r really helpful =)
as now i m doing F1-F4 now and wil b sitting for exam in Dec..
so i start wondering, how many papers shud i take for next sem? which lecturer to follow?...stuffs like tat...
my coursemates hav been discussing on this issues too..
wil it b too tough to take 4 papers in 1 sitting..say F5-F8 ?
since sum of the papers like taxation and audit are the 1st time i approach them..
so..any advice for me?
thx =)
*
I did 4 last semester. And also doing 4 this semester. But then again I felt comfortable because I've done CAT, so I had some knowledge on tax and audit. It is possible, but then be prepared for lots of hard work. For a period of time, I had 7 days classes, which was horrible.

I have no idea why this " max paper" culture exists among us. I'm sure degree students take things on a normal time frame, enjoying their 3 months break. The nature of the course, perhaps?

As for me,I have my own goals nod.gif

allornothing
post Oct 11 2008, 08:53 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


I'm relying on Mr Goh for my P7 next semester, since I'm at Sunway. But lecturers tend to discourage us from taking this paper and instead ask us to choose P4,P5 or even P6.
allornothing
post Nov 4 2008, 11:55 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(karhoe @ Nov 4 2008, 11:12 PM)
Guys i'm currently studying CAT at sunway

My marks have been quite good in CAT, right now im preparing for CAT T6 T7 T8 T9 this coming December.

I do not know if I should take up 4 papers next Sem (F4 F5 F6 F9) or three papers (F4 F5 F6)

I believe I have quite good fundamental in CAT, I think I won't have a problem taking extra subject F9 next semester, but would you guys brief me a little about it?

I'm only more concerned about second and third semeseter where I would be taking (F7 F8 P1 P3) and the remaining three P papers in the last semester.

Any suggestion or comments anyone?
*
Heya. I took 4 papers in the early Fundamental papers, and now I'm taking a combination of Fundamental and Professional papers which also adds up to 4 papers.

Prior to that I was a CAT student. As long as you're not the student who scores relatively low in CAT you should be fine. A good basic in CAT will help tremendously in Fundamental level.

I would support taking 4 papers especially F4,F5,F6,F9 as it gives you flexibility later on. If you find that you can keep up with it, continue taking F7,F8,P1,P3 and if not, just take 3 papers. Unlike F8, you don't really need to have prior knowledge for F9 to be able to understand better.

allornothing
post Nov 13 2008, 12:22 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


QUOTE(karhoe @ Nov 12 2008, 11:49 PM)
Guys, I plan to take 4 papers next semester and the subsequent 2 semesters.

Something like F4 F5 F6 F9 followed by F7 F8 P1 P3 and the remaining 3 papers at the last semester.

I am also aiming to get 69+ average for F4 to F9 to qualify for first class hons for the oxford brookes degree program, is it something impossible to be done?

Can anyone tell me more about P1 and P3, how to be able to score in those papers?

Thanks
*
You've posted this before. Anyway, a good student like you will most likely get through F4,F5,F6,F9. I really suggest to take 4 papers to keep your options open later on. Otherwise taking 3,4,4 combination would be more taxing than your planned 4,4,3.

Use F4,F6 and F7 to push up your average.

Professional papers like P1 and P3 have different approach. Less retention and recall of knowledge. Calculation too is less emphasized. You actually sort of study less but you learn to use your mind more.

This post has been edited by allornothing: Nov 13 2008, 12:24 PM
allornothing
post Nov 19 2008, 06:47 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


F7 and P2 exams dates are the same. I think Raymond's combo would be nice. Or else you would be left with what I did, F4,F5,F6,F7 and then F8,F9,P1,P2

It's pretty safe if you follow the sequence
allornothing
post Jan 17 2009, 10:29 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


Very true. Deloitte and EY are front runners in Tax in malaysia

This post has been edited by allornothing: Jan 17 2009, 10:29 PM
allornothing
post Feb 16 2009, 02:42 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


Try to audit the F8 exam questions and see how it is answered. It helps since answering the question needs to be in a specific manner. Keywords like Obtain, Trace, Cast play a big role. Make sure you understand the answer on why is it like that? To check what? Because sometimes you need a reason for a procedure which exam asked before.

I expected only a pass for audit (naturally) and got 55. Would really hate to do it again

PS: My prior knowledge in audit during my CAT days helped my understanding tremendously

This post has been edited by allornothing: Feb 16 2009, 02:43 PM
allornothing
post Feb 16 2009, 08:51 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


Yea it's comparatively easier for F8. But then as usual they screw up the passing rates, and those who would do okay would now find themselves in the 40-49 region.

I bet those who fail are in that range
allornothing
post Feb 16 2009, 09:30 PM

Melancholic //
*****
Senior Member
926 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia


Apparently a few people in this forum would recommend Low Chin Ann of Kolej Bandar. I can't comment much since I was never under him.

But if you've tried every other lecturer, maybe he can help smile.gif

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0471sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 07:56 AM