Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Discussion Football teams without strikers, 4-6-0's

views
     
verx
post Jun 12 2008, 08:31 PM

Soshified Madridista
Group Icon
Elite
3,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


If there's one reason why I have a dislike for formations it's because of this. Numbers like 4-4-2 or 4-6-0 never tell the whole story. It's a very simplistic form to represent a tactic. Even when u say 4-6-0 doesn't mean that there are no strikers/forwards. They just rotate among themselves.

But I believe that the forward position is still one of the most if not the most important position in football. You still need a reference up front to play off. Whether that reference is a central old fashioned striker or a forward that drifts to the flanks it doesn't matter.
verx
post Jun 12 2008, 09:26 PM

Soshified Madridista
Group Icon
Elite
3,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(+Newbie+ @ Jun 12 2008, 08:56 PM)
I realised this when Man Utd sold Beckham. Solsjaer, Scholes and Giggs playing in a system with 3 forwards rotating and playing off RvN. One moment, Solsjaer was a winger, the next, he was creeping in and poaching off loose balls. I realised then that this would be hard for RvN to fit in as he didn't have the fluidity that this system demanded. So when RvN left, I was sad, but I new it was to both sides benefit. Saha had the mobility and was more fluid in blending in with the other forwards.
*
If you've watched the way RVN has played with Madrid you'll realise how wrong that statement is. RVN's ability was never fully exploited at Man Utd. At that time Fergie's tactics were rigid and he just stuck him right up top. It's why almost all his goals for MU were from inside the box. With Madrid he's given more freedom. RVN is deceptively agile and his technique is better than what most ppl in England give him credit for. It's why he's so good at leading the line. If he were playing for Man Utd now he would still have fitted in perfectly and you guys would have been more complete as a team. If you watched his recent performance for Holland carefully where they use a similar free 4-2-3-1 system you can clearly see what u guys are missing out on.
verx
post Jun 13 2008, 11:37 AM

Soshified Madridista
Group Icon
Elite
3,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(EmperorMeng @ Jun 13 2008, 11:20 AM)
yes i agree, the future is players who are all-rounders.
*
I just don't see this happening. No matter how hard u train players, some will always be better at others at different aspects of the game. The only thing that is universal is the fitness levels. Modern football now places more emphasis on the ability to cover more ground.

QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jun 13 2008, 11:29 AM)
Call me old school but I still like the idea of having out-and-out strikers in my team. It will at least give me options off the bench as a manager. On a positive note, long balls will be used less as there isn't a target man up-front to aim for. The ball will stay on the deck more and teams will have to make brilliant runs and execute pin-point passes to open up defences. Did anyone see Iniesta's through pass to Villa against Russia?

If the trend continues, will there still be a place for big lumbering forwards in the game (i.e. Crouch, Toni & Koller) or will they all have to play either as defensive midfielders (i.e. Engelaar, Viera, Boupa Diop) or at the back (Knight, Mertesacker, Metzelder)?
*
There will always be a place for big forwards. Because size is not the first thing u judge when it comes to forwards. The ability to finish, make off the ball runs, holding up the ball with your back facing to goal are still the more important attributes when it comes to strikers.
verx
post Jun 14 2008, 10:58 AM

Soshified Madridista
Group Icon
Elite
3,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


All this talk about playing with no strikers and RVN put in another performance to show why it's still important to have a reference up front. biggrin.gif
verx
post Jun 14 2008, 03:56 PM

Soshified Madridista
Group Icon
Elite
3,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(FollowN @ Jun 14 2008, 03:06 PM)
What exactly are your definitions of a reference? A player to hold the ball to wait for the the arrival of his teammates? Why does the modern game need a striker when all round fitness levels are increased? More pace and more movement mean grounds are covered in less time. Holding compounds the movement, not help. I can't see this working for an offensive team, only a defensive team with a lone striker upfront.
A reference is someone upfront to hold the ball up or to play the ball to. It's an important element of the modern game. Even if u cover more ground with today's fitness levels, u still can't beat the pace of a ball that is played directly to the frontline. And of course it's a big help when it comes to ball retention which is fundamental for an offensive team to succeed.

QUOTE
A niche area is fine and dandy, but if you get too rigid, its bad.
1st goal was from sloppy defending by Malouda.
3rd goal was from a combination of Sneijder and Robben from the kick off.
4th goal was from an individual effort from Sneijder.

What RVN performance do you guys speak of? He played almost no role in the goals scored by Holland, cept for the 2nd goal by Van Persie where he shielded a ball at the byline, not upfront. Even a winger/fullback does that.
Nobody is talking about rigid strikers just waiting for the ball to be played to their feet.
And if you do not realise how important RVN was for Holland's performance last night then I'm sorry but u have a poorer understanding of the game than I initially assumed.

QUOTE
Moving up the field quickly is not a problem because we have marauding fullbacks and attacking midfielders aplenty in the modern game. I don't think strikers are a necessity, but just a luxury to have as the only thing nice to have from a striker would be his instincts. Holding the ball is a moot point, I would say.
*
Holding up the ball is just as important as having fullbacks and midfielders make off the ball runs. And I'm not talking about just holding up the ball with your back facing the goal. Different strikers do it differently. If it was Torres he wants the ball played beyond the backline where he can exploit his pace, but he's still acting as a reference. If it was Henry he would wait at the left flank for the ball. Raul and Totti would drop slightly deeper to get the ball. They are all achieving the same objectives through different means. If you just want to rely on players coming from deep when you're on the attack you're just going to make it extremely easy for an organised defence to shut you down. No team in the modern game don't play with some sort of reference up front. Even Roma with their supposedly strikerless formation actually plays Totti in an advanced position.

This post has been edited by verx: Jun 14 2008, 03:56 PM
verx
post Jun 14 2008, 08:19 PM

Soshified Madridista
Group Icon
Elite
3,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(FollowN @ Jun 14 2008, 06:03 PM)
If you noticed, I didn't dismiss the position upfront. Instead I discarded the striker role i.e you can replace a striker with anyone offensive minded upfront.
He talked about role specialization and the way he worded it, I'd assume he was placing more emphasis than necessary on the finishing part. Also, I watched the match twice; one live, and the other one more in the morning when I got up. I'd be glad to hear from your perspective about RVN because I couldn't see how he was the most important man for Holland on the field, he did what any decent strikers would do; positional intelligent running.
Nope, again I didn't dismiss the position, only the need for strikers.
*
By saying they are a luxury aren't you are dismissing the position?
When you say put anyone offensive minded upfront aren't they strikers as well?
A striker doesn't have to be an old fashioned centre forward only u know.
And I didn't say RVN was the most important man; I said he was an important element of the team. And he didn't just do what any decent striker would do. The French defenders could hardly get the ball off him. Compare that with Luca Toni's performance for Italy who did OK but was a step below what RVN showed for Holland.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0184sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:33 AM