HP LP2475w 24-inch Widescreen LCD Monitor

http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/my/en/sm/WF...67-3648442.html
Price RM$ 3,056
H-IPS/S-IPS and even S-PVA are way better then TN panels. It's like comparing gold with a piece of shit
QUOTE
Originally Posted by rmbag Hard|Forum
Here's how I tested input lag. I connected my PC to the LP2475w and my old Iiyama 19" CRT in clone mode and ran the input lag test from lagom.
I took a series of 20 shots in burst mode with my digital camera with 1/320 shutter speed. Both tests have the LP2475w over DVI and the Iiyama 19" over VGA. Graphicscard is an Asus NVidia 7800GT. From previous input lag tests I know that results are consistent when I switch ports on the graphiccard.
I ran two test with the same parameters.
Test 1: The HP is on average 18,7 ms behind the Iiyama CRT.
Difference in ms per photo taken:
15, 16, 0, 16, 31, 15, 0, 31, 31, 16, 32, 31, 16, 16, 15, 31, 16, 15, 16, 15
Test 2: The HP is on average 21,5 ms behind the Iiyama CRT.
Difference in ms per photo taken:
0, 16, 32, 32, 31, 15, 31, 16, 16, 15, 47, 15, 16, 31, 16, 16

Things you should know about this monitor.Here's how I tested input lag. I connected my PC to the LP2475w and my old Iiyama 19" CRT in clone mode and ran the input lag test from lagom.
I took a series of 20 shots in burst mode with my digital camera with 1/320 shutter speed. Both tests have the LP2475w over DVI and the Iiyama 19" over VGA. Graphicscard is an Asus NVidia 7800GT. From previous input lag tests I know that results are consistent when I switch ports on the graphiccard.
I ran two test with the same parameters.
Test 1: The HP is on average 18,7 ms behind the Iiyama CRT.
Difference in ms per photo taken:
15, 16, 0, 16, 31, 15, 0, 31, 31, 16, 32, 31, 16, 16, 15, 31, 16, 15, 16, 15
Test 2: The HP is on average 21,5 ms behind the Iiyama CRT.
Difference in ms per photo taken:
0, 16, 32, 32, 31, 15, 31, 16, 16, 15, 47, 15, 16, 31, 16, 16

1. it's a 8 bit s-ips panel.
2. it does not have a at-w polarizer
3. it's wide gamut
4. there is no hardware internal lut. You will need to depend on graphics card lut if you plan on color calibrating
5. it's using the newest panel type by Lg
QUOTE
Paneltype: LPL LM240WU4; a LG. Philips S-IPS panel model that went into production in 2008
6. it has dvi, hdmi, and display port and HDCP compliant. This is why i said i said overall it's a better alternative then Dell.
Anyway the only problem i could find for this monitor is that it is wide gamut. So colors would be over saturated on srgb sources which means pretty much everything since 90% of the graphics is using srgb
More info about the hp you can find here
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthrea...14#post12356614
This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Aug 27 2008, 01:59 AM
Aug 27 2008, 01:49 AM
Quote

0.0533sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled