Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Discussion Football teams without strikers, 4-6-0's

views
     
creap
post Jun 12 2008, 10:46 PM

I would like a piece of punch line
*******
Senior Member
3,306 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: VIET POW S.O.S


QUOTE(+Newbie+ @ Jun 12 2008, 08:56 PM)
I realised this when Man Utd sold Beckham. Solsjaer, Scholes and Giggs playing in a system with 3 forwards rotating and playing off RvN. One moment, Solsjaer was a winger, the next, he was creeping in and poaching off loose balls. I realised then that this would be hard for RvN to fit in as he didn't have the fluidity that this system demanded. So when RvN left, I was sad, but I new it was to both sides benefit. Saha had the mobility and was more fluid in blending in with the other forwards.
*
RVN's departure was never due to his inability to fit into our system. He was sold because he wanted to leave.

On the topic, 4-6-0 like verx mentioned, will not show us the actual story of how a team plays. If a team plays 3-5-2, does it really mean they are playing with 3 defender? Not really, they are probably playing with 2 attacking full backs. So, then, are they playing with 5 defenders? Not really again, as they are running up the flanks during attacks, like a normal winger.

A 4-6-0 therefore, can only mean that the 6 midfielders are switching attacking roles, and thus making it hard for man-mark (Which team do it nowadays anyway). smile.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0177sec    0.69    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 04:10 AM