I hope it going to be an epic movie just like the Dark Knight
Movies Quantum of Solace: 007 (November 6th, 2008), Craig: The Dark Knight Success of Bond
Movies Quantum of Solace: 007 (November 6th, 2008), Craig: The Dark Knight Success of Bond
|
|
Nov 3 2008, 07:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
I hope it going to be an epic movie just like the Dark Knight
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2008, 11:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
I extremely like this movie.
It is entertaining and it full of action-packed. About the gadget part, i can live without it....it is not like I extremely fond with gadget in the previous bond series in the first place. Nowadays, I kinda like semi-realistic movie...I wonder why... |
|
|
Nov 10 2008, 08:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Hmmmmm...why is everyone thinking that a true Bond Movie should associate more with the gadgets ?
I always thought bond series is suppose to be about spying and infiltrate.. |
|
|
Nov 10 2008, 12:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(jehutyz @ Nov 10 2008, 09:08 AM) I thought the bond in this movie is pretty good in finding clue and tracking his enemy location and plan..If that isnt about spying and infiltrate or gather information, I dont know what it is ... |
|
|
Nov 11 2008, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Casino Royal's villain look evil? So, for the god sake, he even didnt have epic fight against Bond.
Greene > Casino Royal Villain. Yeah, sure that Casino Royal villain did challenge the Bond's manhood but is that really satisfying to you? and again, the new bond series > previous bond movie IMO. You dont need gadget to become a 1337 agent. |
|
|
Nov 12 2008, 08:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(QuickFire @ Nov 12 2008, 12:48 AM) You call Bond's fight with Greene 'epic'? Le Chiffe and Greene are, in essence, evil businessmen. They aren't supposed to be in a fist fight with anyone weighing more than a 12-year old prepubescent kid! If you asking me, Greene play his role better. Isnt that Greene was an Environmentalist in this movie..I mean, you dont expect he go around and doing the evil look and hoping for the donation and support from everyone? and Greene's plan isnt that innocent as well. It affect a whole country and people.vil⋅lain /ˈvɪlən/ [vil-uhn] –noun 1. a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; scoundrel. I dont see "good in fist fights" anywhere. No where does it say a villain is good only if he's good in fist fights. Greene should have had his butt whipped within 5 seconds in his melee with bond. Le Chiffe was just a lot more like a slimy basterd. Greene on the other hand is no more than some middleman Bond (indirectly) kills in pursuit of higher goals. Le Chiffe sure look cool by crying blood but hey, is it a bit sissy for a villain for crying every 2 seconds? and if I not mistaken, he also begging for his life and hand to some black...Wow..That sure sinister..and not to mention, he actually got off-screen by a fodder. I just cant take this guy seriously. At least Greene is given few minute to have axe-fight with Bond. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2008, 11:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(snal @ Nov 14 2008, 07:57 AM) if you give this 8/10, i can conclude that you have never seen all the bond movies.... I watched most of the bond movie and I still disagree with you...I wonder why?because if you have seen all the bond movies, this movies doesn't even pass 4.5 on the scale of 1-10. he he |
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 12:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(snal @ Nov 15 2008, 10:11 AM) the answer is because you've seen only "most" and not "all" and when I said "most", it covered at least 80% of the most bond movie i ever watched, if 80% of the old bond movie cant make me to to root for the previous older bond movie, i seriously doubt another 20% would make any different.i've seen all.... and trust me, qos is way below par, new formula or not.... granted, that the basis story is that in casino royal and qos, bond has just been promoted to 00 status but that's no excuse to chop everything good and tested from the old formula.... with gadgets or not, bond is supposed to be a cool-headed spy, not goes around flashing his license to kill and what is with this stand-on-her-own bond-girl... it makes to the story too crowded... however, what i like is the meeting scene of the baddies... that's newand original... no meeting room, no round table... i don't recommend people to watch this movie, unless for people like me who have seen all bond movies and wishes to keep track of the bond-world development... hopefully for a better bond the next time around... and i dont really trust your so-called opinion..and you obviously didnt watch the movie in the right way, right? The entire movie why Bond was acting reckless and rage mode because he was burning and blinded by anger....but in the end, he finally found the answer that he was searching for....I mean, he is human afterall..It is normal for human always have the conflict with their own emotion. and again, if this movie failed so hard, there wont be another sequel or continuation, right but guess what? there is another 3rd coming...I guess the writer of the new bond really want piss all the former bond fanboy so badly. Am I right? Am I right? This post has been edited by kding2: Nov 15 2008, 12:50 PM |
|
|
Nov 16 2008, 11:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,007 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(maximus85 @ Nov 16 2008, 06:10 PM) the only reason why its still earning big buck is becoz of the branding itself.... It seem you are missing something here, this Casino Royale and QoS is about James Bond early life as 007. The VULNERABLE 007. The INEXPERIENCE 007why would i go for a Bond movie if i only want an action movie?? think about that to those who keep saying this is how Bond is suppose to be.. they are suppose to be secret agent doing the unseen tasks... not soldier out there blasting his way on everything he encounter to me.. the real Bond is suppose to have hot chicks, sex scene, gadgets, solving problem INTELLIGENTLY (not that don't give a fark kind of attitude), and also epic car scene.... if i wanna have super crazy action movie... i rather rewatch Bruce Willis movie.... triple pawn this lousy Craig any farking time.... All those 007 that you used to watch was a final refined product of 007. It is really beyond me that you guys for not notice this. It seem most of you guys who self-pro claimed as Bond fanboys only know about sex scene, gadget, sex scene, gadget... and just in case, Bond in QoS did use his intelligence to find the clue and solve the problem. His quick thinking did save his few times...and about his unseen tasks, how he suppose to hide his identity when the evil gigantic organization seem know everything about him? |
| Change to: | 0.0295sec
0.34
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 03:29 AM |